Chris-nz
Welcome edit
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cancer Cure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cancer Cure edit
A tag has been placed on Cancer Cure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nancy (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Cancer Cure. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. nancy (talk) 20:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cancer Cure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cancer Cure edit
A tag has been placed on Cancer Cure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nancy (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems on Cancer Cure edit
Hi there Chris-nz. There is a very clear copyright notice on the page http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html, which states Copyright © 2006 faqshelp. All Rights Reserved. Distribution Or Republishing Is Not Permitted. If you are the copyright holder then you should read the instructions in the notices above which explain how to go about releasing it to GFDL. Until this has been done please do not recreate the page again; it will be deleted and you run the risk of being blocked from editing which I am sure you don't want. nancy (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cancer Cure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cancer Cure edit
A tag has been placed on Cancer Cure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cancer Cure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Cancer Cure edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cancer Cure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Cancer Cure. I (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cancer Cure, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 21:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Cancer Cure edit
Please stop recreating the article Cancer Cure until a couple of issues have been addressed. One is the copyright issue -- see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the correct way to assert that you own the copyright to the material.
However, asserting the correct permission will not be enough for this article, as it will still have the problem of being an essay and original research. Please read Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_publisher_of_original_thought and Wikipedia:No original research for details on this problem.
If you continue to recreate the article as it was, without addressing these two issues, you will be blocked from editing, so please take a minute and read the links above.--Fabrictramp (talk) 21:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cancer Cure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.geocities.com/faqshelp/CancerRemission.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cancer Cure edit
A tag has been placed on Cancer Cure, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 21:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Cancer Cure, you will be blocked from editing. Redfarmer (talk) 21:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jonathan § 21:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Cancer Cure edit
I have nominated Cancer Cure, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancer Cure. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Redfarmer (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Cancer Cure edit
First of all, put your messages on the bottom of my talk page. For new topics, place a ==(topic)== on the heading. Second of all, I suggest that you link your pages appropriately. Rather than [1], use Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cancer_Cure. I strongly suggest that you read Help:Contents/Links.
Ok for your question, the sources that I mentioned are in the ncbi pages that you included in the Cancer Cure page. --Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
G'day edit
You seeem to be having a bad time with the Cancer Cure article, and I'm guessing it will be deleted - again. Please don't recreate it if that happens.
Instead, I suggest you read WP:NOT and see if it all makes sense to you. And if I can help, drop me a line on my talk page - at the bottom of it with a new heading is normal, but hey, whatever you do in a Wiki is not too hard to fix.
You may decide Wikipedia is not for you. But many of us started off with negative experiences like this and did get involved in the long run. Andrewa (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
From my user page:
Could you please userfy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:USERFY#Userfication_process the 'Cancer_Cure' article to Chris-nz --Chris-nz (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't think there's any point in doing that... for one thing IMO it will just be deleted anyway, now that the AfD has gone this far, and for another, isn't it already available elsewhere on the web? You could propose it at the AfD discussion and see whether it gets any favourable responses, but I wouldn't be hopeful.
But I have copied it to http://source.pbwiki.com/Cancer%20Cure just in case you don't have access to a wiki and would like it in one! email me for the password if you'd like to work on it there. Unfortunately Pbwiki syntax is not quite the same as MediaWiki, but it's similar enough that most people get the hang of it, or you can try their WYSIWYG interface (they call it point and click). If you'd like a copy on a MediaWiki-based wiki, you might look at putting it on Wikinfo, see http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Main_Page for their policies in a nutshell. Or if you like Pbwiki, you might like to set up a wiki there just for Cancer Cures. It's easy, and free if you don't mind the ads. Or you could try Wikia, but my own attempts to set up new wikis there have all been rejected so far. Lots of possibilities! Andrewa (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)