Non-free rationale for File:Aspeace4-credit-GinaBinkley 20130211 140048.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aspeace4-credit-GinaBinkley 20130211 140048.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Hur (2016 film) (January 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hz.tiang was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. heyzec! 09:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Billca42, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! heyzec! 09:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Silva Method edit

Sorry about issuing those warnings, I see now you were acting in good-faith. However, don't blank all the content and leave just a stub message (which by the way you should use {{stub}} rather than writing it out). There is an entire article here so we don't want to remove it. Alternatively if we want to redirect that's fine, but a page that only says it is a stub and contains no other content is not appropriate. Thanks! MusikAnimal talk 17:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply