Welcome to Wikipedia! edit

Hello Az haris! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- —Centrxtalk • 21:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

License tagging for Image:Fa2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fa2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion candidate warning edit

A tag has been placed on Atta ur Rahman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tgies 07:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
  1. Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
  2. Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Kinu t/c 07:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ehsan Rasheed edit

Hello, concerning your contribution, Ehsan Rasheed, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aerc.edu.pk/ahsan_r.htm. As a copyright violation, Ehsan Rasheed appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ehsan Rasheed has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Ehsan Rasheed. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Ehsan Rasheed, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope 18:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Final warning edit

 

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. -- Merope 18:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for persistently posting copyrighted material. -- Merope 18:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

1 month block for posting more copyright material edit

The following is a list of the material that violated copyright and has been removed:

Because you persist in posting copyrighted material I have blocked you and Az84haris for 1 month. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Dmg.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Dmg.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Khalida Ghous edit

I've nominated Khalida Ghous, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Khalida Ghous satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalida Ghous and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Khalida Ghous during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jefferson Anderson 20:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Karachi faculty edit

These articles -- worthy as the subjects may be -- need to be rewritten in the normal WP style. I have just done the one on Talat A. Wizrat as a model. DGG 03:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Kaiser Bengali edit

An editor has nominated Kaiser Bengali, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaiser Bengali and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pakistan Day edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pakistan Day, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wiki.cn/wiki/Republic_Day. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 07:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Syed Waqar Ahmed Rizvi edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Syed Waqar Ahmed Rizvi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Syed Waqar Ahmed Rizvi. Jfire (talk) 19:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Farogh Naseem edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Farogh Naseem, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dawn.com/2008/01/08/local10.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal of AFSD template edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Farogh Naseem. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.--Ubardak (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pakistan Academy of Letters edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pakistan Academy of Letters, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.pakpost.gov.pk/philately/stamps2003/pakistan_academy_of_letters.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Iftikhar Arif has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prodego talk 15:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copy and Paste edit

Please do not copy and paste content inbetween Wikipedia … have a look at WP:COPY and WP:MOVE. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reposted Material edit

Please do not repost deleted material such as Javed Jabbar. Ogranut (talk) 07:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Shahid Hasan Siddiqui edit

 

A tag has been placed on Shahid Hasan Siddiqui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ╟─Treasury§Tagcontribs─╢ 15:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Copyright violation in Shahid Hasan Siddiqui edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article Shahid Hasan Siddiqui, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Abd-ul-Wahab edit

Proposed deletion of Abd-ul-Wahab edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abd-ul-Wahab, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

reason Non notable, notability not asserted

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TharsHammar (talk) 22:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Urdu Wikipedia edit

Dear friend,

You seem to be an active Wikipedian from Pakistan. We have an Urdu Wikipedia that needs all the help that it can get. Currently, we do not have many active users and we will really appreciate if you would consider becoming an active contributor. As you are already familiar with Wikipedia's style and rules, your presence would also help elevate the overall content quality.

Hope to see you soon at Urdu Wikipedia

Regards,
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.223.190.189 (talk) 22:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Az haris! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Nasir Aslam Zahid - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Irshad Hasan Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Fatima Surayya Bajia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Masuma Hasan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Ghafoor Ahmed was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! DustiSPEAK!! 23:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Urdu philosophers edit

 

Category:Urdu philosophers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Greg Bard 07:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Naseeruddin Naseer for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naseeruddin Naseer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseeruddin Naseer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rabbitfang 06:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Nomination of Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. This is also Sven Manguard 19:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghous Ali Shah Qalandar concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghous Ali Shah Qalandar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghous Ali Shah Qalandar edit

 

Hello Az haris. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ghous Ali Shah Qalandar".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ghous Ali Shah Qalandar}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

ur:صارف:کاشف عقیل

Proposed deletion of Mohsin Bhopali edit

 

The article Mohsin Bhopali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced biography article of unclear notability, tagged as unreferenced since 2011

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 09:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Owais Tohid edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Owais Tohid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 05:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hakim Nasir for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hakim Nasir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakim Nasir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 10:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Moonis Ahmar for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moonis Ahmar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonis Ahmar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 08:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Talat Wizarat for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talat Wizarat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talat Wizarat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Masuma Hasan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masuma Hasan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masuma Hasan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 09:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Moonis Ahmar for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moonis Ahmar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonis Ahmar (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor Talk 23:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Urdu scholars has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Urdu scholars has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Khalida Ghous.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Khalida Ghous.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Muhammad Azeem Barkhiya for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Azeem Barkhiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Azeem Barkhiya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Quadrimobile(T · C 21:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Urdu critics has been nominated for splitting edit

 

Category:Urdu critics has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply