Bothnia
|
== Erik Laxman & admins ==
I do sincerely apologize for my rude knee-jerk response. I do most of my work on the Japanese-related articles, and the debates about whether to call things by their Japanese names or Korean names or Anglicized butchering of either just really get to me, and as much as I try not to let it bother me, I do find it annoying that we spend so much time arguing over details like that when we could be discussing and perhaps even advancing scholarship. That said, I hope you do not think poorly upon me as a person, nor as an editor. Please remember, we admins here on Wikipedia are not assigned by some higher power to be able to always know the best way to resolve a situation - we're only human, and more or less regular anonymous random editors like yourself. I do my best to help out where I can, and I like to be able to help others; sometimes I just lose track of what I should be doing and how I should be helping. Uther's just being stubborn and obnoxious, like too many editors are. Please don't begrudge all admins for it. And if you ever come across something I can help with - a question on Japanese history or culture - I'd be happy to help you out with it. I'm not the most experienced nor talented at solving disputes, but I'm working on it. LordAmeth 14:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Pictures edit
So, I finally got around to processing and uploading those pictures to the commons, as seen here. The first picture, on the left, is a standard picture from the front. I had to shoot it a little diagonally in order to keep a traffic sign out of the frame, but I think it is basically encyclopedic.
The second picture is shot diagonally, from the side, as seen on the right. I think that it is more aesthetically pleasing, but my widest camera lens wasn't wide enough to get it all from where I was able to shoot, so it might not be sufficiently encyclopedic to use. Enjoy!Ferox Seneca (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Bothnia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)