Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, welcome, and I hope that you will like Wikipedia. Tom Harrison Talk 00:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just a heads up…

edit

Since obviously an edit war will get us nowhere, I'll have a discussion on the subject of listing Avatars up on the Avatar Wiki Project's Talk Page in a few minutes, and I'd appreciate your input so we can reach an agreeable compromise.--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 23:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK, got it up, its located here. (Sorry it took so long, I'm something of a slow typist.)--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 23:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Flopsie

edit

Thank you for your interest in helping keep Avatar information as correct. However, your changes to the species of the Character "Flopsie" has been changed due to a dispute currently going on in the talk page for Avatar Creatures. Feel free to bring in your input there. Thanks. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 05:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Legendary Pokémon

edit

Please join the ongoing discussion at Talk:Legendary Pokémon instead of simply reverting. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to New Flamenco

edit

Your recent edit to New Flamenco (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

February 2007

edit
 

The recent edit you made to Aang constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 20:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Aang. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing – Qxz 20:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures

edit
 

An editor has nominated List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Spirit World (Avatar: The Last Airbender)

edit
 

I have nominated Spirit World (Avatar: The Last Airbender), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit World (Avatar: The Last Airbender). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Parent5446 (t n e l) 02:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!