Dinuraeditions

Yodha Ela (Jaya Ganga)

Just be bold, if the article contains inaccuracies and you have cited references to support the changes then just do it. You don't need mine or any other editors permission to make changes if you feel they improve the accuracy of the article. The changes I made were based on my interpretation of the information you provided. You obviously have a better understanding of Yodha Ela than I do - so go ahead and make the necessary improvements and I'll stick to grammar, spelling and objectivity. Dan arndt (talk) 04:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. Dinuraeditions (talk) 04:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Personal edit war

Dan arndt has been engaged a personal edit war. He is doing destruction on Wikipedia. Note His edits on KDK Dharmawardena and history Dinuraeditions (talk) 07:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

I think that you need to read up on what actually constitutes edit warring, copy editing an article and adding maintenance templates is not edit warring. Dan arndt (talk) 08:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for your suggestion and I also have a suggestion for you. Read articles before you jump to edit and avoid destruction on Wikipedia. Dinuraeditions (talk) 08:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

I think that you need to read the relevant WP policies before you fire off accusations, which have no foundation. Dan arndt (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

I do not want to accuse anyone for nothing. But you willingly destructed some articles. Dinuraeditions (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

And what articles have I destructed? Dan arndt (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Maintenance templates and tags

Please do not remove maintenance tags and templates from articles without addressing the issues, as you did here. ratemusic.com is a user edited website which does not meet WP:RS and the same appears to be true for sinhalajukebox. Please discuss your concerns on the article talk page, but remember to assume that other editors are also editing in good faith. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

• Oh yes. Dinuraeditions (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twin Reservoir Complex

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twin Reservoir Complex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://archives.dailynews.lk/2012/05/02/fea04.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 13:04, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you, Dan arndt! ..:.. Dinuraeditions (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You are welcome. Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Your addition to The Presidential Commission of Inquiry on Bond Issuance, Sri Lanka has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but I have ended up deleting the article, as it appears that everything you included there was copied from copyright web pages elsewhere online. Everything you add to this wiki needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Maha Bo Vannama) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Maha Bo Vannama, Dinuraeditions!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously. You must not copy and paste information from a source into an article, but must instead use your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W. D. Amaradeva, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Classical and Folk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Musical artists - article layout

For artists without separate discography pages, relevant discographical information, such as record labels, date(s) of release, chart positions, and sales certifications, may be included in the artist’s discography section. It is however not necessary or appropriate to include detailed track listing of an album on an artists page nor to include an album infobox.Dan arndt (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC) @talk - Thank you. Dinuraeditions (talk) 03:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Article:Niranjala Sarojini

A new article named Niranjala Sarojini was created. Dinuraeditions (talk) 06:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Questionable sources

I'd like to draw your attention to your use of questionable sources. Sites such as Discogs, IMDb, RateYourMusic and MusicBrainz are questionable sources, with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with little or no editorial oversight. The information on these websites is predominately user-generated content and is therefore not considered to be an acceptable source or reference. In addition self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and social media postings, are also not acceptable as sources. Music retail websites, such as iTunes, FreeMusic Archive, are not considered independent sources and are therefore not acceptable either. Dan arndt (talk) 07:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maha Bo Vannama

The article Maha Bo Vannama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSIC and am unable to find any independent reliable secondary sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 07:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

@ User talk:Dan arndt - Good job! Keep it up.  :) Dinuraeditions (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Niranjala Sarojini

The article Niranjala Sarojini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, lacks supporting references which are independent and reliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st House (astrology) (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st House (astrology) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Dinuraeditions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1st House (astrology)

Hello, Dinuraeditions. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1st House (astrology), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1st House (astrology)

Hello, Dinuraeditions. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1st House".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 09:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Please delete it. Regards Dinuraeditions (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)