User talk:Carlossuarez46/Archive 12
Administrators' newsletter – January 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There are a number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6:
- G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
- R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
- G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.
- The Wikimedia Foundation now requires all interface administrators to enable two-factor authentication.
- Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.
Technical news
- Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
- At least 8 characters in length
- Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
- Different from their username
- User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
- Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
- {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.
Arbitration
- Following the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: AGK, Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, Mkdw, SilkTork.
Miscellaneous
- Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
- Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Disambiguation link notification for January 8 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pronnoi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Same (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Assorus (Sicily) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dionysius of Syracuse
- Balla (Pieria) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pliny
- Chalastra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Anchialos
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 22 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Berge (Bisaltia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Strymon
- Doberes (Paeonian tribe) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Strymon
- Idomenae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Stena
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Archives edit
I recommend you archive this page. TheSmartPersonUS1 (talk) 02:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- done Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alopeconnesus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aeolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:ADG edit
Template:ADG has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Flapjacktastic (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
- Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
- A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.
Technical news
- A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Disambiguation link notification for February 6 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Dionysiopolis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Aeolian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Aeolia
- Maedi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dardania
- Mesembria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Darius
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Cities in Iran edit
I saw your article on some cities in Iran and they were decent. But I found a problem. Do not capitalize "romanized" unless it is the subject or a proper noun, or at the start of a sentence.TheSmartPersonUS1 (TSPUS1) (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kajin edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kajin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 02:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 13 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Kyustendil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Strymon
- Maximianopolis (Palestine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jezreel
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_20#Template:Infobox_former_subdivision
"Infobox settlement" is a misleading name. That aside, it is defined to be used on territorial entities below a country and is used that way.
| Namespace | Category:Administrative territorial entities by type | Category:Former administrative territorial entities | (Current) | Category:Proposed administrative territorial entities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Category:Countries | Category:Former countries | Category:Proposed countries | |
| Template | {{Infobox country}} | {{Infobox country}} | {{Infobox country}} | {{Infobox country}} |
| Category | Category:Country subdivisions | Category:Former subdivisions of countries | Category:Proposed country subdivisions | |
| Template | {{Infobox settlement}} | Two infoboxes are used:
{{Infobox former subdivision}} - less than 1800 transclusions[1]
|
{{Infobox settlement}} | {{Infobox settlement}} |
Would you still oppose if "Infobox settlement" would be renamed? 77.183.23.149 (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Itanus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Cyrene
- Praesus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Leben
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The RfC on administrator activity requirements failed to reach consensus for any proposal.
- Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.
Technical news
- A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
- paid-en-wp
wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing. - checkuser-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.
- paid-en-wp
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2019 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Base, Einsbor, Jon Kolbert, Schniggendiller, and Wim b.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
|
|
|
Technical news
- In Special:Preferences under "Appearance" → "Advanced options", there is now an option to show a confirmation prompt when clicking on a rollback link.
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee clarified that the General 1RR prohibition for Palestine-Israel articles may only be enforced on pages with the {{ARBPIA 1RR editnotice}} edit notice.
Miscellaneous
- Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
- As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
CfD edit
You previously commented at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 August 18#Category:Assassination attempt survivors. You may be interested in commenting at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 April 24#Category:Failed assassination attempt survivors. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bithynium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcadians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular edit
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:50, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) edit
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment concluded that creating pages in the portal namespace should be restricted to autoconfirmed users.
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
Technical news
- XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.
Arbitration
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions
; administrators found failing to have adequately done sowill not be resysopped automatically
. All current administrators have been notified of this change. - Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment is currently open to amend the community sanctions procedure to exclude non XfD or CSD deletions.
- A proposal to remove pre-2009 indefinite IP blocks is currently open for discussion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for May 17 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Gryneium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Pitane (Aeolis) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Evenus
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24 edit
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Attaea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ancient Anatolia
- Parium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Milesians
- Thebe Hypoplakia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Archaic Period
- Tium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Amastris
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Idrias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hittite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 7 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadrianopolis in Epiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Illyricum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
Administrator changes
Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
- An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
- An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.
Technical news
- The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
- Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
Miscellaneous
- The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
- The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.
Discussion of link language wrapper templates (June 2019) edit
A discussion has started about wrapper templates of {{Link language}}. You may be interested in participating because you participated in a related previous discussion. E^pi*i batch (talk) 02:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC) (Retro is my main account.)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
Administrator changes
- 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
- 1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
- 2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
- In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
- The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
- The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
- A request for comment seeks to determine whether Wikipedia:Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.
Technical news
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.
Miscellaneous
- In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop Fram. This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.
Category:Films critical of Judaism and Jews edit
Hello, Were you planning on adding any articles to this category? Right now the only content is Category:Nazi antisemitic propaganda films, so I was about to request deletion at CFD, but I thought I'd ask you about it first. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:39, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
@Anomolous+0: It's part of a Category:Films critical of religion; I'm sure other content can be found - try looking and if there is none, you can try nominating for deletion. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hey there - I checked out a handful of films in Category:Films critical of religion that I thought looked promising. Alas, the only one I ended up putting into Category:Films critical of Judaism and Jews was Seder-Masochism (which is more of a gently critical satire, but I guess that counts). However, one article & one subcat still isn't enough to justify a category. I really can't devote a whole lot more time to it myself -- I was hoping you might help out yourself, since you created the category, but that's your call. Anomalous+0 (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bonitai edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bonitai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 03:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambig Project edit
Hi. Just a note that there's no need to create talk pages consisting only in the {{Disambig Project}} banner (you can see its documentation for the reasons why). Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 22:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the page Wikipedia:Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
- A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.
Arbitration
- Editors may now use the template {{Ds/aware}} to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.
Miscellaneous
- Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
- The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
Speedy deletion nomination of Kwash edit
Hello Carlossuarez46,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kwash for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Red Phoenix talk 17:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Hola que tal? Veo que esta categoría ha sido creada nuevamente. Es posible que desee eliminarlo.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
db-g4 posted. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).
Administrator changes
Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
Floquenbeam • Lectonar- DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
- Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime
Technical news
- Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
- The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
Miscellaneous
- A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
Administrators' newsletter – October 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories
.
- Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which
Technical news
- As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
Arbitration
- The 2019 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place October 4th to 10th.
- The arbitration case regarding Fram was closed. While there will be a local RfC
focus[ing] on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future
, there is currently a global community consultation on partial and temporary office actions in response to the incident. It will be open until October 30th.
Miscellaneous
- The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Nomination of Biduiyeh-ye Nakhai for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biduiyeh-ye Nakhai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biduiyeh-ye Nakhai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiAviator (talk) 06:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Hoseynabad-e Khani, Arzuiyeh for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoseynabad-e Khani, Arzuiyeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoseynabad-e Khani, Arzuiyeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiAviator (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gardu River (disambiguation) edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gardu River (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Qaravəlili, Balakan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
One line article. Not enough content.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brown Chocolate (talk) 07:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
- EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
- Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
"Jireh" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jireh. Since you had some involvement with the Jireh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
The article Lois Hart has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [2]
Arbitration
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
Nomination of Birinci Ərəbcəbirli for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birinci Ərəbcəbirli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birinci Ərəbcəbirli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PenulisHantu (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of İkinci Ərəbcəbirli for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article İkinci Ərəbcəbirli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İkinci Ərəbcəbirli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PenulisHantu (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
Technical news
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
"Qaleh Kohneh (disambigation)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Qaleh Kohneh (disambigation) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Qaleh Kohneh (disambigation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
"Yengejeh (disambiguaiton)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Yengejeh (disambiguaiton) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Yengejeh (disambiguaiton) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28 edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Düziçi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kajin to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Auric talk 12:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Furnace Creek Inn, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An INN, NOT a settlement! Notability not established with substantive sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 17:46, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Cape Horn, Alpine County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Vista point not a community
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 18:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Jones Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Former ranch, not a notable community
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 18:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Burton Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Goodmans Corner, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An uninhabited corner on the road [5], not a community
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Croft, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Pettit Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Like those at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aragon Place, Arizona, a former ranch, not a community or town of notability)
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Harts Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a community [8], a former "roadside gas station" is not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 19:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect "unincorporated community" pages edit
There are hundreds of pages for "unincorporated communities" in California that you mass-created from the GNIS database. As shown in countless recent AFDs, the GNIS is not reliable in its "populated place" classification, and this does not translate to a site being notable. A very small selection of places that are variously not actually communities, part of another place, or simply not notable:
- Cape Horn, Alpine County, California
- Junction Ranch, California
- Jones Place, California
- 18 Mile House, California
- Furnace Creek Inn, California
- Peterson Mill, California
- Ashford Junction, California
- Keough Hot Springs, California
- Sonora Junction, California
- Biola Junction, California
- North Wawona, California
- Cameron Airpark Estates, California
- South Wawona, California
- Emerald Bay, El Dorado County, California
- Hume Station, California
- Midway, Kern County, California
- Lackey Place, California
- North Belridge, California
- Halfway House, California
- Burton Mill, California
- Goodmans Corner, California
- Pettit Place, California
- Harts Place, California
- Moreland Mill, California
- Mitchells Corner, California
- Thomas Lane, California
Not to mention the countless more that are former places yet retain the incorrect "is". Your help in sifting through these to remove the non-notable ones, merge/redirect the duplicative ones, and update the incorrect ones would be greatly appreciated, including by WP:G7. Thanks, Reywas92Talk 19:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Pilibos Ranch, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Ranch, not a notable community https://www.facebook.com/pages/Simonian-Farming-Company-Pilibos-Ranch/157127057661281
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 20:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Big Trees Village, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Trees Village, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Trees Village, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 01:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Chaney Ranch, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a community [Chaney Ranch, California], no indication a ranch is a notable place
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Camp Owens, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is Camp Erwin Owen in Kernville, California. No indication this is a notable community or notable county camp for at-risk youth.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:51, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Dan Ryan Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Whoever Dan Ryan is, his ranch isn't notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Toyanza Subdivision, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toyanza Subdivision, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyanza Subdivision, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
Technical news
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Miscellaneous
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
AfD edit
Nomination of Indian Lakes Estates, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Lakes Estates, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Lakes Estates, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Halfway House, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halfway House, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halfway House, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 20:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaney Ranch, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaney Ranch, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaney Ranch, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Hall Station, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hall Station, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall Station, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kettleman Station, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kettleman Station, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kettleman Station, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Searles, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Searles, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searles, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 22:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Westwood Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westwood Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westwood Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Reno Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reno Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reno Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Quincy Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quincy Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quincy Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of D Flourney, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D Flourney, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D Flourney, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CJK09 (talk) 22:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Parkfield Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parkfield Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkfield Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 02:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Pond, Butte County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. Does not appear on topos, could not find any verification or significant coverage beyond the single source given.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 00:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Moreland Mill, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moreland Mill, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moreland Mill, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 01:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Panoche Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panoche Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panoche Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 02:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Oroville Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oroville Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oroville Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Oil Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oil Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oil Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Flourney, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flourney, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flourney, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:00, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Salmon Creek, Mendocino County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salmon Creek, Mendocino County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salmon Creek, Mendocino County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Castle Gardens, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Castle Gardens, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Gardens, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lookout Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lookout Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lookout Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 03:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Blue Lake Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Lake Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Lake Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 04:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ashford Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashford Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashford Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Beatty Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beatty Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatty Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 00:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Binney Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Binney Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binney Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 15:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Herlong Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herlong Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herlong Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Grove, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grove, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grove, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 23:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Pentland, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pentland, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentland, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 01:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Stirling Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stirling Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stirling Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bormister, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bormister, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bormister, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CJK09 (talk) 02:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Conaway, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conaway, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conaway, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 02:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Nomination of Dunlap Place, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunlap Place, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunlap Place, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bowman Place, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bowman Place, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowman Place, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bryants, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryants, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryants, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CJK09 (talk) 06:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
GNIS stubs edit
The GNIS stubs you mass-created a decade ago are proving a real nightmare to sort out. Some assistance in the cleanup would be a huge help. Hundreds of the articles you created are for individual ranches or homes that are not communities and never were. But because they were shown on a map at some point in the past (GNIS contains pretty much every name that has ever been shown on a map) they now exist as permastubs that contain no useful information and never can or will be expanded. CJK09 (talk) 06:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Grizzly Peak, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grizzly Peak, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grizzly Peak, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Hoffman Point, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoffman Point, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoffman Point, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Briarwood Canyon, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Briarwood Canyon, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briarwood Canyon, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Willow Valley, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willow Valley, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willow Valley, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Happy Valley, Calaveras County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happy Valley, Calaveras County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Valley, Calaveras County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Carlossuarez46, coming across this file I was wondering if this is indeed a view on Heyatabad, Kamyaran. If positive, the image could be added to the article. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Broadview Farms, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broadview Farms, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadview Farms, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 01:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sunset Point, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunset Point, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunset Point, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 04:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Apex, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apex, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CJK09 (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
I've also added 8 other similar stubs to this AFD. CJK09 (talk) 01:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Green Springs Ranch, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Green Springs Ranch, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Springs Ranch, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CJK09 (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Alabama Hill, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alabama Hill, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alabama Hill, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tiger Lily, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiger Lily, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Lily, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Springfield Meadows, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springfield Meadows, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springfield Meadows, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Spring Creek, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spring Creek, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spring Creek, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 03:46, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Çiçek Islands edit
Hello, Carlossuarez46,
Thank you for creating Çiçek Islands.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
See talk page.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
North8000 (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Balgatia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Impossible to find sources for this town, or any information about it. If it exists, it is extremely unlikely to pass Wikipedia notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Balbissa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sources exist for the existence of this town, and even if it did exist we know nothing about it. It is highly, highly unlikely that this comes anywhere near passing Wikipedia notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Callum (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No sources can be located; this does not pass Wikipedia notability guidelines
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Arilla (Lydia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources and emphatic lack of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Armaxa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources and information; emphatic lack of notability here
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Chalcaea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Archeion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Ardistama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Arianzus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Artanada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Aspenzinsos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charax (Corsica) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charax (Lesser Armenia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charax (Lydia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charax (Media Atropatene) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charax (Pontus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
We don't even know where it is, we just have a single vague reference to a place name. Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Charmidea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Choria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Chelae (Bosphorus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Chelae (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Bolos (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Bonita (Paphlagonia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Baris (Pisidia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Bargasa (northern Caria) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Chryse (Lesbos) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 04:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Daphnus (Bithynia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Delphin (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Dekaton (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Dekaton (Bithynia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Dascylium (southern Caria) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Dascylium (Aeolis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Dadokome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Colonae (Hellespont) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Colonae (Leontis) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Clitae (Bithynia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Cynuria (Arcadia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this district, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Cressa (Paphlagonia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this city, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Cicysium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Congustus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Conana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
reason for proposed Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Coralla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Corniaspa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Corsiae has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Corycium Antrum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Corytheis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No way does this unknown and unlocated village pass notability requirements. Lack of sources, lack of information, clear absenceof notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Cossaea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Crioa (Attica) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is an unlocated village. Lack of sources, lack of information about this village, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Crobyle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 06:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Colla (Thrace) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This absolutely does not pass Wikipedia notability requirements. Lack of sources, lack of information about this settlement - if indeed it ever existed at all. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 06:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Cnausum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This definitely does not pass Wikipedia notability requirements. Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 06:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Damasei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable. Lack of sources, lack of information about this town, clear lack of notability here. Just because it is a place name on a map does not mean it needs a Wikipedia stub article
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LegesRomanorum (talk) 07:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Arroyo Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable subdivision - a small subdivision just outside the city limits of El Dorado Hills. I was unable to find any significant coverage of this locality as a distinct community rather than just a subdivision or street name. I can't find anything to indicate it passes WP:GEOLAND either.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CJK09 (talk) 02:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Farley, California edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Farley, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 03:51, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion edit
Just an FYI. Over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome is a discussion about some of the articles you created recently about ancient Greek village you may want to participate in. Or maybe just lurk. -- llywrch (talk) 06:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Lower Forni, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. An individual homestead; not a community and never was one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CJK09 (talk) 07:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Upper Forni, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. An individual homestead; not a community and never was one.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CJK09 (talk) 07:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Murietta Farm, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails GNG - Coverage is limited to the types of routine minor mentions that would be expected for a large farm. "Unincorporated community" label appears to be OR as GNIS lists it as a locale and all sources describe it as a farm.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 14:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
"Martuni, Azerbaijan" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Martuni, Azerbaijan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#Martuni, Azerbaijan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have updated the article that you created in 2008 at Günəşli, Shamkir, and provided a citation for its being formerly named "Martuni". See my comments at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#Martuni, Azerbaijan. --Bejnar (talk) 08:03, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
Administrator changes
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
Nomination of Upper Forni, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Upper Forni, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Forni, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Claussenius, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Old Pino, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Bonetti, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Campana, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:30, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Cedar Creek Camp, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. No significant coverage found (actually, no coverage of any kind found outside of its mention in Durham's gazetteer), and the name implies it was nothing more than a short-term mining camp, which is not inherently notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Darlington, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Fairbanks, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Flora's, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. No significant coverage exists and no evidence exists that this locale is or ever was an actual community (it was most likely a roadhouse, based on the name and on the historical patterns of the region).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:48, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Fornis (former settlement), California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. No evidence exists that this locale is or ever was a community. Most likely an individual homestead or farm.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Fornis, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Gilberts, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Gold Trail Park, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point. See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Griminger, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point (most likely an individual household or farmstead). See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Happy Valley, El Dorado County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point. See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Jacobsen, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacobsen, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacobsen, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Leonardi, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence that this place is or ever was a community. The GNIS entry only establishes that it was a name on a map at some point. See WP:GNIS for further explanation of this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Manzanita Acres, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manzanita Acres, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manzanita Acres, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Rancho del Sol, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rancho del Sol, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rancho del Sol, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Old Fort Jim, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. Its listing in GNIS only establishes that this name has appeared on a map in the given location. It does not establish that this place is or ever was a community, and I was not able to find any coverage indicating that it was. See WP:GNIS for more information on GNIS "populated place" listings.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 09:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Marble Mountain, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable subdivision; fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 23:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Mariemont, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:V. No evidence exists that this locale ever was a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 23:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article McManus, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. No evidence that this locale is or ever was a community. Listing in GNIS as a "populated place" only establishes that the locale was named on a map at this location. "Populated places" in GNIS include individual homes and farms, not just communities.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 23:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Van Vleck, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GEOLAND. No evidence that this locale is or ever was a community. Listing in GNIS as a "populated place" only establishes that the locale was named on a map at this location. "Populated places" in GNIS include individual homes and farms, not just communities.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 23:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Snoboy, Fremont, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snoboy, Fremont, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snoboy, Fremont, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Shell, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad siding.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:15, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Pitco, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad siding.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Gordon, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable, apparently unpopulated, unincorporated place.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Anza, Imperial County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable unincorporated railroad siding. All within El Centro, California city limits, as far as I can tell.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that an article you created, Sunnyslope, Butte County, California, has been nominated for deletion, but you don't seem to have been notified. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Also Parkhill, California, James, California, and Nelsons Crossing, California. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Special:WantedTemplates edit
Hi, I have been cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_" is pointing to your monobook.js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add // <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript> to the top and // </syntaxhighlight> to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_". alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin (many people are using vector these days) and don't need to keep the old page, you could just have the page deleted. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 20:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Malis has been nominated for renaming edit
Category:Malis has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
Technical news
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
Arbitration
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Happy Adminship Anniversary! edit
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Hopewell, Lawrence County, Arkansas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not even a stub
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mariyaismail (talk) 09:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hopewell, Lawrence County, Arkansas edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hopewell, Lawrence County, Arkansas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mariyaismail (talk) 09:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Meinert, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meinert, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meinert, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Your comment edit
Hi. I'm looking at an old comment of yours. You posed the question, "Do Jewish American basketball people do things differently than their Gentile counterparts? if so, prove it." That leads to some obvious observations. First, do people from Peru and Ecuador do things differently? Second, do Jewish American athletes have the right to represent the country of Israel if they choose to in the WBC? Third, are the Jews, among other things, a nation? Fourth, do Jewish Israeli basketball players have different rights in the Israeli basketball league than Jewish American basketball players? Fifth, to be on Team USA in the Maccabiah Games, do you have to be a Jewish American? I would suggest you consider these things. --2604:2000:E010:1100:D74:4BA6:C673:9C4 (talk) 06:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ecuadorian and Peruvian are nationalities - people with passports that say Ecuador and Peru. I have no problems with categorization based on country. What I have issue with is categorization on race/ethnicity/religion where there is no evidence people with such race, ethnicity, or religion do anything differently. As to eligibility to do various things that aren't particularly germane such as representing various countries is immaterial. So, whether Jewish sports leagues or the Maccabiah Games treat Jewish American basketball players differently than Baptist American basketball players is also immaterial. Any more than whether the Kansas Sports Hall of Fame treats basketball players who played high school basketball in Kansas from those who didn't, we don't create Category:Basketball players who played high school basketball in Kansas. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Happy First Edit Day! edit
|
Happy First Edit Day, Carlossuarez46, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! HeartGlow (talk) 02:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) |
Happy First Edit Day, 17 years ago edit
|
Hey, Carlossuarez46. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 10:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC) |
|
Category:American people of Iraqi-Arab descent edit
Hello,
Re: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 August 21#Category:American people of Iraqi-Arab descent, I sympathize with your delete vote and I, too, wish to see this erroneous category gone, as well as a great number of ethnic-related ineligible categories.
However it currently makes thing look like there is an absence of consensus, with 2 upmerge incl. myself as nominator, 1 keep and your delete. This could lead to the category being kept by default. Seen the relatively low stakes (the 11 articles there are a droplet next to the 200+ articles in the parent category and its subs), would you consider to change your vote to upmerge in the spirit of reaching consensus? Place Clichy (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day! edit
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
- Ajpolino • LuK3
- Jackmcbarn
- Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Nomination of Ponderosa Basin, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ponderosa Basin, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponderosa Basin, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kocher, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kocher, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kocher, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 14:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Drum, Mariposa County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drum, Mariposa County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drum, Mariposa County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Elkhorn, Mariposa County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elkhorn, Mariposa County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elkhorn, Mariposa County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 04:59, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of McLeans Ferry, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McLeans Ferry, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McLeans Ferry, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 16:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of McLeans Bar, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McLeans Bar, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McLeans Bar, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 15:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Chichi, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chichi, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chichi, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 04:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Sary-Kaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Short, unlikely to exist, and if it did, likely not notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Techie3 (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Bagbanlar, Ganja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Short,unlikely to exist, and if it did exist, not notable on Wikipedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Techie3 (talk) 03:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sary-Kaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sary-Kaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Techie3 (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bagbanlar, Ganja for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bagbanlar, Ganja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagbanlar, Ganja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Techie3 (talk) 11:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Norval, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norval, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norval, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 02:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
The article Kichik Vedi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This city might not even exist. Google Maps doesn't have it, I can't find anything mentioning it, and the article consists of a single sentence.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TL | The Legend talk 01:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
"Drias (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Drias (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 19#Drias (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Aberdeen, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Alico, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Talus, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Rocking K, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Linnie, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Bartlett, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Blackrock, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Mock, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
The article Kearsarge, California has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Nomination of Bradford Siding, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradford Siding, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradford Siding, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Scranton, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scranton, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scranton, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Clark, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clark, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clark, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of 9 Mile Station, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 9 Mile Station, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9 Mile Station, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lane Mill, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lane Mill, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane Mill, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Peterson Mill, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peterson Mill, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peterson Mill, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 23:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Intake, Inyo County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intake, Inyo County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intake, Inyo County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 01:29, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Intake, Butte County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intake, Butte County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intake, Butte County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tule Station, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tule Station, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tule Station, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 04:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Stewarts, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stewarts, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewarts, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sykes, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sykes, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sykes, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Skyes, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyes, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sykes, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 18:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Nomination of Monola, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monola, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monola, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Jay, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Sycamore Crossing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Doesn't appear on topos. Most of the newspapers.com hits for this name are for a probably non-notable subdivision in Orange, California. The rest are for literal river crossing, although mostly in other areas. Probably a literal river crossing, fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Wagstaff, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad station, not a community. See [9], [10]. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tuttle, Colusa County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuttle, Colusa County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuttle, Colusa County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Hershey, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hershey, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hershey, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Genevra, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genevra, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevra, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Denco, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denco, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denco, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Dolan, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Yet another WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG-failing "former settlement". Not on topos, no GNIS entry, not in Gudde, newspapers.com is just last names.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lurline, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lurline, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lurline, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Oak Flat, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Can't find such a place marked on topos, not in Gudde, no GNIS entry, newspapers.com isn't bringing up anything super meaningful. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. We need more than just a vague entry in Durham to demonstrate that GEOLAND is met here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Levee Spur, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Levee Spur, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Levee Spur, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Fig Orchard, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Probably non-notable. Topos show an isolated spot with a maximum of two buildings. Not in Gudde and newspapers.com hits are for literal fig orchards, which this may well have been.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Treves, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Treves, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treves, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 16:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Into the same discussion have also been bundled
The article Sorrell's, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a Sorrells Ranch at the supposed location, which is never developed into a community and is eventually covered over by the small Kelso Valley Airport. As apparently a ranch, not a community, WP:GEOLAND is failed.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sand Cut, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sand Cut, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sand Cut, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sedwell, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sedwell, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedwell, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Also included are the following:
The article Dyer Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Perhaps unsurprisingly, this seems to have been somebody's farm or house. [11], [12], etc.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Artwell, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artwell, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artwell, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 16:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Cabernet, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cabernet, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabernet, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Millers Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show it as an old river landing. There never appears to have been an actual community here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:29, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Fraziers Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Like Millers Landing, California, this is/was a river landing on the Sacramento River. Fails WP:GEOLAND, not a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Boyers Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Like Millers Landing, California, this is/was a river landing on the Sacramento River. Never a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Cambio, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cambio, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambio, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 23:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Code, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Code, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 23:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Eaires, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eaires, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaires, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 23:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Fluhr, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an undeveloped siding; some even call it "Fluhr Siding". Fails WP:GEOLAND; this was never an actual community or a former settlement.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gamba, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamba, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamba, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Cortena, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cortena, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cortena, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Inmans, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inmans, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inmans, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kyan, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyan, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyan, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Leonards, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonards, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonards, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Levee, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Undeveloped railroad feature on a levee, see topographic maps. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Nadeau, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadeau, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeau, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:16, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Solon, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Just a siding serving a clay plant according to the topos, some of which even call it Solon Siding. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Neil, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Nome, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, probably a railroad siding: see [13]. Fails WP:GEOLAND. No GNIS entry, Gudde calls it a "railroad name in the desert". Doesn't really seem like a significant location at all.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Reservoir, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topographic maps, and no evidence of human habitation or development aside from the railroad tracks at the site. Appears to fail WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 18:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Trescape, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trescape, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trescape, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 19:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaffee, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaffee, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaffee, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 19:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Slater, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding, not a community, see [14].
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Page, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated, largely undeveloped portion of the railroad. Searching newspapers.com brings up nothing but noise due to how common the word page is, but with nothing called page marked on the topos, and nothing resembling a community at the supposed location, it's pretty clear WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Paloma, Kern County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paloma, Kern County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paloma, Kern County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Parsons, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, no GNIS entry, appears to have been some sort of railroad feature.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Petro, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
See [15], it's a railroad siding near where Standard Oil had some storage tanks. Never any signs of development beyond that here, not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Pine, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Evidently not a community, as there's no GNIS entry (and GNIS lists basically everything). The supposed location is where the railroad goes through an uninhabited desert, so there aren't even buildings where this "former settlement" supposedly was, and the topos go back to 1915. This looks to fail WP:GEOLAND, which is no surprise, given that the page creator has created dozens of stubs like this claiming that uninhabited railroad features are "former settlements".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Proctor, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Never an actual community here on the maps, which just show the tracks, Proctor Lake, a couple boundary markers, and a "solid waste disposal plant". There's no evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Redrock, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redrock, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redrock, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:32, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Shady Rest, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shady Rest, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shady Rest, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Strader, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not marked on topos, no evidence of there being a community there, no GNIS entry. We need more than a Durham entry about a point on the railroad to demonstrate that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Strand, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an undeveloped siding on the railroad. Not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND. Map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Sullivan, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Also an uninhabited railroad siding, fails WP:GEOLAND. See [16].
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Summit, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad turning wye, not a community. See [17] and [18]. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
"Intake, California" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Intake, California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 6#Intake, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 20:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Teagle, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topographic maps show an uninhabited railroad siding at the spot, which isn't surprising given the sheer number of sidings mislabeled as community in Category:Former settlements in Kern County, California. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 21:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Ansel, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a long siding on the railroad with no buildings, doesn't seem to be a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 21:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Bayley, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad spur going to a set of two buildings labeled as "storage bin" on later topos. Before the railroad, the area was an uninhabited swamp. This never seems to have been an actual community, WP:GEOLAND is not met. See WP:GNIS for further information.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 22:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Doles, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The directions lead to an uninhabited and undeveloped point on the railroad with nothing around. Possibly an error for Boles, California, which is about half a mile away from the supposed location of this. I'm seeing no evidence this passes WP:GEOLAND. Additionally, Boles is quite possibly non-notable as well, as it appears to be a siding.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 22:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Boles, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uninhabited railroad siding, not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND. See [19] and [20].
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 23:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Fletcher, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding with a water tank, not a community. Site is uninhabited before the railroad comes through, with the feature clearly marked as "Fletcher Siding" on some topos. Railroad feature in the middle of nowhere, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 23:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ghent, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghent, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghent, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 00:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Glass Mountain, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glass Mountain, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glass Mountain, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 00:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Cantrall Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show this as a literal mill, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 00:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Kephart, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos just show an uninhabited railroad siding at this point, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Hollenbeck, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollenbeck, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollenbeck, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 04:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Mattes, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mattes, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattes, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Paola, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
According to the topos, all that's here is a railroad siding, a well, and a storage bin. An aerial photograph I managed to turn up agrees with that assessment. No community ever here, uninhabited before the siding. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:16, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Suty, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos call it in the "Suty Grain Elevator" and seem to show a small siding there. It's on a reclaimed lake bed, and there's no residences in the immediate area. Never a settlement here, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Widgeon, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Widgeon, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widgeon, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of No Mirage, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article No Mirage, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Mirage, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 15:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bradtmoore, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradtmoore, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradtmoore, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 16:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Butlers, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The name of Butlers appears to be an error, as all of the topos show the place as Butters. It's consistently in a different typeset than is used for actual communities. No buildings appear in the area until quite recently, when a very long row of them does. Google maps shows this to be a pig farm, with the long row of buildings being a row of shelters or sheds housing the pigs. Fails WP:GEOLAND. Tried searching on newspapers.com in Imperial County papers, the only hit for Butters was a last name.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 16:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Gleason, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos call it Gleason switch, and show it as a railroad feature with no accompanying community. Newspapers.com results are for a local politician named I. W. Gleason. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 16:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Please don't create any more articles edit
Carlossuarez46: Please stop creating articles until you have participated in the cleanup of your previous articles.
I realize that perhaps you created in good faith all of the articles above that are AfD'd or PROD'd. However, there has been an immense amount of work done to evaluate these articles and delete them. At the very least, you should be participating in the discussion. Ideally, for every article you create, you would evaluate a few of your previous articles and see if they are sufficiently notable. Could you please help clean up this mess? If you want to get started, then try looking List of counties in California and reviewing the places in each county. Cxbrx (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Cxbrx. It doesn't look like Carlos has created anything close to an article since July. Also, for some context, Wikipedia was a little different when he created the majority of the articles that are now at AFD. That isn't to say that they should not be re-examined. I also agree that he may want to help and/or participate in the discussions. Just thought I'd throw my 2c in. I value the work Carlos has done on Wikipedia and hope he sticks around. Killiondude (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- Cxbrx you're entitled to your opinion, but it isn't binding and is contrary to WP's dictates. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- No, it was not different. We had requirements for verification, we had requirements for notability, we had requirements for information being factual yet we get crap like "Mock is an unincorporated community in Inyo County, California." Does this location look like a community to you? Does Mock's label on the topo map look like a community to you? Carlos has made hundreds if not thousands of false articles, and he just laughs at the time he's wasting of those who care about accuracy and notability. Killiondude, "when he created the articles", Carlos was informed in a discussion that this mass-creation was of questionable factual accuracy and questionable notability, yet he completely dismissed them, as he continues to do now, even as roughly 350 California articles have been brought to AFD so far, not to mention the PRODs, merges, and redirects done outside it. Is it "not binding" that we shouldn't falsely say a railroad siding and gravel pit is a community? Is it "contrary to WP's dictates" that a railroad junction (lots of those) shouldn't incorrectly be listed as a community? Is it just an "opinion" that Big Mountain Ridge is actually a ridge, Kettleman Station an oil pump station, Flourney a ranch, etc. etc. etc. rather than the communities he falsely claimed them to be? There's many more that need to go, and these are only the mass-creations in parts of California we've gotten to so far. Reywas92Talk 04:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Okay. Killiondude (talk) 05:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Agree with Reywas92. This is like discovering a massive toxic waste dump that’s going to take years to clean up. So many places (thousands?) labelled as inhabited that blatantly are not and which should not be the subject of articles.
- No-one is forced to edit Wiki so we can’t ask this admin to clean up their own mess, but morally they ought to be doing the right thing rather than dumping all this work onto other people. EDIT: it should be noted that in many cases Carlossuarez46 can actually speedy delete their own articles via G7 and save everyone the trouble of having to spend a week+ at AFD for each article. For nearly all of the problem articles created by them they are the only contributor. FOARP (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
So I finally got ahold of Carlos, Durham's California's Geographic Names, Carlos's source for most of these. Here's the entry for Lakeview Junction, California, citing to page 391: "Lakeview Junction [MODOC]: locality, 1 mile south-southeast of downtown Alturas along Southern Pacific Railroad (lat. 41o38'30 N, long. 120o32'05 W; near S line sec. 13, T 42 N, R 12 E). Named on Alturas (1961) 15' quadrangle." How in the hell did you get "Lakeview Junction is an unincorporated community" out of that? "Locality" is defined on p. 1493 as "A place that has past or present cultural associations." on Google Maps and the topo map show a railroad junction. Again, why the hell did you create this article calling it a community? How about Scarface, California [21], Hollenbeck, California, and Surprise Station, California? All "localities" in Durham, not communities.
How about the "former settlement" Bartons House, California, which cites page 462: "Strawberry Valley: village...Wescoatt's (1861) map shows a place called Bartons House located 1.5 miles southwest of Strawberry Valley."? Why should there be an article for this?
Or "unincorporated community" Juniper, California, citing p. 389: "Juniper [MODOC]: locality, nearly 2 miles west-southwest of downtown Alturas along Southern Pacific Railroad..."?
Let's try Daby's Ferry, California, citing p. 10: "Arcata [HUMBOLDT]:...S. Daby established Daby's Ferry 5 miles north of Union (present Arcata)..." Sure Mr. Daby ran the ferry, but what makes this a notable settlement? Why is this a ghost town in Template:Humboldt County, California?
Is it merely my "opinion" that the content of these articles does not match the source you cited? There are hundreds of these. Was it "WP's dictates" that you should be so negligent in claiming that Paola, California "is an unincorporated community"? I don't think it was okay to put false information in Wikipedia in 2009 either, and it's repugnant that "Okay" is all you have to say about this deliberate misrepresentation of sources, Killiondude. I sure don't value this "work". This mess needs to be fixed without continuing the presence of false and questionably notable material on Wikipedia and without continuing to waste people's time. Reywas92Talk 22:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Whilst I wouldn't use Reywas92's exact tone, I share and support their sentiments here. These articles were created whilst Carlossuarez46 was an admin and bound by WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT. I don't think I am being unfair in saying that the creation of these articles did not reflect good judgement. They were still creating them up until relatively recently (cf. the large number of classic Roman/Greek articles that appear to be cited only to a couple of maps with no real WP:GNG) even whilst WP:GEOLAND was a guideline. I don't intend to badger on this topic, but it would certainly help inspire confidence in their continued adminship if they could help clear up the issue they have created, particularly by speedy deleting via G7 the problematic articles for which they are the only substantial contributor. FOARP (talk) 12:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- PS - one other thing they could do to help is indicate whether they still wish to be notified about PRODs/AFDs related to these California stubs. Not having to continually add to the many hundreds of notices on this page would save time. FOARP (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Dinsmores, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinsmores, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinsmores, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 04:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Note that the following articles have also been nominated under the above discussion:
- 18 Mile House, California
- Abbato, California
- Abbott House, California
- Achois, California
- Acuragna, California
- Agatha, California
- Ahapchingas, California
- Alamo Bonito, California
- Alcant, California
- Algodon, California
- Allard, California
- Alpine (former settlement), California
- Amador Crossing, California
- Andover, California
- Andrews, California
- Appleton, California
- Araz, California
- Arctic, California
- Argentine, California
- Arkansas Ferry, California
- Armstrong's Mill, California
- Artwell, California
- Arundel, California
- Ash, California
- Astakiwi, California
- Balaklava, California
- Bald Eagle, California
- Baltimore, California
- Banner, Kings County, California
- Barkerville, California
- Barnes Settlement, California
- Bartons House, California
- Beal, California
- Bean, California
- Bear River Pines, California
- Bear Valley, Nevada County, California
- Beckmans Flat, California
- Bellevue, California
- Bells Bar, California
- Bender, California
- Berteleda, California
- Bidwell, California
- Big Blue Mill, California
- Big Ripples, California
- Birch, California
- Blinzing, California
- Bliss, California
- Blue Bluffs, California
- Bokea, California
- Bontes, California
- Brighton House, California
- Britona, California
- Brock Creek, California
- Bronge, California
- Brownsville, Calaveras County, California
- Bryan, California
- Bryant, Humboldt County, California
- Buchanan, Madera County, California
- Buldam, California
- Bullards Bar, California
- Burchell, California
- Burkeville, California
- Burks Bar, California
- Butler, California
- Butte Creek, California
- Caldwell, California
- Caleb, California
- California House, California
- Cambio, California
- Camp 4 Flat, California
- Camp 19, California
- Camp Pendola, Yuba County, California
- Camp Spaulding, California
- Camp Union, California
- Canebrake (former town), California
- Canfield, California
- Canton, California
- Cape Cod Bar, California
- Cape Horn Bar, California
- Carbon, California
- Carthage, California
- Cascade Diggings, California
- Cedar Kress, California
- Center Ville, California
- Ceres Flat, California
- Champion, California
- Chandler, California
- Chaparral Hill, California
- Chases, California
- Chicken Flat, California
- Chili Bar, California
- China Gulch, California
- Chinatown, Amador County, California
- Christine Junction, California
- Cincinnati, California
- Clayton, Los Angeles County, California
- Clear Creek, Butte County, California
- Clearbrook, California
- Colbys Landing, California
- Collins, Fresno County, California
- Colorado, California
- Concepcíon, California
- Coombs, California
- Copper Hill, California
- Copperfield, California
- Cordua Bar, California
- Cornwell, California
- Crittendon, California
- Crouch, California
- Crow, California
- Crystal Springs, California
- Cucamonga (former settlement), California
- Cuneo, California
- Curtis, Yolo County, California
- Daby's Ferry, California
- Dapishul, California
- Darwin, Fresno County, California
- Dathol, California
- David, California
- Deadwood, Siskiyou County, California
- Dedrick, California
- Delaney, California
- Dellavan, California
- Denco, California
- Dentens, California
- Depot Hill, California
- Deseret, California
- Desert Relief, California
- Dew Drop, Amador County, California
- Diamond Creek, California
- Dickenson, California
- Dickerson, California
- Diggers Bar, California
- Dillon, California
- Dredge, California
- Drum, Nevada County, California
- Dufftown, California
- Dunlap, Mendocino County, California
The article Whitmore Hot Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Hot Springs not a community: [22]. Notability not established.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 04:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Mayflower, Imperial County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Clear GNIS mapreading error. All of the topos show a Mayflower canal that goes through Wiest, California, but while the word Mayflower is near the buildings at Wiest, the font and location make it clear it's referring to the very minor canal that's more of a drainage ditch. Fails WP:GEOLAND, clearly not a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Zentner, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zentner, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zentner, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Old Ornbaun Hot Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not established with substantive sources for hot springs
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Lakeview Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad junction not a community. Durham p. 391 does NOT call this a populated place, it calls it a "locality".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:54, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Yuba Pass, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Content misrepresents source: p. 580 of Durham calls this a "locality" with no indication it was a settlement whatsoever. topo map likewise shows a pass the railroad and highway run through, not a settlement.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Packwood, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated single building down an unpaved road to nowhere. Durham calls it an isolated locality that was also known as Packwood's. Newspapers.com search didn't really bring up anything useful. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG, seems to have been somebody's ranch/farm/homestead.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Scarface, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Durham calls it a "locality", which does not pass WP:GEOLAND, topos show a railroad siding. Not a community, nor is it notable.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Prospero, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding with minimal development, some even have it in a typeface reserved for non-communities and call it "Prospero Siding". WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Stevens, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Guess what this is! An undeveloped siding [23]. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Shipp, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an undeveloped point on the railroad, there never seems to have actually been a community here. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Hunter Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a single building in a clearing and mark it in a font used for individual ranches. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Brooks Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a literal mill site. Not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Venola, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venola, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venola, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Crome, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crome, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crome, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ceneda, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceneda, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceneda, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Conner, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conner, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conner, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sonora Junction, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonora Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonora Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Carlossuarez46 - In addition to the above, I think in view of the hundreds of notifications you have already received, and the hundreds more that are likely to occur, it might be a good idea if you can indicate whether you still wish to be notified about these AFDs/PRODs related to the California stubs you created in 2009. Not having to post these notices would certainly help. FOARP (talk) 14:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Kernell, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited railroad siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Landco, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Landco, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landco, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lonsmith, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lonsmith, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonsmith, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Elmo, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a rail siding, which is confirmed by this. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ribier, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ribier, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ribier, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Silt, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated railroad siding in the middle of the desert. Not a community, and WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ferrin, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferrin, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferrin, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of La Branza, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Branza, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Branza, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Burchell, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burchell, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burchell, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Kayandee, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayandee, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayandee, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Sullivan, California edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sullivan, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm Bacon 23:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Jastro, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a spur going to a collection of oil tanks at a refinery, newspapers.com hits are for a local politician with this last name. Doesn't seem to have ever been a community, fails WP:GEOLAND. I tracked down a 1978 aerial, which also just shows the spur, some circular oil tanks, the the refinery buildings.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 23:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Harpertown, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding with some oil tanks. Newspapers.com results are for computer equipment. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 23:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Lone Star Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Locality is not notable; irresponsible mass-creation without siginificant sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 02:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Spellacy, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spellacy, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellacy, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Hollis, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited railroad siding here, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Palmo, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, the newspapers.com hits are for stuff being shipped from a point on the railroad with this name and a reference to a Palmo Siding [24]. Siding and shipping point does not meet WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Astakiwi, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astakiwi, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astakiwi, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 04:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sellew, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sellew, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sellew, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Normandy Village, Berkeley, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Normandy Village, Berkeley, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normandy Village, Berkeley, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 04:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Araz, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Araz, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Araz, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 04:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kalanov edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kalanov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aoyoigian (talk) 04:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gulf, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gulf, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gosford, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gosford, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gosford, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Bannister, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Bissell, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The topos show two nearby points named Bissell: one is a railroad siding, the other is an undeveloped point on the railroad. Neither meets WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bradys, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradys, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradys, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 07:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Seguro, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a siding on the Southern Pacific, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Five Points, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show no buildings at the site, which is where five unpaved roads meet in the middle of nowhere. Google Maps shows no buildings nearby. Newspapers.com hits are passing mentions of an oil field apparently elsewhere. This fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Warren (near Fellows), California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Isolated point on the railroad with no real development, disappears when the railroad does. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article San Emidio, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated point on the railroad, newspapers.com hits are for the San Emidio Ranch.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of 18 Mile House, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 18 Mile House, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18 Mile House, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Allard, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allard, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allard, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 06:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Five Points, Plumas County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Utterly fails WP:GEOLAND. As the article says, this is where a few trails meet each other in a national forest.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Copic, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated siding with a couple warehouse buildings. The inclusion of the California Historic Landmark in this article is misleading, as the historic point is a separate, unrelated site known as "Fremont's Camp" with a modern address in Tulelake, California. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Ambrose, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited rail siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Campbell, Modoc County, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campbell, Modoc County, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbell, Modoc County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Dalton, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a rail siding. The California Historical Landmark information is completely irrelevant, as that landmark is over five miles away and is completely unrelated. Dalton itself is just a WP:GEOLAND-failing railroad feature.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Demuth, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show two buildings along the railroad in the middle of a isolated portion of a lava bed. The sole hit on newspapers.com in Modoc County papers is for a local landowner, Google Books doesn't have any significant information. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Hannchen, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a siding and a collection of buildings labelled as a grain elevator. Newspapers.com results are for types of barley. No evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Homestead, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a mostly undeveloped railroad feature, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Kalina, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a rail siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Kandra, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited rail siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Liskey, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited rail siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Tuber, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited rail siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Meares, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met. Not a community at all.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Moseman, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, which just show an isolated ranch in the area. The four newspapers.com hits in Kern County, CA are for names, and Google books results are passing mentions of Moseman Stage Station. Appears to have been an isolated stage station that fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 17:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Reynolds Place, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Based on the topos, this seems to have been an individual ranch. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Bluegum, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bluegum, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluegum, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Maltha, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maltha, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maltha, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 17:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The article East Arboga, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, which is supported by newspapers.com results such as [25]. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Little Dixie, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Dixie, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Dixie, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:30, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Big Blue Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Newspapers.com results make it obvious that this is a literal mill. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Vaccaro, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad spur with two buildings. Newspapers.com hits call the site "Vaccaro Station", the only development described there is a packing plant for a fruit company. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Vernette, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sourced only to Durham, which is automatically cause for concern. No GNIS entry, newspapers.com results are for a depot/non-agency station built just outside of Fellows (possibly in an attempt to get extra fare costs). Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 07:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Five Points, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Points, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Indian Camp, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No such feature on the topos. Newspapers.com hits are for various literal Native American camps, I'm not seeing evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Wyo, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a siding and a railroad spur going to the gravel pit. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Rotavele, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Lone Star, Glenn County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show this for what it truly is: a campground within Mendocino National Forest, with no apparent permanent dwellings. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:50, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Logandale, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a siding with a single warehouse, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:52, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Grapit, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Siding and a spur at a gravel pit, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Fiddlers Green, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiddlers Green, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Dogtown, Glenn County, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogtown, Glenn County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Cory, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 07:10, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
"Algodon, California" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Algodon, California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 25#Algodon, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 07:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Kurand, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding, not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 21:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Lyman, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Some sort of railroad feature, not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 21:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Union Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal ocean landing, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:31, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Millers Ranch, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millers Ranch, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Algoso, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algoso, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Magunden, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algoso, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Jesbel, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesbel, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Junction, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
From all indications, this is/was just a literal junction. There's nothing at this site besides a junction, per the topos, and entries sourced only to Durham have proved to be very dubious at many AFDs.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Fountain, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
It's the Fountain Ranch, not a community - [26]. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Northern Redwood Camp, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literally a campsite in a national forest, per the topos, which put it in a typeface reserved for non-community places.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Lockharts, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockharts, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Herbert, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, no evidence there was ever a community here. WP:GEOLAND doesn't seem to be met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Hillside, Madera County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS entry is sourced to Durham, and the name doesn't appear on topos. Incredibly common name makes it basically impossible to search for, but no indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lankershim, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS entry is sourced to a low-quality map. Topos show an uninhabited railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lincoln, Madera County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Medano, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ovejo, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovejo, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Plains, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
GNIS entry sourced to Durham. Topos show basically nothing there, there's currently a farm here. The name does not appear on pre-GNIS topographic aps and the coordinates given in GNIS aren't even on the railroad. No evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Talbot, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated railroad siding and a couple windmills. WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
The article Baker Soda Spring, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:V/WP:N/WP:GEOLAND: Durham describes this as "a small spring of carbonated water" as a passing mention under entry for Lower Lake, NOT as a settlement.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of West Baker, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Baker, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Kecks Corner, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to have been a T intersection where somebody had a farm known as the Antelope Ranch, looks to fail WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:17, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bretona edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bretona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The page Bryant, California has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The page Buchanan, California has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Bethel, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A classic fourth-class post office: the post office was named Bethel because that was the name of the guy whose store briefly held people's mail for them, not because there was a notable community or settlement by this name. Another WP:TROUT for the negligent creator who lied about the source, which says under the entry for North Fork, "Postal authorities established Bethel post office 4 miles west of North Fork in 1881 and discontinued it in 1885; James W. Bethel owned the store that housed the post office", but where does it mention this being the name of a separately notable settlement? Fails WP:GEOLAND
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 08:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Borax Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
More lying and negligent misrepresentation of source by irresponsible mass-producer: Durham just says "Irelan noted that Borax Springs, named for the borate content of the water, were situated on the edge of Clear Lake", NOT that this was a settlement or notable in any way.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 20:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Hoppins Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
More misrepresenation of source: Durham says under entry for Bartlett Springs, "A small resort called Hoppins Springs was situated...it consisted of two small springs and several cottages", not that it was a notable settlement that was "also" a resort. It was just a non-notable resort.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 20:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Elliott Springs, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Blatant misrepresentation of source: Durham says under Highland Springs, "California Mining Bureau's map shows a place called Elliot Springs... Waring noted that England Springs is another named for Elliott Springs–the name 'England' is from the first owner of the place". Negligent mass-producer misconstrued this as a somehow notable "settlement", not mentioned in the source, and falsely said the name "honors" the former owners when source does not say that. Why isn't this user banned yet?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 20:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Cuba, Merced County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a long railroad siding here, but no community. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Edendale, Merced County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an isolated point on the railroad. Newspapers.com hits are all for the former neighborhood in Los Angeles or a creek. This only briefly mentions it. This suggests it was a point on the railroad. Either way, no evidence that WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Gadwall, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a single building along the railroad that's later the location of the Los Banos Gun Club, newspapers.com hits in Merced County are all for a type of duck. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:29, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Gracey, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This name does not appear on topographic maps in the supposed location at all, and newspapers.com hits in Merced County are all for last names and a room in a library. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Hoff, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a small railroad siding, looks to fail WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Linora, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding with a single building. There's a Linora oil pumping station south of the siding. Newspapers.com are for the oil pumping station and a Linora Dairy/Stock Farm. Not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 21:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Marguerite, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding with two buildings. Newspapers.com results in Merced County are entirely references to a city street and people with this name. Evidently no community here, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 22:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Nairn, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding. Not a community, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 22:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Tenger, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No Tenger at the site, but the topos show a railroad spur and a couple buildings named Tegner. It evidently was a station, see [27]. A couple newspapers results call it the "Tegner district", showing that Tegner was evidently just an informal region related to the railroad station and spur. This doesn't meet WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 22:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Alta Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only one blue-linked entry, and that entry is a redirect to a page that doesn't mention it, so the one blue link doesn't meet WP:DABMENTION. There's nothing to disambiguate at this title.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Heather Glen, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Evidently not a community. There's nothing really there on the topos, and its consistently shown in the sans-serif font used by the USGS for non-community map features.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The article McCulloh, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a single building in the middle of El Dorado National Forest, might be the same thing as a McCulloh prison camp located in the forest mentioned here. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:45, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Kasson, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The one source - Durham - doesn't mention a community at this site, just a short-lived post office. All I've been able to locate in my WP:BEFORE about this place is an announcement from 1879 that the Kasson post office was opened, and one from a few months later that the post office closed. I'm not convinced that WP:GEOLAND is met, and WP:GNG sure ain't.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
"Alta Vista, Inyo County, California" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alta Vista, Inyo County, California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 9#Alta Vista, Inyo County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
"Alta Vista, California" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alta Vista, California. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 9#Alta Vista, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Kargi, Iran for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kargi, Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Bonadelle Ranchos Five, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonadelle Ranchos Five, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Bonadelle Ranchos Nine, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonadelle Ranchos Nine, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Tillman, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding with no development, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 05:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Clarkson, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sole source (Durham) doesn't call it a settlement, and my searches yesterday turned up nothing calling this a settlement either. No evidence WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Craft, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sole source (Durham) doesn't call it a settlement, and my searches yesterday turned up nothing calling this a settlement either. No evidence WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Cuttens, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sole source (Durham) doesn't call it a settlement, and my searches yesterday turned up nothing calling this a settlement either. No evidence WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 01:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Willow Point, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal point of land between a canal and a slough in the Yolo Basin, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Knights Landing Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No such feature on the topos, newspapers.com results suggest a literal junction where the was a gas station that functioned as a bus stop. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Arroz, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur with a warehouse, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Central, Yolo County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Coniston, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Morgans Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topographic maps show this in a typeface used for literal river landings. Not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Tyndall Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal river landing, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Eastham, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, no GNIS entry, not in Gudde's place names book, newspapers.com results are for names, Eastham's Cigar Store, and Eastham ridge. No sign of a community here, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Fourness, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, no GNIS entry, not in Gudde, newspapers.com results are all for last names. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met, or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Garlic, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No "Garlic" at the supposed location, but there is an uninhabited point on the railroad named "Garic". Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Hebron, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show two small railroad spurs, a home, and a couple non-residence buildings. Newspapers.com refers to a Hebron farm near the supposed location of this place. [28]. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Kobe, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uninhabited railroad point in the desert, not a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Wycoff, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show an uninhabited point on the railroad in the desert, newspapers.com results in Yolo County are a single reference to the Wycoff Ranch and a few hits for names. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Eagle, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
More false content, there's no town at the site, only an isolated school. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and WP:GEOLAND are not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 03:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Philbrick Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal mill site, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 04:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Echo, Mendocino County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sole source, Durham, calls it a place and references a "Echo Ranch", not states there was a community here. I can't find anything else traceable to this specific spot, no indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Emory, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, sole source calls it a "place", not a settlement, no evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Elevenmile, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
It didn't contain a stagecoach stop, it was a stagecoach stop, per what Durham actually says. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:22, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Eightmile, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Misrepresentation of sole source, which doesn't call it a settlement, just a vague "place". No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 06:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tasi edit
A tag has been placed on Tasi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
{{Db-move|page to be moved|reason}}
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Firestar464 (talk) 06:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, technical issues arose. You can ignore this now. Firestar464 (talk) 06:58, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Oakhurst, Fresno County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to be an old railroad siding, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Tanoak, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The topo this appears on literally calls it "Tanoak (siding)". Railroad siding utterly fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Smiths, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Nothing on topos, no GNIS entry, no indication of a community ever being here, let alone a notable one. WP:GEOLAND does not appear to be met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Oilville, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, no GNIS entry, newspapers.com hits seem to be largely referring to a location in Kern County. The Durham source has proven to be problematic for demonstrating a WP:GEOLAND pass in the past, and there's no evidence of one here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Indian Springs, Kern County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Source Durham says "Johnson's map shows some springs, called Indian Springs, situated 2.5 miles east of Rosamond." so why did this incompetent, unrepentant mass-creator of junk call this "a former settlement"?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:38, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Joneso, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:V/WP:N/WP:GEOLAND: not in GNIS and Durham does not describe it as a notable community (passing mention under entry for Hardwick). Recreation welcome with significant sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Spreckels Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is a railroad junction, not a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Knowles Junction, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is a road junction [29], not a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lafayette Hill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As usual, the creator here misrepresented the source. Durham says "Gudde listed a mining place called Lafayette Hill located 2 miles south of Grass Valley," not "mining settlement." No indication Lafayette Hill was a notable community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lillian, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Kind reminder that when the source says "Postal authorities established Lillian post office 6 miles southwest of Canby and discontinued it in 1882", you should not miscontrue this to "A post office operated at Lillian from 1881 to 1882." This was the name of the short-lived post office, and there is not evidence that it was the name of a community. Only newspapers.com result is for the closure of the post office. Fails WP:V/WP:N/WP:GEOLAND: not in GNIS and Durham does not describe it as a notable community. Recreation welcome with significant sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lippitt, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Durham says "Colonel Francis J. Lippitt occupied a military post called Littitt that functioned at Bucksport for a few months in 1862" so why was this miscontrued as "a former settlement and military post...near the settlement of Bucksport"? This is blatantly false, it was "at" Bucksport, not "near" it, and was not a independently notable settlement in addition to being a post. I don't see significant coverage for the short-lived military camp either.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Little Rattlesnake Bar, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Source Durham calls it "a mining place" not a settlement. No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Minear, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:V/WP:N/WP:GEOLAND: not in GNIS and Durham does not describe it as a notable community (passing mention under entry for Jerseydale). Durham does not say the name "honors" Milnear, just that it was named for him (as people would go to his place to pick up their mail). Recreation welcome with significant sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 22:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Eagle, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Speedy deletion nomination of Sierra Vista, California edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Sierra Vista, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm Talk 03:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Milton Hills, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Subdivision fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 04:24, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Shamrock, Imperial County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 06:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Clare Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal mill site fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 15:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Mathews Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal mill site fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 15:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mosabi edit
Hello Carlossuarez46,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mosabi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lithopsian (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
My mistake, didn't realise it was converted from a valid redirect. Speedy withdrawn and redirect reinstated. Lithopsian (talk) 16:03, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Ramsey Crossing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos and newspapers.com results suggest a literal river crossing, no indication of a community, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 18:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Colbys Landing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Mass-creator misrepresented the source. Durham says under entry for Chico, "Colbys Landing, named for a proprietor, was a shipping point situated...." NOT that it was a community of any notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 01:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
"Chaffe" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chaffe. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Chaffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Haselbusch, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Single building along the railroad, newspapers.com brings up a levee and a ranch. No evidence of a community here, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 15:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Blinzing, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur with a water tank. Sole newspapers.com hit referring to this is a railroad foreman's house. Not in Gudde, found a Google books result calling it a shipping point on the railroad. No evidence of a community here, fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 15:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Bloomer, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, which is consistent with newspapers.com results. See [30], [31], etc. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 16:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Gimbal, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimbal, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Hume, Butte County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 16:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Land, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 16:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lorraine, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad spur with no accompanying community fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 16:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Losee, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Losee, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
"Bontes" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bontes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 26#Bontes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Luce, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not on topos, not in Gudde, no GNIS entry, newspapers.com results are last names. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 17:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Sorroca, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding, which is also what it is referred to as on newspapers.com [32]. Fails WP:GEOLAND. Railroad feature, not a community.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 17:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Saxon, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding with a single building fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 17:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Peethill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad spur on the edge of the Broderick neighborhood of West Sacramento. Newspapers.com results are all scanner errors for Foothill. No evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 17:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shamrock, California edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shamrock, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm Talk 18:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aliabad County geography stubs edit
A tag has been placed on Category:Aliabad County geography stubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
It would be good if Carlos could respond edit
Hi Carlossuarez46, it would certainly save a lot of people's time if you could indicate here whether you still wish to be notified about PRODing/AFDing of California GNIS stubs, as it would mean these stubs need no longer be posted. There are now more than 500 notices on this page and more are being added all the time, each takes time to add, and there are thousands more to go. I don't intend to badger on this subject, but admins are supposed to be responsive and accountable, and refusing to engage at all with the issues that your mass-creation of WP:GEOLAND-failing stubs has caused definitely falls short of this standard. FOARP (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- So far, nothing has called for a response. Many, but not all, of the PRODs and AFDs have resulted in deletion. Do you expect that I need to oppose each? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- The question is whether you still want to be notified about these PRODs for California GNIS stubs. Posting notices here increases the labour of removing all these WP:GEOLAND fails, and it would save time (and prevent your talk page being cluttered) if you could indicate that you don't want to be notified about them. Removing them yourself en bloc as their author via G7 is also very possible as very few have had any further work done on them since creation. FOARP (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- You can dispense with notifying me. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- The question is whether you still want to be notified about these PRODs for California GNIS stubs. Posting notices here increases the labour of removing all these WP:GEOLAND fails, and it would save time (and prevent your talk page being cluttered) if you could indicate that you don't want to be notified about them. Removing them yourself en bloc as their author via G7 is also very possible as very few have had any further work done on them since creation. FOARP (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Misión, Sonora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Complete failure of WP:V. I can't find any indication that this is actually a settlement. GNIS has coords, but they're wrong - they're in Chihuahua, not Sonora, and they clearly point to an area of complete wilderness. I was not able to find any other indication of a place with this name in Sonora.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lovdal, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad siding outside of West Sacramento, WP:GEOLAND is not met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 22:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Lund, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I am baffled as to what GNIS thinks is here. The coordinates show two buildings next to a levee, but the topos never give the site a name. No indication that WP:GEOLAND is met, probably a GNIS compiling error.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 22:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Green, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This name never appears on topographic maps, and the only thing at these coordinates is a benchmark point on a levee. No indication of a community here, WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 22:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Dufour, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Topos show a railroad spur and a warehouse, likely the Dufour warehouse mentioned here.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 01:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Daisie, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisie, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Greendale, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Railroad siding with a warehouse fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 01:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
"not useful or meaningful" edit
RE:Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_5#Category:Hong_Kong_people_of_Lower_Yangtze_descent: Excuse me, but did you even read the category and article or are you just feeding your confirmation biases? I suggest not voting until you inform yourself of the subject matter.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- I also don't think it's very civil to call something "useful" or "meaningful," and these arguments border on WP:IDONTLIKE.--Prisencolin (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Your defense is purely WP:ILIKEIT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Um, no? I clearly show how the category I'm seeking to create is supported by scholarly literature and other reliable sources. Did you see the part where there is a literal list of people who would be included in this category seen in this article.--Prisencolin (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Your defense is purely WP:ILIKEIT. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Anyways I’d like to kindly ask that you and @William Allen Simpson: strike the terms “useless” and “useless and absurd” respectively from your comments in that thread, and refrain from using such terms again, as suggested in the WP:CIVILITY guideline WP:RUC.—Prisencolin (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Carlossuarez46: I'm assuming you've already read this because you've commented on another CFD that I'm also in (using a similarly pejorative phrase "meaningless" I may add). As I already told William Allen Simpson I will give it a few more hours to take action to remove WP:ATA language, as @RevelationDirect: has already done, if not I will be reporting to WP:ANI.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Go ahead. You will not intimidate me. There is no usefulness or meaning to these categories as the debate seems to show. At WP:ANI I will ask that you be prohibited from interacting on the talk pages of participants in CFDs as clearly prohibited by WP:CANVASS Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm perfectly fine with interacting with CFD participants solely on the CFD page, the only reason I messaged each one of you specifically was because it had to do with the tone of your arguments and I didn't want those issues to escalate in areas where it wasn't relevant.--Prisencolin (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Dunderberg Mill, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Literal mill site fails WP:GEOLAND. References are all either unreliable or not significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 02:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
ANI edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Prisencolin (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've attached a comment to your "Descent categories" essay which can be found on the talk page. Please read.--Prisencolin (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Patrick Creek, California for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Creek, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Creek, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of English Bar, California edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on English Bar, California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm Talk 02:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Oleander (former town), California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleander (former town), California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Manzariyeh Petrol Depot, Isfahan for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manzariyeh Petrol Depot, Isfahan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Reza Amper (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Heritage and residence by city or region edit
Please review:
- Wikipedia talk:Category names#Heritage and residence by city or region
- Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people#Parents, grandparents, relatives
I've used some wording that you propoeed in CfD. Sometimes it helps to have a concrete proposal for discussion. It probably doesn't go as far as you've proposed, so please suggest any additions as needed.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 10:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Mendota Station, California for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mendota Station, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Bagh-e Hajji Abdol for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagh-e Hajji Abdol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ANI notice edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Llywelyn2000 personal attacks during CfD. Thank you. Surprised you weren't already notified since the thread concerned attacks on you. Nil Einne (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion edit
"Josef Vinatzer" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Josef Vinatzer. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 28#Josef Vinatzer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. KnightMove (talk) 05:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)