Speedy deletion of Benson Adler edit

 

A tag has been placed on Benson Adler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~Matticus TC 10:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007 edit

 

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:SchuminWeb, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Oxymoron83 03:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Hunagrian Rugby League edit

 

A tag has been placed on Hunagrian Rugby League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SpigotMap 22:52, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ogis engineering edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ogis engineering, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ogis.com.au/profile.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article was deleted because it was determined to be blatant advertising.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ogis engineering edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ogis engineering, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ogis.com.au/tenders.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ogis engineering edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ogis engineering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 07:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your edits made on September 1, 2008 (UTC) to User talk:Harro5 edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Harro5, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 72.75.117.122 (talk) 08:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ogis engineering edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ogis engineering, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Ogis engineering and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 02:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Ogis engineering. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

attempted speedy deletion of Wikipedia edit

Please do not abuse the speedy deletion templates, as you did on the "Wikipedia" article. Further, you should have at least ventured a glance at Talk:Wikipedia, which contains the appropriateness of the article as a FAQ. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply