Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia speedrunning (April 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Rusalkii was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Rusalkii (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 65.183.232.167! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wikipedia speedrunning edit

 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Wikipedia speedrunning, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rusalkii (talk) 01:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Barnesville, Minnesota, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply