Entranced98

Welcome!

Hello, Entranced98! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! – Gilliam (talk) 12:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 12:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

I can't even

I'm still shaking my head, and laughing at this[1]. Thanks for reverting, though. :) Boomer Vial^Holla 12:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

You're very welcome, Boomer Vial :) Entranced98 (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

You beat meh...

		You Beat Meh
		I almost got a revert before you. Almost. Here's a kitteh. MgWd (talk)MgWd

Aww :) Entranced98 (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

i like that kitteh :) Catteth75 —Preceding undated comment added 17:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Entranced98. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

heard you like cats. :) they are awesome ;)

Catteth75 (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Cuteness overload! They're some of the most beautiful animals ever to grace this planet :) Entranced98 (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes for sure xD Catteth75 (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Uhhh, whut?

I've never edited the page "Ripon, Wisconsin" dude, unless someone else is using my I.P. then i don't know who you're talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.56.8.89 (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

According to the talk page of your IP address, you appear to be editing from a shared IP. My messages were not meant for you; they were left as warnings regarding somebody else's recent vandalism from the same IP address you are using. Scenarios like this one are a common inconvenience with shared IPs, though you can edit Wikipedia while avoiding the frustration of irrelevant messages by creating a Wikipedia account for yourself. Entranced98 (talk) 00:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

The International School, Karachi

I reverted your edit. It is not an uneccessary category. --113.203.208.196 (talk) 03:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Please…

Don't report me again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B000:B04C:F1EF:B0A7:69A0:DE2D (talk) 19:29, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

whats wrong with my edits boi

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Entranced98. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Taxonbar and synonyms

Personally, I continue to think that {{Taxonbar}} is just clutter and of no value to the great majority of readers. However, if we are going to add it to articles, let's do it properly. When the Wikidata entry is under an out-of-date synonym, as is the case at Aloiampelos ciliaris, the correct links can only be obtained by adding two taxonbar templates – the first for the correct Wikidata entity, i.e. the one under the name used in the article, and the second for the Wikidata entity at the old name. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. This mainly seems to be an issue with organisms that were recently reclassified - the taxonbar templates on plants in the Aloiampelos genus (which are examples of this) have now been sorted out this way. Entranced98 (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it usually means that the majority of other wikis haven't caught up yet, so that Wikidata is attaching its links to them to an old name. Occasionally it happens because different wikis are using different but acceptable taxonomies. As I've written many times elsewhere, the real problem is at Wikidata, which doesn't connect together the synonyms of a taxon. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Kumara, Aloidendron, Aristaloe, Gonialoe, Haworthiopsis and Tulista are other Aloeae genera that I think will need two taxonbar templates. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Davey2010^Talk 22:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for all the quick reverts on my user talk page! -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

You're very welcome :) Entranced98 (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for being so diligent and on top of the vandalism and for reverting it so quickly! Keep up the excellent work, and please know that while recent changes patrolling is a thankless undertaking, your time and effort does not go unnoticed and I appreciate it very much :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:46, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks so much! :) Entranced98 (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your reverts just then: 1 2... I refreshed the page and there was all sorts of stuff going on! Looks like all sorted now, have a good weekend! Amkilpatrick (talk) 09:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

You too, you're very welcome :) Entranced98 (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

And more appreciation from a grateful editor. Have a good weekend. Gog the Mild (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Entranced98 (talk) 10:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Vandal mass reverting user's delsort

Do you think there's a vandal mass undoing sorting of deletion pages? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

All I am aware of is that an IP hopping vandal (likely a bot) has been reverting many random recent edits today across many namespaces. Many editors have been working to deal with the problem. Entranced98 (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm guessing it is a bot because of how quickly it undoes things. Sockpuppet by a user? --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure, to be honest; I've only seen this type of vandalism from IPs today. Entranced98 (talk) 11:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

On Ricky Rubio reversal

Hi. Sorry for reverting your edit on Ricky Rubio. It looks like some IP-hopping troll was doing and undoing random edits, but in this case the undo was (maybe inadvertently) actually correct.--Gorpik (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

My apologies for the issue; it was a rather difficult situation with the vandal making hundreds of rapid-fire edits, 90% of them being very disruptive. Many thanks for sorting it out. Entranced98 (talk) 13:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

i love you

yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.87.121 (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Discussion to be canceled

https://wikivividly.com/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Massimo_Chiacchio_1997/Archive Can you delete this thread? It appears on search engines with my name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Masichia (Report bug) 12:36, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I cannot do anything about this myself, as I am not a Wikipedia administrator, nor have I had any involvement with this investigation. If you would like further assistance, please contact an administrator, who may be able to help. Thank you. Entranced98 (talk) 10:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Can you check the orthography of the article Torre-Pacheco?

First of all, I thank you for the orthographic correction in the article Districts of Cartagena, Spain.

The article of the municipality Torre-Pacheco has potential for reaching the category Starter as minimum, but it seems to have some orthographic faults.

Can you revise and check the article, please?

Torre-Pacheco

--Yolanda95 (talk) 10:54, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Yolanda95

I've now cleaned up some issues with spelling/grammar on the page - thanks for letting me know about this. Entranced98 (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction

I thank you for the orthograph and grammar corrections in the article Torre-Pacheco. :)

--Yolanda95 (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Yolanda95

You're very welcome :) Entranced98 (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Correct location of Wagah

Section 9 has been attached to talk:Wagah (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AWagah) highlighting the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.148.220.33 (talk) 14:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

You are now a pending changes reviewer!

Hi Entranced98! I've been running into you in recent changes patrolling and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling, and you consistently view and undo vandalism and disruption to articles. I believe that this user right would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tool. Instead of having you formally request the pending changes reviewer right at WP:PERM, I just went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and either accept them to be published and viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them so that the pending changes are not published.

Keep in mind these things regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you additional "status" on Wikipedia nor does it changes how you can edit articles (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself - especially those that are vandalism or have neutral point of view or BLP issues.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface you're used to, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into any troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the user rights and accepting or reverting pending changes. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, contact me and I'll remove it. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for granting these rights! :) Entranced98 (talk) 09:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

You bet, and thank you for your time and diligence patrolling recent changes and for taking on such a thankless job. Please know that your efforts do not go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Think Pink

Man I leave my laptop for two minutes and this happens. I am familiar with this charity from when I was in school though and I would be interested in making a page if it passes our notability criteria. Anyways, thanks for the quick fingers. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome :) Entranced98 (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Entranced98. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Wow

How did you realize the instant vandals perform their actions mate? Cheers & good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.254.99.168 (talk) 23:44, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

The 2018 Cure Award

In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

hi, you're invited to a RfC discussion regarding Bruno Bettelheim article.

Hi,

As a recent contributor to the article, you're invited to a Request for Comment (RfC) discussion. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 17:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bruno_Bettelheim#rfc_7DDF8CC

PS I see you're taking a semi-break, good luck with the exams! :-)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct schools in Luton

A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct schools in Luton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

My first impression was "Wow!"

Hi, Entranced98

First I read all the little boxes, on your user page, then I read: "a Wikipedia editor of five years" and thought: "Wow, a five year old is writing here and already studying math!" Then I realised, it probably means: 5 years of editing WP. Was I the only one who initially misunderstood this? I'm thinking about how it could be expressed more clear.

P.S.: On your talk page, the topics no. 5 (You beat meh...) to no. 9 ( The International School, Karachi) are in one frame. I'm wondering whether this is intentional and if, what the reason might be.

Ping welcome, Steue (talk) 13:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, that would have been pretty impressive, but in my case it wasn't meant to be! Kicking myself now for spending my days as a five year old eating crayons and leaving Legos everywhere for my poor mother to step on…🤭

Anyhow, I've clarified what I meant on the user page (was in dire need of a little update) and thanks for pointing out the issue with the talk page. I must have accidentally broken up a template somewhere, making the unrelated messages look like they were part of the same section. Hopefully all fixed now! Entranced98 (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Leaders from each country of their continent in years

Hi, Entranced98, I can’t seem to put all of the leaders in each country of their continent of their article, can you help me out, go to edit history, to see the past edits of each continent/country of their articles to see the leaders' names — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.176.174.245 (talk) 00:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

The Short Description Barnstar!

		Short Description Barnstar
		Hi Entranced98, just noticed some of your short description work - here's a rarely used barnstar for a comparatively unappreciated task! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the Barnstar, really appreciate it! :) Entranced98 (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Entranced98!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 10:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Rollback rights

Uh, I often see whenever I try to undo any unconstructive edit, a conflict error comes due to you guys. First I thought I am slower than you later I check you use some gadget called RollBack. I'm having a doubt about this right. What is the difference between the undo (normal, TW, etc.) and the Rollback (HG, RedWarn)? Those are same functions. Is it applicable for newbies like me? CSMention269 (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

The main difference between these functions is that 'undo' only reverts the most recent edit made to a page, whereas 'Rollback' can revert all consecutive edits published to a page by one account or IP. This makes 'Rollback' especially handy for dealing with strings of bad edits (for example, when an IP has vandalized one article three times in a row).

Furthermore, Twinkle (TW), Huggle (HG) and RedWarn are different software packages editors can use to deal with disruptive editing conveniently. 'Rollback' functions on all of these work in the same way, and give the option to specify the reason for a revert (which is especially handy when reverting an edit that was clearly made in good faith). As for the edit conflicts appearing it's just a matter of luck as to whether someone else reverts an edit first, at least as far as ordinary rollbacks and Twinkle are concerned. Personally I'm not familiar with using Huggle and RedWarn, so if you'd like to get started with using them, it might be helpful to reach out to another editor who does.

If you have any further questions about reverting edits or using Twinkle, feel free to let me know. Thank you for your efforts to keep vandalism at bay! Entranced98 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. CSMention269 (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for adding the description to the Blue Imperial page. It definitely improved the article. As an aside, you are (I am sad to say) completely wrong about Fahrenheit versus Celsius. However, your work on short descriptions is very kind and helpful. Thank you again,

TanRabbitry (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

No problem, more than happy to help with rolling out the short descriptions (and on the plus side, 32 degrees meaning a day at the beach rather than getting frostbite is pretty nice!) Entranced98 (talk) 11:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately where I am from 32 degrees Celsius would be a very cool day for Summer. We get that tempature in the Spring and Fall. Most days in Summer are around 38 degrees Celsius and we get a few above 43. Then in winter we get plenty of -5 degree Celsius weather.

TanRabbitry (talk) 04:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)