Daviddwd

Welcome!

Hello, Daviddwd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Physical and logical qubits has been accepted

Physical and logical qubits, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Date template

I see that you have recently added Template:Date to some military history articles. The template documentation says "This template should only be used internally in other templates." It should not be used in articles. If you know of other instances of this template that you have inserted in articles, can you remove them? Thanks in advance. Binksternet (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad! I'll go and fix them some time this week --Daviddwd (talk) 09:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Daviddwd, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Please create a section heading for template data

Please create a section heading when you add template data, like this. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Foreign policy of China) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Foreign policy of China.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add your references.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Descriptions

Really appreciate the work you're doing on solar stuff. Thanks! It would help the rest of us if you described your changes in your save dialogs. Thanks again for listening. Lfstevens (talk) 09:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Got it! Lately I’ve been adding descriptions to a ton of things, and I enabled the extension that won't let me submit without a description. —Daviddwd (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

I concur. However, please resist the temptation to slip in other stuff while you are there, like you did at Non-tariff barriers to trade. I'm sure it was good faith but it undermines your credibility when you are doing this very useful task. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Information Technology in the United States moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Information Technology in the United States, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Individual One listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Individual One. Since you had some involvement with the Individual One redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 12:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Hi, you are lighting up my 4000+ watchlist with insertion of short descriptions. I've no idea where you are getting them from but, for example, this one seems to be rather misleading. - Sitush (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

And this one is completely wrong. Caste is a tricky area (hence the sanctions regimes that cover it) and it is very easy to unnecessarily offend people and/or start an edit war. If you're not sure what you are doing in that area, it might be best to skip those articles. - Sitush (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

In fact, on a second look at your recent edits to the latter article, you've also incorrectly tagged it for mdy dates (should be dmy for all India articles). And you linked a term inside a quotation, which we should not do (it is linked immediately after the quote anyway). I also notice that not including a linebreak after the short description template makes for a messy start in the editing windows, which tend to confuse new contributors at the best of times. - Sitush (talk) 05:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Sitush: OK, noted. I'll be more judicious and careful. --Daviddwd (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not even sure why this is being done - is it something to do with the mobile platform? I do hope it is for WikiData harvesting! - Sitush (talk) 06:45, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

It's the first preview people get on a mobile search, and also visual edits in the Visual Editor. I know it's also related to WikiData, but I don't know if it's related to harvesting.

I see. Thanks again. - Sitush (talk) 12:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Well, we're now in the ridiculous situation where short descriptions are being added here and others are being imported from WikiData! That entire project is flawed and it is infesting this project. - Sitush (talk) 11:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Oh boy :) --Daviddwd (talk) 16:39, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Short desc and Template:short-description listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Short desc and Template:Short-description. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Short desc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 20:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC) Redirects cause problems with the short description editing gadget. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 18:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

American English template

May I ask why you are tagging articles about phonetic sounds with {{Use American English}}? They are generally organized in accord with the British-based International Phonetic Association, which usually uses Oxford spelling. Nardog (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

That's a fair question, @Nardog:. I tagged articles that had apparently American English spelling with that template, agnostic to (and frankly unaware of) the fact that IPA is UK-based. My rationale was essentially that I saw ⟨-ization⟩ instead of ⟨-isation⟩ and similar; however, that is also the convention of the Oxford spelling. I don't recall seeing any words that would be distinguished in the Oxford spelling from American spelling conventions, such as travelling vs. traveling, or even analyse vs. analyze. If you like, I can refrain from tagging those articles with the American English spelling in the future.

Basically, I saw what looks to me like American spelling (and I am indeed American) and tagged those articles with it. I can apply further scrutiny, use the {{Use Oxford English}} template categorically on them in the future, or refrain from any such tagging if you like. Let me know what you prefer. Hope this explains my rationale. --Daviddwd (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Yes, I would rather you didn't tag them or tagged them with the Oxford spelling template. I don't think there is an explicitly established convention or consensus on this so there are probably inconsistencies, but we do use "close" and "open" in the article titles to refer to the vowel height when American literature usually prefers "high" and "low", for example. And language-related articles overwhelmingly prefer the IPA over the Americanist notation after all. I note that the title of R-colored vowel omits u, but that's presumably because the sound is most notably found in American English. Nardog (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Indeed i find this tagging problematic. While it makes sense to go for consistency within an article, it is imho often not that clear or obvious which style is used in a specific article (or should be used), even more problematic is it if that that assessment does not originate from the actual author/editors/maintainer of the concerned articles.--Kmhkmh (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Noted; I'll take that into account. However, the templates say to tag according to consistency within the article. I got the impression that it MOS:RETAIN gives this approach its blessing. --Daviddwd (talk) 08:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Well yes afaik we have a guideline or recommendation to normally stick to already clearly established styles (including English variants) and one for topics geographically or culturally (strongly) associated with a certain English variant. For articles that belong to those cases, tagging with such a template might be appropriate, but we have large number of articles for which neither of those cases (established variant, cultural or geopgraphic ties) doesn't really apply (yet) and those imho should not be tagged (yet).

Independent of this particular issue one could consider something I'd like to call "defensive tagging", that is only tag when needed and keep the number of templates in an article to the really needed minimum. This is because every (new) template potentially makes the source text harder to read/understand (in particular for beginners), may cause problem for other various editors and often does not translate into other language wikipedias (which is a hassle for people writing or maintaining articles or topics across several languages).--Kmhkmh (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

OK, I'll keep that in mind. --Daviddwd (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I can't see why a whole host of maths articles are being tagged this way. And it feels unpleasant to me. In what way is it good to tell people that a maths article is American? I don't see this as encouraging contributions. Can't tyou restrict your tagging to where it is more relevant thanks. Dmcq (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

I understand what you're asking. I assure you, I'm only tagging articles written in American English with the tag. It's solely a maintenance tag that says not to change the way articles are written (mainly spelling). I haven't tagged mathematical articles that aren't written with American English with it, and even tagged a few as British English that are written in that convention. --Daviddwd (talk) 21:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

• These [1], [2], [3] are tagged {{Oxford English}}. Were there decisive words that support this, esp re US and UK English? If I understand this thread correctly, such a tag is only OK when other options are excluded, and still that is open for discussion at talk:article. -DePiep (talk) 07:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

It was my understanding that the consensus for chemistry articles is to use the IUPAC's preferred Oxford spelling; however, I'm willing to discuss and stop doing this if that's what the community agrees upon. --Daviddwd (talk) 19:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I estimate that between approximately 22 January to 24 March 2019 you added short descriptions to at least 10,000 articles, which is all very good work indeed - however you simultaneously added the "Use American English" template, and often the "Use mdy dates" template to a large proportion of them. While many of those articles have an obvious national tie, a good proportion of them do not and neither seem to have established a language variant. While I have reversed a few of these changes, the volume of verifying suitable usage required is beyond my capacity. I'd simply invite you to give your current view upon your use of those templates way back in 2019! I do recognize that you are not adding these templates in the same industrious manner as then, and see no issue with your current editing. Batternut (talk) 12:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

States of Malaysia

Hello Mr. Daviddwd and thank you for your tireless contribution on "short description". When you edit the states of Malaysia.. I see you put "State of Malaysia" in the infobox of 11 from 13 states in the country. It seems you missed Penang and Sarawak. Night Lantern^halo? 03:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I got you, friend --Daviddwd (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks Mr. Daviddwd! Night Lantern^halo? 05:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Strange formatting added to article

In this edit, you added unnecessary span tags and added duplicate ISBNs. If you are using some sort of script to make these changes, please adjust it to avoid these errors. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Here's a similar edit, if it helps you track down what went wrong. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting. That is a script, specifically the WP:Visual Editor. I was trying to homogenize the formatting of book citations that were in Wikilink format. I'll be vigilant about this going forward. It seems to only affect books. -- Daviddwd (talk) 15:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

I fix a lot of ISBNs, so I see all sorts of strangeness. This duplication of ISBNs appears to happen only when there is already an ISBN template inside the URL link, which doesn't work and probably confuses VE. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for your work maintaining the encyclopedia! --Daviddwd (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Alpha Sigma Nu

I'm presuming that the added shortdesc for Alpha Sigma Nu is a mistake.Naraht (talk) 17:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh weird! I think it might be a bug in the visual editor because I definitely remember changing it to "honor society at some Jesuit universities" from what I had copied from some other page. Sorry about that! ~~----

Oh, I changed the date to that instead of the short description, lmao -- Daviddwd (talk) 18:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Expert needed

On December 27, 2018, you added the {{expert needed}} tage to Quantum threshold theorem, but did not explain why that page needs expert attention either in the template or the talk page. If you do not provide an explanation shortly, the tag may be removed as vague per WP:DRIVEBY. You can specify a reason using the reason= parameter in {{expert needed}} or explain it on the talk page, in which case you should link to that section using {{expert needed|talk=Discussion title}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your edit to History of the Jews in Singapore

Hi - you edited the number of Jews in Singapore from 2,500 in 2015 to 10,456 in 2015. Do you have a source for this? Thanks. -ryand 09:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Link syntax

In your fecent edit of Fourier transform, you introduced several links of the form [[Wavenumber|wavenumbers]]. Please, use rather the syntax [[wavenumber]]s, which produces exactly the same result. This would be cleaner and make easier to read the source. D.Lazard (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Information Technology in the United States concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Information Technology in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Information Technology in the United States

Hello, Daviddwd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Information Technology in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of some foreign character warning box templates

Several foreign character warning box templates, some of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the templates' entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Paul_012 (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Political corruption sidebar country

Template:Political corruption sidebar country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Koine

Thanks for your edits on Koine Greek. I just wanted to let you know that I just fixed a typo you introduced over two years ago. Small things like this are easy to overlook.... --Macrakis (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)