User talk:Dbenbenn/archive6

Image:Frost Aerial.jpg

Could you indicate at Image:Frost Aerial.jpg where you got that photo? You said above that such photos come from theTerraserver, but as far as I can tell the Terraserver photos are always black and white. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 15:07, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If you were not aware, the United States Geological Survey agency takes photographs in both color and black and white. Based upon my own experience, most of the older images or images taken in the mid-western United States are black and white, but there are exceptions. Your results will vary from place to place. --GRider\^talk 22:10, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Note: copy of a post from User talk:Mathwiz2020#Image:Frost Aerial.jpg: Go to Microsoft Terraserver and, on the left, type in "9201 Scott Drive, Rockville, Maryland", the address of Robert Frost Middle School, and click "Go". It will take you to a page listing three aerials: "Urban Areas 4/7/2002", "Aerial Photo 4/20/1988", and "Topo Map 7/1/1981". The topo map is just a topographical map; the 1988 aerial is black-and-white (the one you are referring to); and the 2002 aerial is both color and higher resolution (the one that I used in the Robert Frost Middle School article). Since the 2002 photo is labelled "urban areas", if you want an aerial of a rural or suburban area (although I consider Frost to be suburban, it is close enough to Washington, DC to be considered urban), you will only have access to the topo and the black-and-white aerial, not the color aerial. — mathwiz2020^{talk|contribs} 16:57, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Huygens.jpg

What is source of Huygens image?

Superborsuk 14:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

How should I know? We don't even know who originally uploaded it. dbenbenn | talk 12:05, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Star Trek

Hey David! How's it going? I was hoping if you can help me make Star Trek a featured article. There seems to be so much content missing despite having a lot of content already. I believe it needs a complete rewrite and work over as well a lot of reorganization. As it stands, it is an interesting read, but there is much lacking here. Information about cast, production, or wikilinks to them... relationships of Star Trek in culture, relationship of Star Trek with NASA... stuff like that. Please help me by contributing your thoughts to Talk:Star Trek. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Images

Heh, sorry about that. I just figured that out recently, so i'll remember next time. Thunderbrand 20:53, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Why did you remove the ifd header on Image:MeStephenJW.jpg? RickK 21:16, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

I processed its nomination, along with all the others from April 27. It wasn't deleted since it isn't an orphan. I left a note at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stephen Weierman (as you saw) asking for it to be renominated once the article that uses it gets deleted. I should have copied the original IFD nomination to Image talk:MeStephenJW.jpg, as I usually do. Sorry about the confusion.

About the backlog at WP:IFD: when I left for vacation, I left a request at Wikipedia talk:Images and media for deletion#Admin attention needed. It appears no one processed IFD while I was gone. I'm back now, but any help would still be appreciated. dbenbenn | talk 21:26, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

I generally try to avoid doing actual deletions from the VfD and IfD pages, I have too many people attacking me as a deletionist, and I don't want to give them any more ammunition. RickK 21:38, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Multilicense

Hi Ed. Would you be willing to release Image:2004 US elections map.png as {{cc-by-sa-2.0}}? Since the GFDL is incompatible with the Creative Commons licenses, Image:2004 election maps.PNG is technically a copyright violation at the moment. (One could argue that the other images used are implicitly GFDL, having been uploaded here by their creators, but that's slightly iffy.) Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 05:28, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

You need to ask Wapcaplet who created the original .svg file. ed g2s • talk 10:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

If Wapcaplet's image is share-alike then mine is automatically. It's free. Do what you want. ed g2s • talk 22:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Actually, as I understand it, when you modify an image that is multilicensed, you can take it under any of the licenses individually; you don't have to release your modified work under all the licenses. Copyright is such a pain. I went ahead and tagged Image:2004 US elections map.png as {{cc-by-2.0}}. That actually isn't share-alike, but it's the license I needed. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 22:57, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Hi Wapcaplet. I notice you multilicense all your PNG and JPG images with all the cc-by licenses. Would you be willing to license Image:Map of USA with state names.svg as {{cc-by-2.0}} or any other such cc license? I ask because for now, Commons:Image:United States 2004 election maps.png is technically a copyright violation, since it combines a GFDL image (Image:2004 US elections map.png, which was produced from your SVG file) with cc-by-2.0 images. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 16:01, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Oh, the troubles one must endure simply to declare "yes, I want this to be free." :-) But I suppose I did sort of exclude SVG from the blanket license given on my user page. I have added the multi-license to the SVG file in question, and will revise my user page. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! -- Wapcaplet 17:14, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Higher resolution iceberg

Hi Kils. The high-resolution version of your iceberg photo from [1] has been uploaded to Image:Iceberg14.jpg. Are you willing to license this version under the GFDL? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 02:56, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

hallo David. thank you for the notice, no, i want to keep the copyright for the high res images. I am early retired and on disability and sometimes I can sell the high resolution images, and I urgently need the royalties - good luck to you - Uwe Kils 22:02, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Okay; I deleted the high-resolution version from Image:Iceberg14.jpg. I also uploaded a higher-quality thumbnail of the image, that is still only 420 pixels wide. Is that okay with you? (Perhaps I should have asked first, but I thought it would be better if you see what I'm talking about. I'll delete the version I uploaded if you want.) dbenbenn | talk 22:26, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

hallo David and thank you. no, please reset it to the old resolution Uwe Kils 22:40, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

"old resolution"? The resolution was the same ... anyway, it's gone. dbenbenn | talk 22:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Hiya!

Hiya, Dbenbenn! Thanks very much, and that's cool about not noticing, I got a microwave as it was. ;-) That request for adminship of mine was a real roller-coaster ride—if you want to see the weird side of it, take a peek at this request for arbitration, that just went live.--Bishonen | talk 23:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright

Unfortunately, "lets keep it" means absolutely nothing in copyright, court, or law in general. Find us a good, well sourced and free image and then I am willing to keep it. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 02:29, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Of course, I wrote more than "let's keep it". Anyway, see Category:Presumed GFDL images, which points out that

"assuming the image is redistributable under GFDL just because the original uploader didn't say otherwise is similar to assuming an image is GFDL just because the original uploader says so."

You have to trust people eventually, and what I meant by my comment at WP:PUI is that even if the uploader is AWOL, he can probably be trusted.

Is there anything more I have to do to formally dispute or object to the image's deletion? I hope you won't simply ignore my objection ...

By the way, if the image is replaced by a good, well sourced and free image (especially if it's higher resolution), then I'll have no objection to deleting Image:Airflow.jpg. dbenbenn | talk 03:13, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

There is nothing there to lead me to believe that he took the picture. The most glaring thing is that the photo date is extimated. So, no, this is not GFDL-presumed. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 12:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

You mean "estimated", right? Not knowing when you took a photo isn't very surprising. And the uploader could probably have narrowed it down closer if he had bothered. So again, I believe the uploader took the photo, and I intend to dispute its deletion. dbenbenn | talk 16:36, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

There is nothing to indicate either way whether or not the uploader took the picture. In addition, pictures of cars are fairly easy to come by. Thus, I see no reason to keep it. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 17:21, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

Normal cover?

Can I take a pic of a NORMAL cover AC switch and get you to put THAT on the page Light switch? Thanx 68.39.174.150 04:49, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Hi! In order to upload photographs, you have to create an account. It's free and only takes a few seconds. Then you can upload whatever photo you want and edit light switch to use it. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 05:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

NowCommons

Hi Gren. You might find that {{NowCommons}} makes life a little easier. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 03:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for showing me the now commons template, that should come in handy :) gren 05:32, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

movielens

Heya, I noticed you editing a movie list, have you seen this? Not flawless, but kind of cool both for keeping track of what you've seen and what to watch next. disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with movielens apart from being a user; this message, though unsolicted, was only sent to one editor. --W(t) 06:28, 2005 May 30 (UTC)

Thanks for the link! That site is down right now, but I'll be sure to check it out. dbenbenn | talk 06:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Are you sure? Working fine here, I was just using it a minute ago (which is why I thought of it when I saw your edits), and it's working now too. --W(t) 06:47, 2005 May 30 (UTC)

That's so strange. It works fine from work, where the internet is largely broken, but I can never load it from home. dbenbenn | talk 17:02, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Vail Pass

Hi Matthew. When processing your deletion request for Image:DSCN2091 vailpassrestarea e 600.jpg, I noticed it was different from Commons:Image:DSCN2091 vailpassrestarea e 600.jpg. I presume the version I just deleted here was the original? Anyway, I uploaded it at the Commons, and then reverted. dbenbenn | talk 23:46, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

The version I uploaded to the Commons is the one to be used. I adjusted the brightness/contrast to my liking when I uploaded the Commons image. The one currently that was in Wikipedia should be deleted entirely. I'm curious why you overrode the one in the Commons? -- Decumanus 00:12, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

Note that the brighter one is still the current version, so it's the one that appears at Vail Pass. I uploaded the non-brightened version because I think it's good to keep the original image whenever possible. What if someone else wants to see how you adjusted the image, or wants to make their own changes? dbenbenn | talk 00:17, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Los amantes del círculo polar

Hi. You recently moved the page Los amantes del círculo polar to Los Amantes del Círculo Polar. This is incorrect nomenclature as titles in Spanish are not capitalised on any letter other than the first (note that the IMDB, which may be your source, gets this wrong too). I thought as you were an administrator I would ask you first to move it back to Los amantes del círculo polar rather than listing it on Requested moves. --Ngb 16:42, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I've moved it back. Note that you could have undone the move yourself; being an administrator wasn't necessary. dbenbenn | talk 19:12, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Great, thanks! I thought I couldn't move a page to somewhere where another page existed already, even if it was only a redirect, but obviously I was wrong about that. :) --Ngb 21:46, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Quotes

Hello, I like the two quotes from NPR on your userpage. Do you have more complete references for them, or at least who said them? Thanks. Osmodiar 09:26, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I heard them on the radio, and wrote them down as fast as I could. The second quote is apparently due to Bruce Schneier. The first was on NPR on March 4, 2005 on Morning Edition [2], possibly in the Letters section. (No sound card on my computer, so I can't listen to those archives. Please let me know if you find the quote!) dbenbenn | talk 19:14, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:EconNaziPropaganda.png

I'm rather perplexed at your taking this off of IFD as "not an orphan". The whole point is that it is unencyclopedic because the text has been deliberately garbled, not that it is an orphan. The only two editors to speak on this were myself, being the nominator, and the uploader, who agreed with its deletion. Perhaps you simply misread the disussion. Thanks.--Pharos 01:44, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Since images can't be undeleted, I'm quite cautious about deleting them. I agree that the image is nearly worthless. But the people who edit Nazism should be making that decision, not me. I suggest that you remove it from the article, and relist it on WP:IFD. That way editors watching Nazism will notice the image's removal, and will have a week to express any objection. dbenbenn | talk 01:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chess template Translate aid

Hello I am working at first on es.wikipedia.org,

Can you help me with information about how to translate the chess board template?

I affraid the little images with this is based are not in wikimedia:commons, either in en.wikipedia, then the traslation to other languages are hard. Is this correct?

Can other wikipedias use templates from other languages?

Thanks

A copy of these questions are on the chess board template discussion.

--Gengiskanhg 22:49, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've replied at Template talk:Chess position#Translate aid. dbenbenn | talk 23:23, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I've rereplied at Template talk:Chess position#Translate aid. Please answer my question so I can begin to work, thanks. --GengisKanhg (my talk) 21:02, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:PD-Germany

You seem to have permanently protected this template. You might note that it has been marked for deletion [3]. --Henrygb 10:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, Quadell protected it. See the log. dbenbenn | talk 14:22, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

IfD

Hi Dmcdevit. Great work listing unverified orphans on IFD! But when you do that, you need to add {{ifd}} to the image description page, and drop a note at the uploader's talk page asking for information. For example, I decided not to deleteImage:AXthree001.JPG (which you listed on June 6), since it looks like a user photo. I instead asked the uploader, User:Alezane, for more information. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 19:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh, wow, I'm not usually that absent-minded! I guess it was because of the mass-listings, I'd neved do that on VfD. Well, anyway, sorry, I'll fix any that are left, and be more careful in the future. Thanks. --Dmcdevit 19:56, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hkicon.gif

If the image is still orphaned, then may I ask why was the image kept. The orphan issue was why I listed the image on IFD in the first place. Also, I hope the creator of the image still does not think I am running a conspiracy here. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, there were a few objections to deleting. Since images can't be undeleted, the instructions in the second paragraph at WP:IFD are very conservative.

User:Mcy jerry's contribution to that discussion was pretty hilarious! By the way, I really appreciate the work you've been doing tidying up images. Thanks! dbenbenn | talk 06:26, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do you think it will be ok to place the image at IFD again, since it has not been used since it has been removed from the templates? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:09, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yep. dbenbenn | talk 03:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I placed it back there, the creator of the image removed my {{idw}} notice from his talk page. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 15:54, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

chess template

The contrast doesn't seem too good for the boards. Why not create a separate template instead, that way we can choose either. -- Natalinasmpf 01:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What do you mean by "contrast"? Do you mean the green color? By the way, I just uploaded darker versions of the white pieces, since they faded out a bit when scaled down. Perhaps that was what you meant? dbenbenn | talk 02:20, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Last night, all of the colored squares in the Wikipedia chess tournament boards became white for me, making it impossible to distinguish light-color squares from dark squares. I much prefer the previous colors. H Padleckas 14:41, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, the intention of course wasn't to make all the squares the same color. In my browser it looks the same as it did two days ago. Anyway, I've modified the template slightly. Does the board at Template talk:Chess position t look right for you, with green and white squares? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 18:02, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I just checked my chess game. Now I see green and "cream"-colored squares. I think that's much better. Thank you for the fix. H Padleckas 18:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oops! I just checked the template in the above link you gave. The squares still look mostly white. I will check again. H Padleckas 18:15, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The template was reverted, since it didn't work. The version at Template talk:Chess position t is for testing, to get the kinks worked out. What browser are you using? "Mostly white": do some of the squares look green? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 18:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please look at [4] for discuss this. :-) --GengisKanhg (my talk) 18:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think we can create a powerful template for universal use at wikimedia with the next characteristics:

1. Background colors (to be choosed by invocation)
2. Piece styles (to be choosed by invocation)
3. Algebraic notacion at the board edges with some possibilities like: 1) none, 2) At Up and right, 3) At all edges.
4. Possibility to add "transparent backgrounded-fixed oriented arrows" on the squares for give "arrows" capability to the chess diagrams. (Can we put and images on another one on templates, so they be added in the transparency case?)

Technical Questions:

1. Should LaTeX support will be more powerfull than this possibilities suggested???
2. Can we make a general template and invocate it from another template which define some (but not all) of its parameters???

(Copied from english template talk) --GengisKanhg (my talk) 19:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

More about icebergs

Hi again, Uwe! You tagged Image:Iceberg.jpg as being fair use. Is the bottom berg someone else's? Do you remember where it came from? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 00:02, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

hallo David - no, they are both mine - will change it to gfdl - they are from Antarctica - best greetings Uwe Kils00:10, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

krill 300 frames per sec

the framerate 300 per sec was the recording speed Uwe Kils 03:15, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

VfD Closing process

Good afternoon. There's recently been some discussion about ways to simplify the VfD closing process. I know I have some pride-of-authorship issues and may not be as perfectly impartial as I'd like. Would you mind taking a few minutes to review the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion process#Simplification and share your thoughts? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 20:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Move an image to Commons

Greetings Dbenbenn. I was wondering if the picture Image:The Little Prince.jpg from The Little Prince could be moved to Commons.. what do you think? And, would you know, how to do that? (I am a very new user :)

The image was scanned by fr:User:MagicTom for Le Petit Prince and then copied by you into the English version; then there are more local copies in other languages, as well. And I just started one in Russian. Thanks in advance for any help! - ru:User:Bepa - Introvert 09:05, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) (Talk)

No, the Commons doesn't accept "fair use" material. You can read more at Commons:Commons:Licensing. dbenbenn | talk 13:55, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Aye, I see... thanks for help - Introvert 20:17, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gdansk WP:RM

I have move the page back to Gdansk. I think you should wait for a consensus as specified by WP:RM before moving the page. The Gdańsk spelling is not used in English. Please fix the double redirect on Danzig which you have changed and I can not undo because it is protected. Philip Baird Shearer 28 June 2005 15:22 (UTC)

Done. I only moved the page because it was in Category:Articles lacking diacritics. I didn't know it was listed at WP:RM. dbenbenn | talk 28 June 2005 15:46 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration against User:JarlaxleArtemis

This message is to inform you that a Request for Arbitration has been initiated against the user JarlaxleArtemis. Since you have previously been the target of this user's alleged attacks [5], you are invited to join yourself to the proceedings and/or present evidence at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis_2/Evidence. —Psychonaut 29 June 2005 15:37 (UTC)

Election votes

Hello Dbenbenn, thank you for your voting.

If I understand correctly, you voted from Commons wiki and here English Wikipedia. As you know, every voter have only one vote by person. You can vote from anywhere you have over 400 edits, but you have to choose one project from which you would vote.

I stroke the older vote(s) and left the latest one from here. If you would like to change your vote again, please vote from the wiki you have voted last time.

Your reply on my meta talk page will be appreciated.

Thank you!

Aphaea* 30 June 2005 10:14 (UTC) P.S. your pic(s) is not only impressive but also helpful for my task. Thank you for lovely winter view!

Getting an image deleted

Hi Ben, and welcome to Wikipedia! To get an image deleted, after adding {{ifd}}, you have to actually list the image at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 1 July 2005 19:52 (UTC)

Hi -- You left a message on my user talk page about how to delete images. Was there a particular image you thought I should delete?--Bcrowell 1 July 2005 20:14 (UTC)

At Image:1cx.jpg you wrote "I uploaded this with the wrong name, and now am not sure how to delete it." and tagged it {{ifd}}. dbenbenn | talk 1 July 2005 20:17 (UTC)

Ah, thanks! Done. --Bcrowell 1 July 2005 23:23 (UTC)

June 23 IFD

Hello. I answered some of your comments at the page. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 3 July 2005 22:29 (UTC)

Dotty maps

Dotty maps by CSS are done with Template:GBthumb. Which I cribbed off Template:Ie citytown infobox. -- RHaworth 2005 July 6 07:03 (UTC)

shallot

Hi Joy. User:Shallot is still an admin. Do you have any objection to de-sysopping that user account? dbenbenn | talk 5 July 2005 16:03 (UTC)

I really don't care, as long as you don't give the account away to someone else or desysop Joy :) --Joy [shallot] 6 July 2005 10:29 (UTC)

Bled lake

I've answered your question on my talk page ~ Booyabazooka 7 July 2005 01:21 (UTC)

Wikisource logo

I put a new message on your talk on meta. I hope you will do anything necessary to improve the situation. Thanks. --Aphaea* 7 July 2005 03:01 (UTC)

Image:Fiery knight.JPG

I'm sorry, I can't find the reason you removed the Image:Fiery knight.JPG image from IFD. Is there reason? The picture was taken in 1944 Burma with swastikas everywhere. It is titled "Fiery Knight." The other picture on his user page was also listed as 1944 Burma with more swastikas under the title, "Swastika Knights." I don't think the references are subtle. Yes, it is his user page, but this is not his private website. Wikipedia and a public shared resource that must submit to standards of decorum. I am not aware of User:Curtsurly publicly defending the pictures in any way. I may be mistaken.--Muchosucko 7 July 2005 15:09 (UTC)

I don't see any swastikas at Image:Fiery knight.JPG. I didn't delete the picture because there was an objection; see Image talk:Fiery knight.JPG. If you think the image is a copyright violation, feel free to list it at WP:PUI. dbenbenn | talk 7 July 2005 15:17 (UTC)

Image:Fiery knight.JPG

There are five swastikas down the right side. Look closer. It is not a copyright violation. It breaches polite sensibilities.--Muchosucko 7 July 2005 16:21 (UTC)

Re: Image:"Fiery Knight" subject for Deletion

Hello,

Thank you for your vote of confidence regarding the image, "Fiery Knight", which is simply an image of my Father that I doctored deliberately to reflect my interest in the Swastika in all its guises. I appreciate your swift action most significantly. Again, much thanks for helping me save this personal image from deletion.

Everett

blood_victory 9 July 2005 03:48 (UTC)

Commons protection

Yes, I guess I could've, but I was pressed for time at that particular moment. I didn't have the time to go through the entire upload process. Besides, wouldn't it need to be deleted afterwards anyway? Is still a lot of work. Thanks for your help and the tip anyway. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:37, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

IFD again

Please be more careful when listing images at WP:IFD. For example, on July 6 you listed Image:Peaches and Bongo1.jpg, saying that it has no source. It has a source clearly indicated. Also, you failed to tag the actual image with {{ifd}}, and you did not notify the author. dbenbenn | talk 15:41, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Whoops! I guess I didn't look to closely beyond seeing no copyright tag (which was added later). But there is no excuse for that and not tagging and all. I'll make sure it doesn't happen again. Incidentally, I wonder if I could ask you a question about image deletion. If I were to list that image again, its only crime being that it is an orphan, could it be deleted on those grounds only? I can't remember seeing many like that listed. --Dmcdevit·t 20:08, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, feel free. I suppose it is also UE. dbenbenn | talk 20:46, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Fair use

I don't know if Image:NZNF with banner small.jpg is related to the above. I created it as a smaller version of another photo because the Fair Use was being challenged. One of the fair use criteria is that the image be reproduced at a lower resolution. Is there a specific reason that you don't think the fair use challenge was sincere or that we can reproduce the image at full resolution and still claim fair use? The discussion spread across many different talk pages, so it'd take me a little while to find all the previous discussions on this image, but I'd be happy to do so if you'd like to review them. Thanks, -Willmcw 20:20, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realize it had been discussed. Personally I think the large version is sufficiently small (only 2 inches wide on a 300dpi printer!) that it's okay. If you disagree, feel free to change the two pages that use the image back. dbenbenn | talk 20:46, 15 July 2005 (UTC)