This user has publicly declared that he has a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:
This user is identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. (verify)
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user is a MediaWiki developer with merge access to MediaWiki Core (verify).
This user has been on Wikipedia for 17 years, 6 months and 3 days.
This user is not a Wikipedia administrator but would like to be one someday.
This editor won the Million Award for bringing Google to Good Article status.
This user believes that userboxes do not divide the Wikipedia community, but rather emphasise its diversity.
♂This user is male.
This user lives in, or hails from,
New York City.
27This user is 27 years old.
@_@ This user is a Weaboo.
vn-2This user page has been vandalized twice.
This user believes in the separation of church and state.
I support on/off buttons for opt-in ads on a nonprofit Wikipedia for all readers (via cookies).
This user loves Wikipe-tan, the cutest personification of Wikipedia.


This user is a member of the

Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.