Notability of Jay Thomas (rugby league) edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jay Thomas (rugby league), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jay Thomas (rugby league) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jay Thomas (rugby league), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of John Ioane edit

 

A tag has been placed on John Ioane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Buxbaum666 (talk) 13:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

The article John Ioane has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dlohcierekim 13:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Biglez! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim 13:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

February 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Australian Football League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Florrieleave a note 16:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mount Druitt, New South Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 12:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

The recent edit you made to Mount Schank constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 12:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC))Reply


 

A tag has been placed on Thomas Mischewski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Florrieleave a note 14:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

A tag has been placed on Jessa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Florrieleave a note 14:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Prod edit

Jay Thomas (rugby league) edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jay Thomas (rugby league), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Jay Thomas (rugby league). Dweller (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Danny Mcdermott edit

 

A tag has been placed on Danny Mcdermott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JASpencer (talk) 11:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Jeremy Kosbob edit

I have nominated Jeremy Kosbob, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Kosbob. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. JASpencer (talk) 11:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Jay Thomas (rugby league) edit

I have nominated Jay Thomas (rugby league), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Thomas (rugby league). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. JASpencer (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Transwiki to a more suitable site edit

 

Hi Biglez, As some of your articles are currently under review for deletion, you may wish to consider transferring them to Wikipopuli, a wiki that hosts biographical articles and does not impose a notability requirement. Best, TheYellowCabin (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Keith Lulia edit

 

A tag has been placed on Keith Lulia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q T C 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ben White edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ben White, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ben White. JASpencer (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ben White edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ben White requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Collectonian (talk) 23:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of David Gray (rugby league) edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Gray (rugby league), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  10:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Eddie Harrison edit

 

A tag has been placed on Eddie Harrison requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  florrie  02:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Brendan Waller edit

 

A tag has been placed on Brendan Waller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  florrie  05:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of NG Bulls edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NG Bulls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no refs, not notable, likely to never increase above stub level

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattlore (talk) 10:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leandro Boccaccio edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leandro Boccaccio, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no refs, not notable, likely to never increase above stub level

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattlore (talk) 10:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Frank Samia edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frank Samia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, no sources from google, has played 1 game for lebbanon national rugby league team ([2]) but I fear there will be no sources added to expand, never played in top-grade rugby league competition despite seemingly played for St George. Current squad template still exists despite no longer on the template. Suggest deletion

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  08:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ben White edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ben White, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unreferenced, nothing really from google, no context provided, some first-party sources, I fear no expansion possible, violates WP:RL guidelines Rule 9.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  The Windler talk  08:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Frank Samia edit

I have nominated Frank Samia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Samia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  The Windler talk  06:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ben White edit

I have nominated Ben White, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben White. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  The Windler talk  06:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Biglez! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 17 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Leo Berngruber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jin Iguchi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Hiroshi Miyazaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Mitsutaka Inuoe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Narihisa Ushida - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Masamichi Itagaki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Kazunori Ijuin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Shunsuke Tamura - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Ryo Kondo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Norihiro Oriyama - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alfredo Siucatti edit

 

The article Alfredo Siucatti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:50, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cristhian Armendariz edit

 

The article Cristhian Armendariz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Federico Astoreca edit

 

The article Federico Astoreca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Walter Friedrichs edit

 

The article Walter Friedrichs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Facundo Rico edit

 

The article Facundo Rico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alejandro Bibulich edit

 

The article Alejandro Bibulich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nahuel Costabile edit

 

The article Nahuel Costabile has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leonardo Frangí edit

 

The article Leonardo Frangí has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Javier Piedrahit edit

 

The article Javier Piedrahit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mariano Boccaccio edit

 

The article Mariano Boccaccio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adrián Zanola edit

 

The article Adrián Zanola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Stella edit

 

The article Gabriel Stella has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marco Cejas edit

 

The article Marco Cejas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of José Villafane edit

 

The article José Villafane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leonardo Fernandez edit

 

The article Leonardo Fernandez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Federico Alfonso edit

 

The article Federico Alfonso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adrian Pla edit

 

The article Adrian Pla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No ghits worth mentioning. At most, amateur player even if he exists, would seem to fail WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 19:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kazunobu Nakai edit

 

The article Kazunobu Nakai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

questionable notability, no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Norihiro Oriyama edit

 

The article Norihiro Oriyama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

questionable notability, no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shunsuke Tamura edit

 

The article Shunsuke Tamura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Narihisa Ushida edit

 

The article Narihisa Ushida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Benedict Pender edit

 

The article Benedict Pender has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hiroshi Miyazaki edit

 

The article Hiroshi Miyazaki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ryo Kondo edit

 

The article Ryo Kondo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hirofumi Kita edit

 

The article Hirofumi Kita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Masanori Kazaoka edit

 

The article Masanori Kazaoka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Masamichi Itagaki edit

 

The article Masamichi Itagaki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mitsutaka Inuoe edit

 

The article Mitsutaka Inuoe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kazunori Ijuin edit

 

The article Kazunori Ijuin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jin Iguchi edit

 

The article Jin Iguchi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mitsuo Takashino edit

 

The article Mitsuo Takashino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leo Berngruber edit

 

The article Leo Berngruber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ali Re edit

 

The article Ali Re has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luis Tambussi edit

 

The article Luis Tambussi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, lacking notability per WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

==Proposed deletion of Danny Kaye (rugby league)==
 

The article Danny Kaye (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This individual does not meet general notability requirements for inclusion, nor the more specific criteria at WP:NSPORTS in that he has not played in a fully professional league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 17:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gareth Baxendale edit

 

The article Gareth Baxendale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable Rugby league player - Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSPORT#Rugby league, Rugby league in North America is not a professional sport and as such this player does not appear to have received significant coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Billy Ezzo edit

 

The article Billy Ezzo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable Rugby league player - Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSPORT#Rugby league, Rugby league in North America is not a professional sport and as such this player does not appear to have received significant coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Forde edit

 

The article Jonathan Forde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable Rugby league player - Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSPORT#Rugby league, Rugby league in North America is not a professional sport and as such this player does not appear to have received significant coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tom Scheinzbach edit

 

The article Tom Scheinzbach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable Rugby league player - Fails WP:GNG & WP:NSPORT#Rugby league, Rugby league in North America is not a professional sport and as such this player does not appear to have received significant coverage to meet WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jeremy Kosbob for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jeremy Kosbob, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Kosbob until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 14:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jay Thomas (rugby league) for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Jay Thomas (rugby league), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Thomas (rugby league) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ryan Mulligan edit

 

The article Ryan Mulligan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

North American Rugby league player who fails WP:NSPORTS#Rugby league, in so far as Rugby league is a minor amateur sport in North America and playing for ones national side is no indication of any form of notability or passing WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Franco Vermeulen edit

 

The article Franco Vermeulen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of playing in any international matches against other full IRLF members - so fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shane O'Driscoll edit

 

The article Shane O'Driscoll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:RLN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 06:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ronald Anthony O'Gorman edit

 

The article Ronald Anthony O'Gorman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails RLN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jason Best edit

 

The article Jason Best has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:RLN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Tufua" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tufua and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 23 § Tufua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 00:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Makatusi" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Makatusi and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 23 § Makatusi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 00:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Tom van Vollenhoven Cup" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tom van Vollenhoven Cup and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Tom van Vollenhoven Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply