Previous archives: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4

Cleanup edit

Well, thanks! Cool BlueLight my Fire! 23:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

An Automated Message from HagermanBot edit

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 23:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

My userpage edit

Thanks a lot. It really shows how active the community is. Good work. :) Cya around, Cheers. --soum (0_o) 14:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: Rubbish edit

Deleted! :) --Fang Aili talk 20:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot Whstchy 20:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Anytime. --Fang Aili talk 20:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

About my barnstar edit

I'm sorry, but my count was incorrect! I've only made 1000 edits, not 10,000! I'm sorry for any confusion. --24.136.230.38 00:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

So, I am sorry, but I cannot accept this award, for I have not made 10,000 edits *yet*. I simply mistook a userbox to say 10000 when I really have 1000 (around 2000 now). --24.136.230.38 00:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll accept this one. --24.136.230.38 20:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Maxridebook.jpg edit

Hello, Whstchy. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Maxridebook.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Whstchy/mywip. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Random header edit

Im Just Helping Mr. Pokénatzi. Anubiz 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thene make Pokénatzi stop merging pages. Anubiz 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


To show the stupiedy of what hes traying to do. Anubiz 17:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ruslan sviridov edit

I originally tagged it as a copyvio, I didn't realize that it was rewritten though when I reverted. Its still not much of a change. It seems like the rewrite just consisted of removing big chunks. He might be notable, but its a stretch. I can't find any source that he was the subject of and the page it was originally copied from is his official website it seems. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 18:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lloyd Youngblood edit

Hi - regarding Lloyd Youngblood, I don't believe it meets the criteria for speedy deletion - his notability is asserted in the article (although whether he's actually notable is arguable, the assertion is made) and it is not "blatant advertising" (CSD G11). Personally I think it's borderline at best and probably fails WP:BIO, as most of the references are to press releases and other unreliable sources. The best approach, if you think he's not notable, is to nominate the article for deletion via the full process; it doesn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion, though, at least in my opinion. MastCell Talk 21:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Annnd... it looks like all the wrestling fans have come out of the woodwork. :) Dr. Jobe is far more notable, and even he doesn't have an article. DarkAudit 02:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RFA nom edit

Definitely. Go ahead and nominate me! Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 01:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I completed the listing. Take a look. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lloyd Youngblood edit

No problem. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Paul Dobransky edit

Hello, I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on this article. Being a published author, Dobransky would seem to be notable, so if you would like to insist on his article's deletion, a better avenue would probably be AfD. Thanks. Johnleemk | Talk 08:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I certainly agree, though I doubt speedy deletion is the best way to get more information about Dobransky. ;-) Johnleemk | Talk 17:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kirkwood-Dellinger edit

I declined the speedy on this page as there appears to be a claim on notability & 1 link to external coverage. AfD may be appropriate, however. — Scientizzle 21:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Pardon Me edit

I posted this comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Youngblood, but I wanted to appologize to you for not assuming you were acting in good faith! I understand what your concern was now.

Random topic edit

Look at American films of 1930 - i will format them like this -I am doing a decade at a time -categories cannot provide details of direcotrs, actors, gentre studios and notes awards etc. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I should have added all the details first really -sorry! If you are aware of my work on wikipedia you'll know i won't create pointless articles - I intend to add tables as much info as possible -details of studios all if I can cram it all in -i intend it to be a document for each year in American film which general articles don't cover -it should have been done ages ago!!!! There are many many missing films it will begin to develop like List of Argentine films:1950s for each year!!! Thanks for seeing my aim . All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have reformatted American films of 1939 in the manner I plan - it is probably only about 10% complete! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah 30s films are great particularly the westerns - those starring John Wayne. There should be ebough films eventually to have sections A-Z under each year. All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 20:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nielsen1 edit

This may be a vanity post, but he's posted articles about other Nielsens related to this one who have more notability. But in the end, it doesn't really matter if this is an autobiography if this Nielsen is not notable in any case. --Finngall talk 22:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bunji garlin edit

Hi, I didn't create this page, but checked the references and seems to meet WP:MUSIC so stubbed and wfy'd it. You may want to consider your CSD. Raerth 02:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the page's creator is working on it, I'll dump him a welcome table. Not all read the MOS when first starting here :) Raerth 02:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar edit

Thanks for the good humor barnstar~ Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:AGF comment edit

It's fine. I just didn't want everyone jumping on the "he's campaigning against them" bandwagon and put "keep" without thinking about it. Bulldog123 15:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm NOT against there being categorizations for LGBT. I'm only against CERTAIN categorization. For example, LGBT writers and LGBT politicians totally makes sense. LGBT academics THAT write about sexuality (or something at least loosely connected to them being LGBT) is fine too. The thing is that's not what those categories were intended for. Bulldog123 15:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the VandalProof Application! edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Whstchy! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.

Kind regards,
Anthøny 19:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Brissenden edit

I removed the speedy tag and am about to substitute a prod one, which was also suggested by iridescenti. There needs to be some real documentation, & I'm going to suggest details on the article talk p. I could probably find it myself if necessary, but the sponsor/author should do the work. This is the sort of article prod was meant for. DGG 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

User talk:72.82.216.58 edit

Please try to assume good faith more often. His edits weren't deserving of a uw-vandalism3 warning but rather something like test1. Yonatan talk 22:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem, it seems he doesn't know how things work around here exactly but it seems like he didn't have bad intentions. Thanks for your help patrolling. ;) Yonatan talk 22:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Christian views of Jesus edit

Sorry about that, I was using pop-ups and must have been mid-revert when natalie reverted. My apologies. Pastordavid 16:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for understanding. Pastordavid 16:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
No need to panic at the sight of the mop and bucket -- any admin worth their salt will appreciate the hard work that you are doing reverting vandalism, and simply explain what happened. Keep it up! Pastordavid 16:18, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lennox Sisters edit

You have put a speedy deletion box at the top of this page. From the bottom of my heart, please remove this. I am trying really hard to do this for various reasons. Please remove it. I don't know how to. Alex kinloch.

Mr IP edit

Click on this mysterious link to find out who our IP friend is! Ryan Postlethwaite 16:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Eastgermanallstar edit

I know, I !voted in it already. Somebody should close it per WP:SNOW. --Guinnog 18:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof! edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Whstchy! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the moderator who approved your application, Betacommand, or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. «Snowolf How can I help?» 22:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Hey edit

Yes, I have read it. I plan to rewrite it this weekend. ffm talk 16:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I wasnt able to do it this weekend, we had a party for family, and I was travailing. ffm talk 21:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Harrah's Louisiana Downs edit

The original author apparently orphaned the article. As you can see, I expanded it greatly. I would hope this negates the ned for a speedy. Realkyhick 22:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I would've tagged it too if you hadn't beaten me to it. :-) But being a horse racing fan, I thought I would salvage an article about an obviously noteworthy track. It also prompted me to write an article about Remington Park, which I included in the article (both tracks were built by the same guy) and then saw it was redlinked. Realkyhick 22:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arenaball edit

I typically add a comment to WP:AIV when I decide not to block a user. I then add a message on the talk page of the person who reported the incident, and clear out the AIV entry. I think it is important for the person who reports an incident get notified why blocking didn't happen. For some reason, it looks like I didn't do that in this case.

I am essentially done with the matter. I know nothing about sports, so I can't comment on whether the claims on either side were true or not. What was clear to me was that it wasn't typical vandalism, and looked more like two sides of an issue calling the other side wrong. I would recommend that the two sides try to work something out, but if that doesn't happen, try arbitration. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 02:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppets edit

David,

If you "know nothing about sports"(as stated above) then why are you going around Wiki calling people names (I.E. - sockpuppet). If it was any of your business, I'm a huge fan of the old school indoor football and I have tons of info and pics/logos to HELP Wikipedia get better. But its people like you that bring Wiki down and will be banned from here. I've had extra time this week to upload dozens of logos and info to Wiki about indoor football, & since I was a former webmaster for a team, season tix holder for several teams, and current online fan club moderator for others, I think I know what I'm talking about. In other words, stay away for areas you know nothing about and stop starting trouble. arenafoot (Brian M.)

Response edit

You wrote:

How come you're using Twinkle then? </random>
My Response:
Because, I just forgot to update my userpage (thanks for the barnstar).

P.S. What do you think of my response template?
--AnonGuy 13:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fred McAfee edit

I recently made some edits to Fred McAfee (three of them in separate edits due to my overlook of the preview button), and I was wondering why you reverted them? I had links from two different sources for the statement I added and cleaned up the messy article.. did you think I was vandalizing? 72.200.27.179 23:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and sorry about the two extra edits to this comment, I thought I remembered my wikipedia user, but it didn't work. Sorry! 72.200.27.179 23:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
It's okay, I was just worried that I accidentally vandalized. G'luck, and thanks. 72.200.27.179 00:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

William D. Cohan edit

I've removed the speedy tag you placed on this article, as the article asserts notability, so the speedy process can't be used. Since the article states and provides refs to show that the subject, and his book, have been the subject of multiple non-trivial media coverage, he actually meets the notability criteria for authors. Would you please re-evaluate your AfD comments and frame them in light of meeting or not meeting guidelines? That would be most helpful. Thanks. AKRadecki 00:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

User page vandalism edit

Thanks for the RV. I was watching him, but you were even faster. Cheers, Caknuck 05:04, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Today is a good day to edit. edit

Thanks for my first barnstar. <brag warning>10,000 mainspace edits and I get this for an Afd vote?!</brag warning> Clarityfiend 06:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

After reading up on it, I don't believe that applying for adminship would be of any additional benefit to Wikipedia or me at this time. I don't need the extra powers it bestows in order to do what I do right now. I might reconsider some time in the future, but not at present. Thanks for the compliment though. Clarityfiend 06:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool Blue edit

I'm around. Cool Bluetalk to me 12:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just remembered, I have to drive in to Pittsburgh from Ohio today, so I'll be back around 6:00 EST, (5:00 CST in Wisconsin). Cool Bluetalk to me 13:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mousetrap racer edit

I'm sorry, that page was still being updated because I haven't finished building it. Please restore the page. any probs please notify me.

thxs :D -—Preceding unsigned comment added by Starwars1234567890 (talkcontribs)

ok please tell y u deleted it on my talk page


Starwars1234567890 03:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just had to stick your nose into this, didn't you? edit

Great find for Zacharie Jacob. Merci, mille fois merci. I added it to the article, though I'm not sure I handled the sourcing correctly. Clarityfiend 04:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lake Kohangapiripiri edit

You nominated this New Zealand lake for speedy deletion exactly ONE MINUTE after its initial creation while the writer was still working on it. Please give people a chance to write an article. Furthermore major geographical landmarks, such as a lake, are automatically notable on wikipedia. Did you try checking up on this lake's existence before nominating it? Did you try adding a source or extra information yourself? Such haste in nominating articles is very discouraging to people trying to add content to Wikipedia. I'm sure you're doing a good job in weeding out the rubbish, but sometimes pausing for a moment before nominating stuff for speedy deletion would save everyone else some hassle. Nick mallory 04:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jimmy Launders edit

I just added it to the Military History Project under the British military task force. Let me know if I can be of further assistance! --† Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 05:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

List AfDs edit

No problem. You caught me as I was previewing the AFD2 page. I agree, one big nomination is best. Cheers! Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

lol! I should have left you a note that I was going to nominate the others first. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
WP:ILIKEIT, that's probably how. Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:33, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I just left a response on Talk:List_of_Noble_Prize_in_Peace_winners_by_longevity about that. Yup, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS! Flyguy649talkcontribs 06:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Hey edit

I'm doing a bunch right now, and I accidently forgot to type it in one. That's the first time I've ever done that, but thanks for letting me know, so I could fix it! hmwithtalk 16:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

My RFA edit

That's all right. After about four oppose votes I knew I wasn't ready for adminship yet. Shame that AWB doesn't work on a Mac either... Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 17:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

My e-mail is wachovia underscore 138 at yahoo dot com, that's how you can get a hold of me. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cool Blue edit

I'm around. You needed to ask me something? Cool Bluetalk to me 18:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup contest: wzdftp edit

Hi,

I noticed that you marked wzdftpd article for cleanup. Being the author of the article, I disagree for reasons discussed in the Talk:Wzdftpd. -- Artagnon 19:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit

That's fine, I'm probably going to be taking a break from this anyway, but thanks. Biggspowd 19:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wazzup? edit

Clarityfiend 01:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

My email option is enabled ("E-mail this user" in the toolbox on the left). Clarityfiend 01:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Can't win 'em all. At least your stress-o-meter hasn't gotten beyond "a little tense". Clarityfiend 02:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies! edit

 

Hi, Alexandria, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies!

We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:

  • Our main aim is to help improve LGBT-related articles, so if someone asks for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able.
  • Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
  • The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, peer review and a project-wide article collaboration, all of which you are welcome to take part in. We also have a unique program to improve our lower quality articles, Jumpaclass, so please consider signing up there.
  • If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign LGBT topics.
  • If you're planning to stay, have a square in our quilt! You can put anything you want in it.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome!

-- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RFA edit

Thanks so much for supporting me in the RFA. I am grateful for your response, and it really means a lot to be appreciated. Thanks again! hmwithtalk 04:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

I wonder who this guy works for... JHMM13 15:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Critical period pronouncements edit

Do you have any ideas for a better name for the Timeline of pronouncements of a critical period for the U.S. occupation of Iraq? The list was originally at Friedman (unit) but people attacked it for being too biased/original research. Actually, maybe just getting rid of "pronouncements" is better. If we take the quotations at face value, then they identify what the critical periods of the occupation of Iraq are. One might draw the conclusion that every period of the occupation is critical, but that's for the reader to decide, I suppose. Timeline of critical periods for the occupation of Iraq? --User At Work 16:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation edit

Hey there, just wanted to thank you for participating in AFC! For a while it was looking a bit lonely there. By any chance, are you interested in taking a look at the backlog there? It is a very big one! Thanks again,--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 22:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Way to go, you rock!!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 23:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
That is typically the way that I deal with the old pages too. Hey, let me know when you are finished with that one, ok?--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 23:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Mmmm, I agree that that one is tricky. Not being able to read Norwegian, the sources are hard for me to verify. In fact, I might decline on that basis--articles on the English Wikipedia need to be able to be verified by English readers. On the other hand, there are precedents set for the inclusion of this article at [1]. What do you think?--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 00:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Keep sounds good--the non-English sources can be replaced by other editors, since opening these AFC's up for editing is one of the reasons to create them! Did you want to do the honours? (BTW, my coin came up heads!)--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 01:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

And why I wanted to know when you finished... edit

  The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For reviewing a day of the backlog at Articles for creation! --Xnuala (talk)(Review) 00:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ah, thank-you! That was my first one too! Although, now the laundry situation is in a mass backlog situation and I should really go deal with it :P--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 01:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply