User talk:Delldot/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

November 2007

DemonicRhino replaced my user talk page with this message:

---

From Demonic Rhino, i will just create more accounts and i have different computers and different friends, that will always delete your things. May the force be with you...NOT!

---

Looks like someone is asking for some blacklisting.

I'm tired of this, and they should be as well. I think I'll just let other Wikipedians deal with them. Too much time has been wasted from their shenanigans.

May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator (talk) 17:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 17:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

yo

why you deleting timmyland?

My reply delldot talk 17:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage :)--Kubigula (talk) 04:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Any time! :D delldot talk 06:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

edit

hey no problem, glad I could contribute. See you around here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Triplesix666mafia (talk • contribs) 06:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Look forward to it! delldot talk 06:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Spam

New user Usla nz created his/her talk page and it was filled with info about the company of USLA, New Zealand. First, I placed {{uw-username}} on his/her page, but later, I noticed a site address. I then placed {{uw-spam}} there, and removed the previous tl, for both of them started from "Welcome", it would look odd. Also, I deleted the promotion. However, his/her name is still inappropriate, I think. Also, I proposed him/her to create an article about the company instead of placing data on his/her page, was this right?

A. Demidov (talk) 09:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 07:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

SHARED

SHARED

This is a shared IP, and please do not publish this IP on the web. Also the article of was not authorized by the artists. The artist request to be removed any of his information on the discussion page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.11.179 (talk • contribs)

Failed to reply. delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Jjj222

Hi Delldot - I appreciate very much the spirit of your message. I've been a part of Wikipedia in one way or another since the very beginning, and am very familiar with the wiki way. This particular user, Jjj22, (have a look here if you don't believe me) is a serial vandal, user of multiple sockpuppets, and is in general an abusive user who should be permanently banned. Furthermore, I think it's extremely premature and therefore useless to speculate on Mike Piazza's Hall of Fame induction. I would say his induction is hardly a forgone conclusion, as better players than himself have been denied. Considering the uselessness of this content, and Jjj22s hundreds of very POV edits with the intent of skewing every article possible to the favor of the New York Mets, is why I reverted the edit and used foul language. Jjj22 is simply an offense to articles I've worked on when there were hardly any baseball editors on Wikipedia. In conclusion I agree with the spirit of your note, but disagree totally with the content. Until admins. finally do the right thing and ban this abusive user, I'm going to do whatever it takes to let him know that his POV edits will get him nothing but grief. Googie man 20:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, if you look at the edit summary here, you'll see that Jjj22 already undid the good faith edit of a good user who undid the edit because it was POV and had no sources. Googie man 20:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Failed to reply. Delldot on a public computer (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING!

The entire article in unsourced. You are delving into subject matter of which you know NOTHING, and it REALLY PISSES ME OFF!! I met Buzz Shaw, I know Buzz Shaw and it is YOU who are letting YOUR UNSOURCED OPINIONS GET IN THE WAY!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.183.246 (talk • contribs)

My reply delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Wavester (Wikipedia:About vandal)

I have read over this latest act of vandalism that you reverted, and there was a death threat in it. He probably didn't mean to follow through with the act, but it concerned me nonetheless. I wanted to bring this to your attention. Savie Kumara 07:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 08:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I usually see if the user vandalizes one more time before I report the user, but this may be a different situation? Your call. Savie Kumara 08:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, nothing lately, maybe they went away. I'll check again later. delldot talk 09:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Whoa...

Just read over that weird Death Threat thing...and I thought I had issues!! That is just down right disturbing considering some IP addresses can be traced pretty darn well these days...76.105.183.246 08:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Heh, par for the course delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Victoria Beckham

I've updated the CSD tags that I put since I preferred to have as second opinion. Best regards--Tikiwont 09:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, duh, sorry bout that delldot talk 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

Would it be possible to know for sure if some certain user has more than one account? Just a query. And isn't it a strange thing to have more than one account? Seriously, if you have one account already I don't see why anyone would want to have yet another. May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator 00:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 01:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

IP

DO NOT PUBLISH MY IP ADDRESS.

Thanks for the cleanup

... of my sadly neglected userpage. Still, at least we have some discussion of what this guy's beef is now; I'll see if we can come to some compromise. Ecobun 11:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

My pleasure! Good for you for working it out constructively. :) delldot talk 02:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Response

I remember you asked me how the WAIS article is going. I'm very busy with school stuff these days. I've been learning the hard way that it's always best to take care of all responsibilities before you do anything else. I think I'll finally be able to catch up with myself in many ways during the Winter break. Eventually I'll even get around to serving my true purpose as a Wikipedian. I've taken a look at the articles concerning animation, and I simply must contribute all kinds of information, such as the many princicples of character animation. Squash and stretch, etc. May the Force be with you,--Padawan Animator 00:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Good luck! delldot talk 02:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Electrons

Hey, I'm running into you on RC Patrol tonight, so I thought I'd give ya a little something. Granted, it's just a few electrons, but hey, people oftentimes don't get thanked for things. So:

Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 05:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the electrons! :D delldot talk 05:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I've never really done much with the IRC channels. Is there anything worth it on there? Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 05:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 05:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

r u serious?

that was a real post check myspace for the cracker barrel crackas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.97.197.3 (talk) 07:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 07:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

small world

I am a EMT-P, going to DO school next fall my roomate is getting his masters in Neurobiology and aging at USF. What reliable source should I cite. The rap group is real (like spinal tap) based out of lebanon/kingsport tn.

matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.97.197.3 (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 07:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncle Chen (Serbian rapper)

Hi, Delldot. Why did you warn the creator of this page for blanking it? Looks like he may want us to delete it or something? Dlohcierekim 22:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply. Delldot on a public computer (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

No prob. You are welcome. Just wanted to make sure I did not miss something. Dlohcierekim 01:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

:) delldot talk 02:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of SomerVille Ecovillage

Hi delldot,

It was a bit of a shock to find SomerVille Ecovillage deleted.

I spent quite a long time researching and adding references after the notability had been questioned.

There is no copyright violation as I am the author of the official SomerVille Ecovillage web site. Moondyne does not have his or her facts straight. Yes, there are several vacant paddocks within the 399 acres but there are families living on the land now with more on the way. I would be happy to arrange a tour for Moondyne as visitors are welcome by appointment.

It is not clear to me on what basis the article was eventually deleted. Are you able to clarify this for me?

I don't expect everyone to like the article and as a relatively new author on Wikipedia, would appreciate tips on how I can improve it rather than just having the article deleted for no valid reason.

Thanks,

Neil

Ozneil (talk) 08:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 10:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Further Discussion Ozneil (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 04:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

What?

I'm the only person using this IP address and I didn't even go on the Taxi article, let alone vandalize it. Why did I get messaged about vandalizing it and what was it that I supposedly put on there?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.139.113 (talk • contribs)

Beats me. delldot talk 09:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello I am trying to set up my page , but you keep deleting it before I have finsihed it! I am a part of the TANGENT and have copied their page to use as a template for my own. If mine is being deleted can you please explain to me why the Tangent page has not been...? Or what I am missing from my embryonic effrt to ensure it stays around a while so I can finish it off! Ta Guy Manning —Preceding unsigned comment added by GuyManning (talk • contribs) 11:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 11:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Further discussion Delldot on a public computer (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Guy Manning

I see why it was tagged and deleted, but the article does in fact assert some notability, in that it states the subject was is a member of The Tangent and credits three albums, all of which have articles, by the band with him as a member, . That seems just about to meet WP:BAND. Just prior to the article's deletion I placed advice regarding WP:AB and WP:BAND on the author's talkpage. I'm not advocating undeletion, but if the article comes back it might be worth keeping an eye on it to see if it develops. Cheers, Tonywalton ^Talk 11:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 11:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I've given him substantially the same advice as you on his talkpage (we edit conflicted). Nice to see people singing from the same songsheet ☺ Tonywalton ^Talk 11:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

i am sladeakakevin

disabled from editing by the infidel mayalld

my page was my own personal page me and my friends sent messages to each other and he has disabled me from editing my friends pages from now on i will be an annonamous editor not in an account forgive me i have began a spree of vandalisim because of the fool. i appolagize to those who respect others personal space edit my old page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.84.9.226 (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Did not respond. Delldot on a public computer (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

lolololol

Re: Your message [1] LOL! You got him! Savie Kumara (talk) 01:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

:D delldot talk 04:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Marcus Garvey

That's one cleanup job. Removing the pop references and the quotes were fine, as was cutting out cites about MLK. You may have cut a bit too deep. Can you please place a note on the talk page to justify cutting out all the pop culture and other cites? Bearian (talk) 15:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I see you did it already. Good job. Never mind. :-) Bearian (talk) 16:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, feel free to weigh in delldot talk 22:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I added an artikel for wiki but till so far it has not been approved

Hello Delldot,

I want to edit the artikel I have added to wikipedia but till so far it has not been approved. Do I need to open an new artikel or do I have to wait for any comment?

There is more stuff to add & edit so I hope to get some clues.

Greetings from Holland.Lammert (talk) 12:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 13:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Streamyx

That was really odd... When I opened the tab the prod was still on the article - it was placed on 2007-12-03-014256 and you removed it at 2:25 and the version that I was working on at 2:28 still had it on! I'll restore it if you want to go thru the AfD for it - just let me know. SkierRMH (talk) 02:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Totally up to you delldot talk 03:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree- given the history obviously no one cared! Common sense would tell me if someone does care they can re-create it! SkierRMH (talk) 03:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed :) delldot talk 03:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi delldot

"Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mental disorder. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. delldot talk 14:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)"

i was expressing my appreciation for all who are wanting to read about mental disorders. they want to view that and it's not long at all. get it. it would be wrong to delete my information. My website for excellence. www.myspace.com/apromoterofgod7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.73.243.102 (talk • contribs)

the diff I reverted My reply delldot talk 01:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I'd barely found I had "new messages" only to find it had already been reverted. Much appreciated! --HamatoKameko (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

:D delldot talk 15:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Racism

I was trying to remove racist statements from the article about the caucasion race, and I was accused of vandalism. I don't know of any other way to remove the racist statements. I don't agree that I vandalized that page...I was trying to improve the content of wikipedia. Please read that article and see if you agree with me that it is racist. I don't know what else I can do if trying to remove the information won't work.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry! Let me look into it delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

It's okay, I understand you must be very busy.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your help.

Kmart2003 (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Definitely! delldot talk 16:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

template info making

Hi Got your note about the template and asking if you can kill the redirect. Yes, could you please delete this page (it's just a redirect to where I think the infobox usage should be) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:N-Number&redirect=no

thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecuguru (talk • contribs) 08:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 08:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

That's cool. I originally found a random example and tried to match it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Infobox_Automobile%22. However compliant you can make it is cool, I'm just looking for somewhere to keep a usage description separate from the template. thanks! (Ecuguru (talk) 12:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC))

Ok, done, thanks! delldot talk 22:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Im warning u

He wouldn't answer my comment and it was deleted and check the history the original comment was not a personal attack i was stating something true —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darth Anzeruthi (talk • contribs) 04:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thought you might be interested that subsequent to your warning the above editor on his talk page regarding making personal attacks he has made more personal attacks. Parsival74 (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Even though they haven't edited in a few days, they did make more threatening and harassing comments on talk pages after the last warning that I gave them, so I went ahead and blocked indefinitely. It seemed obvious that they were just trying to make trouble and get a rise out of people, and they hadn't made any positive contributions, just provocative comments on talk pages. Thanks again for letting me know about it. Peace, delldot talk 02:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

vandalism on King Abdullah II's page

thank you for reverting that recent vandalism.please see [2]for details of my complaints about vandalism on that page to admin orderinchaos.it doesn't seem that orderinchaos pays me any attention to me so can i ask you at least lock it so that registered users can edit it only??that's not the first time something like this happens by unregistered users.thanksGrandia01 (talk) 06:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

My replies delldot talk 05:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your kind attention delldot,i'll try to "soften" the tone of that section while keeping its citations and references intact.thank you againGrandia01 (talk) 07:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 05:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

hello again delldot,on that page you removed the link to toujan al-faisal's wikipedia entry which was an illustration or citation to the paragraph preceding it and you replaced it with a citation needed notice.i'm sorry but i don't get why you did thatGrandia01 (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 05:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

fixed it.please check.i was confused myself in the first place but re-arranged the structure of the paragraph now.it was just a minor change really.hope that's ok with you delldotGrandia01 (talk) 05:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 06:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

yes i understand your point.i included another source that specifically supports the sentence before it.hope that's ok with you.i'll be awake tonight for sometime so please don't hesitate to voice your comments.just hope that we're done with that section.please let me know either way.thanksGrandia01 (talk) 06:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply, moving discussion to Talk:Abdullah II of Jordan#Issue with references. delldot talk 07:26, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

hello again delldot.just to let you know,the same unregistered user who deleted the controversy section from that page has completely re-deleted it again just like that!!please see [3].can you PLEASE do something about this user or page??sorry to bother you again and again delldot but that's obviously not fair or right in many ways as you obviously know...Grandia01 (talk) 09:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

its ok with me if you don't want to bother yourself with that just please let me know so i can seek another admin's help.sorry,don't mean to bother you.peaceGrandia01 (talk) 17:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, sorry Grandia01, somehow I failed to see this last post (someone must have posted right after you). Yeah, I was kind of putting off responding, because I hate blocking people that aren't obviously vandalizing. I don't think this person is a pure vandal, since they're leaving an explanation of why they're removing the section, saying it's biased. So really the way we should approach this is by discussing it with them. Of course, if they refuse to discuss it and just keep removing it, they'll have to be warned and blocked. But hopefully we can work something out. Whatever happens, I'm probably not the best person to block them, since I've been editing the page, it would be a conflict of interest. My suggestion would be to try discussing it with them (leaving notes on their talk page and the article's talk page). If they refuse to discuss and just keep removing the material, I'd give them warnings, and after they've gone past the final one, report to WP:AIV or WP:AN/3, depending on what they're doing. If you think the page should be protected, you can go to WP:RFPP, but like I said earlier, I don't think the vandalism is heavy enough to merit protection. Sorry to have neglected to answer for so long! And sorry not to be much help. I'll try working on the section so hopefully they'll be happy with it. Don't hesitate to contact me again (you might want to start a new discussion at the bottom of the page if I seem not to see this quickly). Peace, delldot talk 10:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

hi delldot.sorry for my late reply.yes your recent edits are wonderful,thank you.the only thing that's missing is toujan faisal's link there,her story is a perfect illustration of how king abdullah punishes free speech and it was a big thing there,would you mind if i include it??other than that,i have nothing but respect and gratitude for what you've done.thanksGrandia01 (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words! :D Glad you liked the edit. Including the info about Faisal will be fine, as long as we have at least one source to cite with it. Shouldn't be hard if it was a big thing there. We could probably find one in her article, or maybe google one. Let me know if you need help. Thanks for all the hard work you're putting into the article. Peace, delldot talk 15:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your understanding delldot.i'll do that later,i'm just too tired now to do anything.will keep you updatedGrandia01 (talk) 16:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

sorry for taking too long delldot,here's my edit[4].please review.thank youGrandia01 (talk) 16:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

(undent) Weighed in on the talk page and replied delldot talk 16:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

hello delldot.you definitely have valid points,i agree with you.please edit the article as you see fit,i trust and admire your work.thanksGrandia01 (talk) 17:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

on second thought,would it be ok with you to link toujan's page to the section: democracy in jordan??if that doesn't happen then her page will be "orphaned" and i really believe that it would be very important to see king abdullah's democracy from all sides in wikipedia.let me knowGrandia01 (talk) 17:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Aw, thank you for your kind words! Sure, linking to Toujan al-Faisal sounds fine, especially since the ref you provided is more directly related to democracy in Jordan than to Abdullah himself. Of course, I hope you'll take my suggestions on Talk:Abdullah II of Jordan into account when doing it. The more refs you can find on the subject the better! Peace, delldot talk 17:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

89.179.70.189

Hello! How to deal with this? He's posted the same sentence to numerous talk pages and it makes no sense. The proper way'd be to clean or delete them, or just leave them be? Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 07:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply delldot talk 08:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I've left them a note. Was it you that deleted those edits to the talk pages in the end? Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 07:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep! delldot talk 08:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I've pointed them to the list of other Wikipedias, but you can still leave a more elaborate note if you wish. Lazy ;) --Ouro (blah blah) 08:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! delldot talk 08:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Verlet integration

Is correcting, structuring and clarifying errors vandalism? I also want to add that the article I added is not spam, as you can verify yourself: http://www.fisica.uniud.it/~ercolessi/md/md.pdf I'd like to see my adjustments restored, while I spent some expensive hours of my time to it. If you can show me one error in my adjustments, be free to show me where. Thanks a lot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.149 (talk) 14:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

So sorry! undid my revert. delldot talk 15:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Doreen Granpeesheh Deletion

Hello. You just deleted Doreen Granpeesheh's wikipedia page. This is the second time it has been deleted. Can you please give me some valuable tips on how to make it relevant to wikipedia so that it doesn't get deleted again? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Centerforautismandrelateddisorders (talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure! Thanks for asking. First, before you start, you should make sure the subject meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for people. The most important thing for notability is whether they've been covered my independent reliable sources such as newspapers. If not, they don't meet the notability criteria and should not have an article. At least as importantly, every statement in the article should be attributable to reliable sources, such as journal or news articles. These sources must be independent of the subject (e.g. the website of a group she's involved in would not work, though you could probably include it in an 'external links' section). Anything that has not been published in reliable sources cannot be included in Wikipedia. Third, the article should be neutral in tone. I thought the article was too positive about the subject; it's important that the wording and slant of the article not be too positive or negative. Fourth, the material must not violate any copyrights; all material should be in your own words. If you own the website you copied the material from, you can donate the text, but this is sort of an involved process, and it's much easier to write it in your own words. Fifth, you should not write an article about a subject you are involved in per our conflict of interest guideline. For example, if you are Doreen, or a coworker or close friend of hers, you should not write the article; instead, you should request it and wait for an uninvolved person to write it. If you can meet all these criteria, your article is almost certain to be kept! I'm glad to help you further if you need any more tips or any clarification of any of these. The blue links are to the relevant policies I recommend you read. Peace, delldot talk 15:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Is it possible to say where the article is too positive about the subject? I already removed some words like 'easily', 'clear', ... that could give a more positive image of the Verlet method than the actual. I should note that I'm not a native English speaker, so I don't have a perfect 'feeling' about these things. Kind regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.149 (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

No no, your edit was fine, I didn't think it was biased. I responded to you on your talk page, this message at the bottom of my talk page was for someone else (she had written an article about herself, I think). I was just asking whether I had missed anything in replacing your text, or whether there was more I needed to undo. You made a valuable contribution and I messed up by reverting it, sorry to cause you more trouble. Peace, delldot talk 04:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see, I was mistaken. Sorry for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.149 (talk) 10:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem, just glad we got it straightened out.  :) delldot talk 11:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

A City Warning

why'd you delete A City Warning? They meet WP:BAND. City warming (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note. The answer is that it's not enough for the band to meet the criteria; the article must actually assert why they do. The article I deleted was a 2 sentence stub that made no assertion of notability. Can you explain to me how the band meets WP:BAND? I'm unfortunately going to have to delete the article you recreated too, since it also fails to assert notability (unless you can add such an assertion). Sorry! You can look at my first response in the above section for a summary of things an article absolutely must have to be kept: reliable references, a neutral tone, and an absense of bias, for example from parties with a conflict of interest. Don't hesitate to let me know if you need help or further explanation of any of this. Peace, delldot talk 12:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The Articles

Please read ASAP!

Hello Deldot, I am WikiSandbox1 I need your help

I accept you complaint and where you wrote it but those articles need to have something witten on them because if people are reseacing the first place they will go is Wikipedia.

it is possible to help create these articles so that they are like its other members.

Please reply ASAP for mre info

WikiSandbox1 (talk) 07:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Well I think it's great that you're interested in getting these articles together! I applaud your efforts, and I'm glad to help. My only concern was that an article that just says "this article is in progress" should not be in the mainspace, and is not more useful to people than nothing at all. Probably what would be better for the meantime (before we have anything written to put in each article), would be a redirect with possibilities, i.e. a redirect to a more general topic (such as the Victorian Railways article) for now. That way, people that come looking for the particular line will at least get some more general info. And once you have something to put in the article, it can be changed back from a redirect into a full article. I'm glad to help with any of this if you'd like.

Another, unrelated suggestion I have is that you archive messages on your talk page instead of removing them outright, per the talk page guidelines. Thanks much, sorry for the hassle! Peace, delldot talk 07:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

slant magazine edits

hey, thanks for the message. i removed the list of reviews because i thought maybe they were contributing to the article being deemed too subjective. any suggestions on what else can be done to make the page seem less like an adjective. i changed the description but is that enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.62.120 (talk) 16:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for getting back to me. I'm really glad you're working on improving the neutrality of the article, it's one of the most important things you can do around here!

I had a look at it, and I thought the biggest problem with it was not the neutrality, but the notability; the article doesn't really explain what makes this site different from other online magazines. That is, it doesn't really justify why there should be an article about the magazine in Wikipedia (see WP:WEB for the guideline on notability for websites). Therefore I'm concerned that the article might not survive if someone nominates it for deletion. The most important thing you can do to fix this is to include citations from outside sources (i.e. independent of the magazine itself) that discuss it. If the magazine has been discussed and written about in sources like the news, that will show that the subject is notable and the article should stay. If it hasn't, the article will likely be deleted. Other than that, you can check WP:WEB, and if the site meets any of the criteria there, you should explain how it does in the article.

My last suggestion would be to create an account. It's free and easy, and it has several perks. For example, I'll know who you are if you leave a note on my page, whereas I'm probably not going to remember your IP address. Plus you get a watchlist so you can monitor changes to articles you're watching, and there's other benefits. Just a thought.

Thanks again for working to improve the 'pedia! Definitely let me know if I can be of any help with all this. Delldot on a public computer (talk) 04:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, never doing this again.

A long time ago, I made this edit. Yep, I actually found it after all this time! Wow, I must've been really frustrated. After a while, of course, I decided to contribute positively. Anyways, tomorrow's the last day before the winter break! Hooray for Christmas! Ha ha ha, merry Christmas! Happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 23:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

My reply Delldot on a public computer (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Response.--Padawan Animator (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Jake ford

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jake ford, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jake ford is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jake ford, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Are you a bot

Are you a bot. Do you understand the issue? Paul gene (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Delldot on a public computer

I just don't quite understand why you use this other account. Could you please explain what advantages come with that other account of yours? Merry Christmas, and happy editing,--Padawan Animator (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey Padawan, glad you asked! I use the sockpuppet Delldot on a public computer because my real account has admin rights, so if it were to get hacked it could cause a fair amount of trouble for the 'pedia. So when I'm editing from a 'public computer', one that's not mine, I'm paranoid about stuff like keyloggers and other stuff that a potential hacker could use to steal my password and hack my account. In reality, it's probably pretty unlikely that all the necessary events would occur in the right sequence for this to happen. But since I'm not the only one that would suffer if it were to happen, I have a responsibility to be paranoid about it. So I edit from an account without admin rights when I'm editing from a computer I consider to be insecure, or one I'm not sure about. See also WP:SOCK#LEGIT, though it doesn't really have more info than what I just gave. Lemme know if this answers your question! Peace, delldot talk 15:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Meant to do this earlier...

Thanks :-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

:) delldot talk 15:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

IRC cloak request

I am delldot on freenode and I would like the cloak wikipedia/delldot. Thanks. --delldot talk 16:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Pardon me?--Padawan Animator (talk) 17:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15