Colfax1

Orphaned non-free image File:Trial and Error Stickman Album Cover.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trial and Error Stickman Album Cover.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Nathanstickman7.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nathanstickman7.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tunnel Vision Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tunnel Vision Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Thank you for your work on Tunnel Vision (Stickman album). Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). The Tunnel Vision (Stickman album) article does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:

• contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
• is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
• is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nathan Stickman. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. You've been warned once before here. This is your final warning; you will be reported if you continue to disrupt the AfD process. It is not an "attack" as you put it in your AfD comment; this is a perfectly normal Wikipedia process. QuietHere (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Tunnel Vision (Stickman album)

Hi. I noticed that over the last few days you've removed the redirect at Tunnel Vision (Stickman album) in favor of an underdeveloped article. I've added some tags to the article indicating areas of improvement. However, are you sure the album meets the criteria outlined at WP:NALBUM? If I just go by the text and sources in the article now, it doesn't look like it does. The preferred solution for articles about albums that don't meet that criteria is to redirect them to the band or artist that recorded them. If it does meet the WP:NALBUM criteria, please add the information and sources necessary to demonstrate that to the article. If it doesn't meet the criteria, then please restore the redirect. If you have questions or need help, let me know. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

This page has been up for 13 years with no problems. It has direct references to All Music and the artist's website album page. Deleting this article directly impedes with the album discography. Colfax1 (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by, "Deleting this article directly impedes with the album discography". However, the article as currently written does not show that the album meets the criteria to have an article, which is listed at WP:NALBUM. Specifically, the article needs to demonstrate that the album "has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." It also would help if the article mentioned (with sources) that the album had charted or been nominated for a major music award like the Grammys. If the album does not meet the notability criteria, or if sources showing it meets the criteria cannot be added to the article, then the redirect is the appropriate solution. This is different than deleting the article, which I don't think is likely to happen as long as there is a suitable redirect target. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tunnel Vision (Stickman album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tunnel Vision (Stickman album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunnel Vision (Stickman album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Acoustic Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acoustic Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Futurelook Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Futurelook Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JPT Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JPT Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nathan Stickman Transition album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Stickman Transition album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pocket Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pocket Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trial and Error Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trial and Error Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Turn of Luck Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Turn of Luck Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Walking Stickman Album Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Walking Stickman Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stickman (singer-songwriter known as Nathan Stickman)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stickman (singer-songwriter known as Nathan Stickman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A01:4C8:A4:D8F:11D:5B9F:7E36:1DA4 (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Stickman

Hello, Colfax1,

I see you have tried to recreate an article on this artist that was deleted through AFD. As long as the article is in the main space of the project, it will be tagged for speedy deletion, CSD G4. The only way I know to overcome an AFD decision to "Delete" is to create a draft article in Draft space and submit it to Articles for Creation for review and, hopefully, approval. The draft will have to overcome the problems that caused the original article to be deleted so it is quite a hurdle but not impossible. I wish you good luck with your writing efforts.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's deletion process, it's always a good idea to bring them to the Teahouse where you can receive advice, support and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Stickman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathan Stickman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A01:4C8:49:B2A2:243F:CCFF:FEB7:7D26 (talk) 17:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Stickman (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Stickman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Colfax1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

This article was there was on wikipedia for 15 years, suddenly its in violation and was deleted. The article is well documented and has even been cleaned up, so not sure why its not approved to be reposted. Colfax1 (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Stickman (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Stickman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Stickman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathan Stickman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Stickman. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KH-1 (talk) 13:39, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Stickman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stickman. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 20:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

This article was on wikipedia for 15 years with no problem at all. Now there are even more updated sources and yet it gets deleted. Colfax1 (talk) 20:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Keep recreating it and (a) it will keep being speedily deleted, and (b) you will lose your editing privileges altogether. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

But you didnt answer my question. This article was on wikipedia for 15 years and it was never a problem. Why is this article such a problem now? Colfax1 (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nathan Stickman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nathan Stickman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Stickman. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusalkii (talk) 22:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Stickman

Hello, Colfax1,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Actualcpscm and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Nathan Stickman, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Actualcpscm (talk) 21:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Colfax1,

Please stop recreating this article. It will inevitably be tagged for speedy deletion CSD G4. The only way to overcome an AFD "Delete" decision is to write a strong draft version and submit it to WP:AFC for review. If it is approved it can be moved into main space.

If you have any questions, please bring it to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Stickman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathan Stickman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nathan_Stickman. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Deauthorized. ^(talk) 02:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing because of your persistent re-creations of a page which you know full well has been deleted as the outcome of consensus at a deletion discussion. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by individual editors ignoring what everybody else thinks and doing what they like. All of us sometimes have to accept a consensus that we personally believe is wrong. I have set the block to last for two months, which is fairly long for a first block, but in deciding on the length of the block I took into consideration the fact that you have sometimes re-created the article under different titles, which looks very much like attempting to hide what you are doing in order to avoid deletion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 10:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

The article was on Wikipedia for 15 years without any problem. Not sure why this particular article is under such attack as it has been improved considerably with references. Nothing was done to be deceitful but only to improve Wikipedia and its content. Colfax1 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Incidentally, the fact that almost 95% of your edits have been deleted should in itself convey to you that there is some kind of problem.In my 13 years as an administrator I doubt that I have ever before encountered an editor who has done so much editing of which so much has been deleted. JBW (talk) 10:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

The article was on Wikipedia for 15 years without any problem. Not sure why this particular article is under such attack as it has been improved considerably with references. Nothing was done to be deceitful but only to improve Wikipedia and its content Colfax1 (talk) 14:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)