AED

Archives
Apr-Dec 2005	Jan-Nov 2006

Laser Eye Treatment

Would there be any change of a sep Laser Eye Treatment article instead of simply covering the topic in Refractive surgery? Please discuss. frummer 19:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Would like your views about an AfD

Thought you might like to add your comments about this article: List of articles related to quackery

It has been recommended for deletion. Please add your comments here:

AfD Thanks Steth 03:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Bates Method

Hi, I'm having some trouble stemming the tide of nonsense appearing on the Bates Method page. I wonndered if you could request some assistance from qualified souls on the project page? I'd appreciate it. Famousdog 14:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

You haven't edited for a while, which User SeeYou is taking as 'evidence' that I am a sockpuppet for you! I have taken SeeYou to arbitration over his/her baseless accusation of sockpuppetry against myself and you. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Bates_Method Famousdog 14:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Clarence Carter

Hi

Waaay back in June 2006 you placed an {{unsourced}} tag on Clarence Carter. I've cleaned up the page a bit and added some references, but don't know if that's enough to remove the tag. Could you take a look and let me know?

Paul Tracy_|\talk 21:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Accommodation (eye)

I would appreciate guidance from you or one of your colleagues on this article (see Talk:Accommodation (eye) and Wikipedia:Help desk#Undeleting a Deleted Article for background). The balance between the classic Helmholtz theory and the Schachar has been upset with the last edit "Ronaldaaron" edits, and one of the admins is discussing adding a COI flag. I am an IT professional not an Ophthalmologist, so I whilst I can suggest a set of edits to fix this, these would be considered major and therefore should be made or at least peer reviewed by a domain expert. TerryE 03:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Extraocular muscles

A tag has been placed on Template:Extraocular muscles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Links

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

See also WP:RS and WP:SELFPUB --Ronz (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

pinholeglasses.org, [2] --Ronz (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

request for input: eye-related article titles

There's a dispute brought on by changes in titles, already done or planned, by a user who I suspect does not have a close command of the language. Most urgently, I wonder whether you agree with the change from "Eye movement" to "Eye movement (sensory)"?

Talk:Eye_movement_(sensory)#Third_opinion TONY (talk) 02:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force

I wanted to know if you (or any friends of yours) are interested in dermatology, and would be willing to help me with the WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force? Kilbad (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance

I have nominated Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Council for Refractive Surgery Quality Assurance. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Flowanda | Talk 05:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Contact lens GAR notification

Contact lens has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Letting you know

You have been added to WP:MISS. MainPeanut (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)