talk archive

Hello, Belchfire! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BelovedFreak 10:52, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Some of your recent edits edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed a few of your recent edits and, as a new editor, I would advise taking some time to read some of our policies and guidelines. Don't worry, no one expects you to know them all. A few things though: please don't remove material that is cited to a reliable source, with an edit summary like "Removed obviously untrue statement regarding Starbuck's." If you have a reliable source that says differently, feel free to add that. if you just disbelieve what the source says, please start a discussion on the article talkpage. Please don't make a large number of non-trivial changes to an article and mark the edit as "minor". This is misleading to other editors, particularly when the edit summary doesn't begin to describe the changes you've made. That edit introduced a number of errors into the article, including overlinking of common terms, changing links to specific articles to point at disambiguation pages and removing legitimate interwiki links to articles in other languages. For that reason, I have reverted the edit. I'm not familiar with the subject and don't doubt that you've made some good changes. I suggest you make smaller changes, with descriptive edit summaries, so that people can see what you're changing and why.

Lastly, please don't change gender-related pronouns or descriptions without discussion. Transgender issues are complicated anyway and can cause conflict on WIkipedia when editors try to decide the best way to describe people. It is not something that is done lightly. Our manual of style says "Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to using the gendered nouns, pronouns, and possessive adjectives that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification." In any case, describing male to female transexuals as "trans men" does not "clarify" anything, since the term "trans men" is used to describe people who are born women and have sex changes to become men. This is the opposite situation of that described in the article in question. If you think an article can be improved, feel free to start a discussion at the relevant talkpage, but coming along once a year to unilaterally make major changes without discussion is not helpful. --BelovedFreak 11:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2012 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Brett Kimberlin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Here is another source for the Kimberlin article:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hAH9djcmqKs

Mattsky (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removed PROD edit

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Neil Munro (journalist), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Tacoma Streetcar Disaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Athleek123 04:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reversion edit

Regarding this edit of yours, I must point out that there's nothing defamatory about a sentence in the lead that complies with WP:LEAD by summarizing content in the body of the article. That's why it's there. Looking at the article as a whole, it seemed to be kind of a key point, which is why I originally restored it after an anon removed it without explanation. I have restored it again. If you disagree, please discuss on the talk page. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Do I really have to explain why that comment is defamatory towards conservatives? Seriously? At a bare minimum, that statement should be qualified by saying "some conservatives" or "some conservative-leaning groups", but to make a blanket statement and leave it bare is simply inaccurate, I don't care what your reference says. Belchfire (talk) 04:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, you do. Qualify the statement if you like, but to blank out a sourced statement in the lead that summarizes the body, as the lead is supposed to do, requires justification. If you have a problem with the body of the article, then argue to change it, but per WP:LEAD, the lead should provide an overview of the body regardless of your or my opinion on whether the body content should be there. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I did justify my edit, I suspect you just don't like my reason. I suggest taking it to the Talk page, and let some other editors weigh-in. That's how WP:BRD is supposed to work. Belchfire (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
You are still edit-warring there. If you want to change the meaning of a long-standing consensus version, particularly a non-controversial summary overview of the body of the article, supported by reliable sources, based on a personal perception that the long-standing version somehow maligns a particular group, the burden is on you to explain yourself on the talk page. Please do so. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Longstanding??? I reverted verbiage added on July 1 (500165823). It's hate speech and it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Belchfire (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just saw your last edit. Good call. Fair and accurate.
Thanks. We'll see how long that lasts!
Regarding my claim of long-standing: I looked further back in the history and see the phrase "some conservatives" has been there for several months (I went back to November), only recently being reverted and restored, about the time you came in. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Funny, Belchfire, how was it "added on July 1" if you reverted it on June 29? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Check again. Look at version 500165823 and see the change made by Fayedizard on July 1, to the first sentence in the first paragraph. The reversion I made on June 29 involved the last sentence in the first paragraph. If Fayedizard's edit had been there on June 29, we could have fixed it all at the same time. As I already pointed out, Amatulic's most recent edit is fair and accurate, and avoids painting all conservatives with an overly-broad brush, so I'm happy now. Honestly, people are too quick to just revert without discussing, and that includes EVERYBODY in this dust-up, myself included. Belchfire (talk) 21:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Continuing here, since I started it. :)

Regarding that long parenthetical note you removed from the lead of homosexual agenda: I agree it messed up the lead, but I also agree with the person who reverted you that it is useful for the article to explain it... somewhere. I hope my solution is acceptable. I created a new reference group for notes as opposed to actual references, and anything that could be considered an explanatory note, I put in there. That includes the part you deleted, as well as other references that contained lengthy quotations. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. If the lead is more readable, I am satisfied. The material in parenthesis should have been in the body of the article anyway. (Otherwise, it didn't belong in the lead, right?) Belchfire (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring warning edit

 

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Homosexual agenda. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

"tax penalty" edit

A tax penalty is a penalty for messing up on your taxes. The mandate is something else. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not according to SCOTUS. Belchfire (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
"we must accept the Government’s interpretation: §6201(a) instructs the Secretary that his authority to assess taxes includes the authority to assess penalties, but it does not equate assessable penalties to taxes for other purposes."--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have no doubt that you can find all manner of sophistry to support your POV. There isn't any real need to prove that. A tax is a tax is a tax. Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc. Calling it a "fee" doesn't mean it isn't a tax, it just means the politicians who put it in place don't want to be honest about it. Reality remains unaltered. As to the article, I offered my reasoning for my edit, and unsurprisingly I was overruled by the liberal whitewash squad. Such is life at Wikipedia. Belchfire (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MastCell Talk 05:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bold for polling edit

Regarding this edit, putting the leading position in bold is standard for polling for elections in the US and elsewhere. See polls listed at United States Senate election in Arizona, 2012 (three sections); United States Senate election in Nevada, 2012; Illinois gubernatorial election, 2010 (three sections); 40th British Columbia general election; Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election; Greek legislative election, June 2012. -Rrius (talk) 06:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

No prob. -Rrius (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP Conservatism edit

I see you have an interest in conservatism-related articles. You might be interested in the most exciting, fasted growing group of editors in the entire Wikipedia:

  Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism.
Simply click here to accept! – Lionel (talk) 06:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Come by and introduce yourself--we don't bite, lol! – Lionel (talk) 06:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dead refs edit

We assume good faith that at the time the ref was added it worked. It is better to tag dead refs with {{dead link}}. – Lionel (talk) 03:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

That's a good tip, thanks. Belchfire (talk) 03:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Btw it's unwise to revert multiple editors--even if it appears they are incorrect. You'll just get blocked and they'll change the article while you're on "vacation." This is exactly what Scientiom did to Lsufalcon at HA. Just wait for other interested editors--i.e. me--to show up. – Lionel (talk) 03:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
To expand, dead links are not violations of WP:V, as discussed at WP:DEADLINK: Do not delete factual information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online. Except for URLs in the External links section that have not been used to support any article content, do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer. Recovery and repair options and tools are available. Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 03:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
In case noone mentioned it--blocks are escalating. The next one after 48 is a week. – Lionel (talk) 03:46, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
LOL, well if you scroll up, you can see I've learned the hard way that 2 is the limit and as often as not, 2 times is enough. Thanks again for sharing, there's definitely lots to learn about this place. Belchfire (talk) 03:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply


You have been mentioned by name edit

hereLionel (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good grief, as if canvassing was really necessary - there are already multiple tag teams operating. Belchfire (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Belchfire. You have new messages at Talk:Homosexuals Anonymous.
Message added 03:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re your request for better sources, [1]. Regards! VQuakr (talk) 03:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Washington United for Marriage
Nebraska Initiative Measure 416 (2000)
Aberdeen City (band)
Recognition of same-sex unions in Minnesota
A Place So Foreign and Eight More
Downtown, Tacoma, Washington
Marshall High School (Marshall, Minnesota)
Carthage Foundation
Song Zhe
Iliotibial tract
Washington Families Standing Together
Premier of Montserrat
With a Little Help
Makers (Cory Doctorow novel)
Hawaii Constitutional Amendment 2 (1998)
I, Robot (Cory Doctorow)
Sparkline
Pukaki River
The Complete Idiot's Guide to Publishing Science Fiction
Cleanup
Scaife Foundations
Al-Shabaab
Lawrence v. Texas
Merge
Homosexuality in society
List of Major League Baseball record holders
Heart rate
Add Sources
Timeline of LGBT history
Status of same-sex marriage
Capital punishment in the United States
Wikify
Visio.M
Federal Digital System
Places that have decriminalized non-medical cannabis in the United States
Expand
Postcodes in the United Kingdom
Human rights in the United States
Same-sex relationship

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

(message from new editor) edit

I couldn't figure out how to send you a message back. Thanks for the note. I added something and left an edit note. Just to follow up; legally guilty does not mean mandatory conviction. You still have a right to plead not guilty in court. I know because I was arrested 5 years ago for DUI with blood alcohol significantly over .08 and I plead not guilty and was convicted of "Reckless Driving" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.13.221 (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

General sanctions edit

Hi, I noticed your recent comments on Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change. I'd like to draw your attention, in case you're new to the topic, to the fact that the entire field of climate change on Wikipedia is under general sanctions imposed by the Arbitration Committee. Please don't use the talk pages, edit summaries or article space for inappropriate comments, in particular attacks on other people or "us and them" style discussions. Stick to the content and discussion of how best to represent the topic, please. Take up interpersonal issues on user talk pages, and so on. If there is a glaring instance of inappropriate behaviour, please take it immediately to WP:AE. --TS 21:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this note. Much appreciated. Belchfire (talk) 21:40, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Handy links edit

Watcher Counts
Traffic Stats
Book Sources Wiki Blame

Re: Global warming controversy edit

Ironically, WP:LEAD and WP:MOSINTRO say the opposite of what you claim. Viriditas (talk) 06:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Negative.

"The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article."

And also:

"The first paragraph should define the topic with a neutral point of view, but without being overly specific."

Thus, the first sentence of the article should be:

"The global warming controversy includes a variety of disputes about the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming. "

Followed by the things that logically flow from there. It's pretty self-evident, really, unless you're trying to push a certain POV. Belchfire (talk) 06:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Wrong. "If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the opening sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it." And, "The first paragraph should define the topic with a neutral point of view, but without being overly specific. It should establish the context in which the topic is being considered by supplying the set of circumstances or facts that surround it." In other words, "there is a strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view, though a few organizations hold non-committal positions." That's NPOV. Viriditas (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Political activities of the Koch family edit

Rm unsourced. Not supported by citations provided

The statement is fully supported by both The New York Times[2] and Forbes.[3] If you persist in making false claims in the edit summary and reverting based on these false claims, you will be reported. Viriditas (talk) 06:36, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to start a discussion and let other editors weigh-in. The sources say $50,000 per plate OR $75,000 per couple. Nobody paid $50K unless they went stag. Yes, that's nit-picky, but this is an encyclopedia.
More to the point, why is it even necessary to mention the per-plate cost of attendance? It was a fundraiser, that's all that matters. Everybody knows it wasn't a church spaghetti feed. Belchfire (talk) 06:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
You're backpedaling so fast, it looks like you're doing the moonwalk. How do you know that nobody paid 50K? Were you at the dinner? Do you work for Romney or Koch? Would you like to disclose a potential conflict of interest? The sources are clear. Forbes reports that "Romney supporters paid $50,000 a plate (or $75,000 per couple) to mingle with Koch", and The New York Times confirms it. What exactly is it that I need to discuss and let other editors weigh-in about? Viriditas (talk) 06:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Read slower, don't skim. I said nobody paid $50K unless they went stag. I'm not backpedaling, I just explained to you why your point is shaky and why it doesn't necessarily belong in the article even if it is 100% true (it's not). Again, go start a discussion and see what other editors think. It's not like the decision lies with just the two of us. Belchfire (talk) 06:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Correct, I've already weighed in, supporting Viriditas, so what we have here is a well-supported consensus against you. Now, if you have citations to prove that _nobody_ went stag, you're free to include them and we'll change it to just "$75k per couple". 24.45.42.125 (talk) 07:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
One more time... start a discussion and let other editors give their opinions. And while you are waiting for that to unfold, spend a little time learning Wikipedia policies. It will improve your experience. Belchfire (talk) 07:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

{{talk archive]]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Tom Cotter (comedian)
Eddie O'Donnell
Federation of Architects, Engineers, Chemists, and Technicians
Miankuh District
Michael Paulson
Great Indonesia Movement Party
Eddie Pullen
Prospect Hill, Tacoma, Washington
Charlotte Street, Brisbane
Jim Carlson (businessman)
Nejime, Kagoshima
Joe Senser
Truth Wins Out
Joe Boyer
Cliff Durant
Stadium District, Tacoma, Washington
Albert Street, Brisbane
Turnaround: Crisis, Leadership, and the Olympic Games
Roscoe Sarles
Cleanup
Climate change scenario
Sam Brownback
Thomas & Friends
Merge
Gender pay gap
New town
Mass (Catholic Church)
Add Sources
Barack Obama social policy
Conservatism in the United States
Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States
Wikify
Stanley Foundation
Money creation
City of Oakland Energy and Climate Action Plan
Expand
Democratic Party (United States)
Public image of Mitt Romney
Alliance Defense Fund

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Lough Derg (Ulster)
Conservatism in Germany
Hohle Fels
Baltika Group
Doune
Political international
Jaime Balmes
Doune railway station
Modern Age (periodical)
Women in conservatism in the United States
Constitution Party of Idaho
Intimate examination
Richard Machowicz
Shawn Atleo
Solidara
Arnold Gehlen
Humanitas (journal)
Al-masry Al-youm
Secular Right
Cleanup
Economic policy of Barack Obama
Conservatism in Canada
Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008
Merge
Libertarian conservatism
Barack Obama foreign policy
Rockford Institute
Add Sources
The Jim Henson Company
Louis Gabriel Ambroise de Bonald
Morality in Media
Wikify
Social Party of National Unity
Freedom of religion in Yemen
FAO ADAM
Expand
Liberal conservatism
Catholic Church and politics in the United States
Centrism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Jeff Boss
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
Tupac Katari Guerrilla Army
Political positions of Ralph Nader
Roger Arnebergh
Equestrian at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Individual dressage
War as metaphor
Quarentinha
Agenzia Fides
Small-c conservative
Freedom of religion in Sri Lanka
Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
Pia de Solenni
Jim Butterfield (American football)
Howdy Wilcox
Alternative press (U.S. political right)
Republican Party of New Mexico
Same-sex marriage in the Republic of China
Brio (magazine)
Cleanup
Chicago
Political positions of Sarah Palin
Opposition research
Merge
Family planning in the United States
Phyllis Schlafly
Mass (liturgy)
Add Sources
Cathedral Catholic High School
Democrat In Name Only
Freedom of religion in the United States
Wikify
List of political parties in France
Freedom of religion in Vietnam
Freedom of religion in Thailand
Expand
National Right to Life Committee
Henri Massis
LGBT rights opposition

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Vermont Democratic Party
Austin Straubel
Focus on the Family Canada
Napoleon Whiting
Missouri Republican Party
Organic unity
Ben Smith (journalist)
Helene Cooper
Carlos Henriquez
Mark Landler
Dan T. Cathy
Indiana Republican Party
Fifty-state strategy
James Robins
Justice Party (Kosovo)
Matthew Continetti
Kate Zernike
United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 1962
Kush (cannabis)
Cleanup
McGee and Me!
Social exclusion
Domestic policy of the George W. Bush administration
Merge
List of Soviet and Eastern Bloc defectors
Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008
Decriminalization of non-medical cannabis in the United States
Add Sources
Ricky Sekhon
United States presidential nominating convention
Nicolás Gómez Dávila
Wikify
Mission: America
Freedom of religion in Azerbaijan
Pregnant patients' rights
Expand
United States Senate election in Illinois, 2010
Michael Oakeshott
Bob Barr

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Washington United for Marriage
Acxsys
Female Stranger
Racism in the LGBT community
Cool Guys Don't Look at Explosions
Uniontown Speedway
Gus Sorola
Louis P. Sheldon
Jim Clymer
Robby Wells
The History of Joseph Smith by His Mother
German People's Party
Isagenix International
John F. Keenan (State Senator)
Edward DeMarco
William Hauser
Rhode Island Democratic Party
California Republican Assembly
Washington Families Standing Together
Cleanup
US domestic reactions to the 2011 military intervention in Libya
Dearborn, Michigan
Fernando Espuelas
Merge
Innocence of Muslims
ChristianUnion
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
Add Sources
François Quesnay
New Right
Priest
Wikify
Places that have decriminalized non-medical cannabis in the United States
Patricia Sullivan (tea party)
Religion in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Expand
Libertarian Party (United States)
European Democrats
Charlie Crist

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Erin Burnett OutFront
Turnaround: Crisis, Leadership, and the Olympic Games
Guttmacher Institute
State of Louisiana v. Frisard
The Form of the Sword
Bruce Frohnen
Tacoma Public Library
Jim Carlson (businessman)
Justice Party (United States)
Pandering (politics)
Warren Mosler
Richard E. Cohen
Mist
Unlocking the Mystery of Life
Nebraska Party
Conservative Party of Armenia
Illinois Democratic primary, 2008
Christian republic
Ronna Romney
Cleanup
Chalcedon Foundation
Grande Noirceur
Texas A&M University–Kingsville
Merge
Homosexuality in society
History of religion in the United States
Koch family
Add Sources
Factions in the Republican Party (United States)
George Berkeley Ross
Timeline of LGBT history
Wikify
Human rights in Austria
Daniel Fessler
Importance of religion by country
Expand
Charles Maurras
No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act
Sphere

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Secular Right
Political international
Liolaemus nitidus
Constitution Party of Idaho
Jefferson Republican Party
Conservative Party (Egypt)
Conservatism in Germany
Tony Fratto
Modern Age (periodical)
Women in conservatism in the United States
Mike Murphy (political consultant)
San Francisco Cannabis Buyers Club
Jaime Balmes
Anthony D. Perkins
Havilah
Arnold Gehlen
Intimate examination
Richard M. Schulze
National conservatism
Cleanup
Sam Brownback
Conservatism in Canada
Bobby Jindal
Merge
Libertarian conservatism
Rockford Institute
John Kerry presidential campaign, 2004
Add Sources
Employer Identification Number
Republican Party (United States)
Liberal conservatism
Wikify
John Juzek
Lejwana, Botswana
List of Redakai: Conquer the Kairu episodes
Expand
Little Caesars
J. Patrick Lewis
Centrism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Republican Party of New Mexico
Brio (magazine)
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children
Political positions of Ralph Nader
Malone Stadium
The Ivory Ape
Pia de Solenni
National Party (Ireland, 1995)
Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
Alternative press (U.S. political right)
Freedom of religion in Sri Lanka
Alaska Republican caucuses, 2008
Small-c conservative
William D. Johnson (CEO)
Tom Smith (Pennsylvania politician)
War as metaphor
Virginia's 10th congressional district
Everybody Talks
Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton
Cleanup
Freedom of religion in Vietnam
Adult lifetime cannabis use by country
Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008
Merge
Phyllis Schlafly
Sanctity of life
Binders full of women
Add Sources
Louis Gabriel Ambroise de Bonald
Othmar Spann
Kellyanne Conway
Wikify
Henri Massis
Sarah Jane Brain Foundation State Lead Centers of Excellence
Haus der Bayerischen Geschichte
Expand
Juan Manuel de Rosas
LGBT rights opposition
National Right to Life Committee

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
United States Senate special election in Massachusetts, 1962
Matthew Continetti
Georgia's 9th congressional district special election, 2010
Dupa
Kush (cannabis)
Yahoo! News
Qualcomm Hexagon
Dan T. Cathy
Revised Code of Washington
Freedom of religion in South Africa
Missouri Republican Party
Federal Democratic Union of Switzerland
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
Justice Party (Kosovo)
Kate Zernike
Ben Smith (journalist)
Lorenzo Maitani
Organic unity
Fifty-state strategy
Cleanup
McGee and Me!
Oculus Rift
Alexander S. Onassis Foundation
Merge
United States presidential election debates, 2012
Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008
Barack Obama foreign policy
Add Sources
Nicolás Gómez Dávila
United States presidential nominating convention
Catholic Church and Nazi Germany
Wikify
Pregnant patients' rights
Pool and its Role in Asian Communism
UMW Rowing
Expand
Michael Oakeshott
Libertarianism in the United States
Lemon socialism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Robby Wells
Homosexuality and Citizenship in Florida
Theodoor Hendrik van de Velde
East coast liberal
1928 Democratic National Convention
Straight-ticket voting
Minnesota elections, 2008
Elizabeth Salguero
1984 Democratic National Convention
Narrandera Shire
1944 Republican National Convention
New York Republican primary, 2008
Alson Streeter
Louis P. Sheldon
A. Albert Yuzpe
Convention bounce
American Samoa Republican caucuses, 2012
United States Senate election in Massachusetts, 1996
Family court
Cleanup
Disability hate crime
Opposition research
Scaife Foundations
Merge
State religion
United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia, 2010
ChristianUnion
Add Sources
Misattributed paternity
JellyTelly
Jane E. Norton
Wikify
Patricia Sullivan (tea party)
Richard Machowicz
Tsonko Tsonev
Expand
United States Senate election in Illinois, 2010
Pregnancy discrimination
Libertarian Party (United States)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Guttmacher Institute
Susan J. Ferguson
Unlocking the Mystery of Life
Carthage Foundation
Christian Observer
Tom Hoefling
Ngawang Yeshey Gyatso
Zaitokukai
Warren Mosler
Homeless dumping
Sarah Scaife Foundation
No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act
Age segregation
Jim Carlson (businessman)
Christian republic
Priorities USA Action
Turnaround: Crisis, Leadership, and the Olympic Games
Jeff Riggenbach
Hammer & Tongs
Cleanup
Places that have decriminalized non-medical cannabis in the United States
Grande Noirceur
Biology and political orientation
Merge
Genism
Weightism
Homosexuality in society
Add Sources
Josef Harpe
Factions in the Republican Party (United States)
John M. Olin Foundation
Wikify
Vashon Odd Fellows Hall
Arkansas Business Publishing Group
Philibert Jean-Baptiste Curial
Expand
Tea Party movement
Abrasive blasting
Bob Barr

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Truth Wins Out
Hawkins' Treatise of Pleas of the Crown
Michael Kimmel
Women in conservatism in the United States
Marriage Under Fire
Huixtocihuatl
Scrolls of Abraham (Islam)
LGBT rights in the Republic of the Congo
József Molnár (painter)
Secular Right
Timeline of sexual orientation and medicine
Domestic violence in Bolivia
Income distribution
Last prophet
Constitution Party of Idaho
LGBT rights in Kazakhstan
LGBT rights in Eritrea
Reproductive coercion
Political international
Cleanup
Roman Catholic theology
List of political ideologies
Conservatism in Canada
Merge
Gender pay gap
History of religion in the United States
Rob Portman
Add Sources
Black conservatism in the United States
Republican Party (United States)
Timeline of LGBT history
Wikify
Pelham Memorial High School
Rapid transit in Thailand
University Institute of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Panjab University
Expand
Homosexuality and psychology
New Right
Cannabis in California

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Republican Party of New Mexico
Keziah
Heterosexual–homosexual continuum
War as metaphor
Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
LGBT rights in Suriname
Accommodation (law)
Reproductive life plan
Buzi
Peddling Prosperity
Political positions of Ralph Nader
James Barr (biblical scholar)
Brio (magazine)
Azariah (prophet)
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Ahijah the Shilonite
Voidable marriage
Oded
Journal of International Economics
Cleanup
Christianity and violence
Catholic Church in the 20th century
Vulvovaginal health
Merge
Catholic sex abuse cases
Prophets and messengers in Islam
Eucharistic theology
Add Sources
Comcast
Brian Doherty (journalist)
Sexualism
Wikify
Reproductive system disease
LGBT rights in the United Kingdom
LGBT slogans
Expand
Limpieza de sangre
LGBT rights opposition
National Right to Life Committee

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Germantown (Quincy, Massachusetts)
Heterosexual–homosexual continuum
Ahijah the Shilonite
Republican Party of New Mexico
LGBT rights in Suriname
Bruno Forte
How Would a Patriot Act?
War as metaphor
University College Hospital Galway
Anonymous-OS
Straight Plan for the Gay Man
Good and necessary consequence
Political positions of Ralph Nader
Alaska Republican caucuses, 2008
Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
Great Compression
LGBT rights in Montenegro
Reproductive life plan
Peddling Prosperity
Cleanup
Vulvovaginal health
Peterson Toscano
Lot in Islam
Merge
Prophets and messengers in Islam
Occupy Wall Street
Apostle (Islam)
Add Sources
Criticism of religion
Bartolo Longo
Ellen Organ
Wikify
Reproductive system disease
Rick Santorum
LGBT rights in the United Kingdom
Expand
LGBT rights opposition
History of Christian theology
Bush tax cuts

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Enterobacter
Heterosexual–homosexual continuum
Political positions of Ralph Nader
Great Compression
Missouri gubernatorial election, 2012
LGBT rights in Montenegro
Peddling Prosperity
Ahijah the Shilonite
Alien Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
How Would a Patriot Act?
Peter Gandy (author)
Azariah (prophet)
War as metaphor
LGBT rights in Suriname
Shemaiah (prophet)
Straight Plan for the Gay Man
UGM-96 Trident I
Buzi
Brio (magazine)
Cleanup
Jeet Kune Do
2002 Los Angeles Airport shooting
Tapir
Merge
Occupy Wall Street
COINTELPRO
End time
Add Sources
Joe Flacco
Sexual orientation
Intersex
Wikify
Rick Santorum
Stigma management
LGBT rights in the United Kingdom
Expand
Bush tax cuts
Eni
History of Christian theology

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)Reply