Vandalism edit

November 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Horseshoes, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jhfireboy Talk 18:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2007 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Winfield Scott Hancock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Winfield Scott Hancock was changed by 24.120.60.99 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-05T16:53:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Howard Aiken has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

The recent edit you made to Howard Aiken constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC))Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Howard Aiken. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Howard Aiken. Alexfusco5 21:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Charles Babbage. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John von Neumann. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zenlax T C S 18:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2008 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John von Neumann, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John von Neumann was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) deleting 42251 characters on 2008-03-10T19:00:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to John von Neumann. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 19:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John von Neumann. J.delanoygabsadds 19:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Charles Babbage, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charles Babbage was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-03-24T20:10:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

The recent edit you made to Charles Babbage constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 20:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC))Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Blaise Pascal. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ffm 16:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Patrol110 (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Charles Babbage. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 21:29, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mike Wallace (journalist). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Think outside the box 15:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Defecation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Prashanthns (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to User talk:24.120.60.99.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to KKKK has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Czar Brodie (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Loyal Legion of Loggers and Lumbermen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Loyal Legion of Loggers and Lumbermen constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sterling Campbell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Kbdank71 21:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Sadie Hawkins Day constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kbdank71 21:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Loyal Legion of Loggers and Lumbermen, you will be blocked from editing. Katr67 (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

May 2010 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Nuremberg Trials worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Peanut. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 16:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert List, you may be blocked from editing. Jevansen (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Robert List has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. jeffC (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robert List, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robert List was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97428 on 2011-01-03T20:14:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Great Britain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Great Britain was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956585 on 2011-01-27T23:10:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Great Britain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. →GƒoleyFour← 23:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Great Britain. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ronk01 talk 23:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sodium hydroxide, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)hydroxideReply

September 2012 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2012 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Puerta del Sol with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vrenator talk 16:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Trader Joe's, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Trader Joe's was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938977 on 2012-10-31T15:42:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm The High Fin Sperm Whale. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Help:IPA for Burmese, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, T H F S W (T · C · E) 23:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Delphi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Delphi was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939752 on 2013-01-24T21:34:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Edwards syndrome, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 20:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 23:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to The Meadows School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Ww2censor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to President of Ireland‎ because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ww2censor (talk) 08:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 09:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Policy debate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Titanomachy, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Marcus Aurelius because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya (Hello!) 15:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Human branding has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Doberman Pinscher, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. (tJosve05a (c) 21:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doberman Pinscher. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doberman Pinscher was changed by 24.120.60.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957805 on 2014-04-08T21:53:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  gadfium 23:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm McGeddon. An edit that you recently made to NewPage seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! McGeddon (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Barq's  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MusikAnimal talk 19:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to 14 regions of Augustan Rome edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from 14 regions of Augustan Rome without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Hello71. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Meadows School— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ⁓ Hello71 17:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm H.dryad. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Meadows School has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 23:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Chiswick Chap. An edit that you recently made to Microbiology seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Factorial have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Factorial. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Meadows School, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Meadows School. Shellwood (talk) 21:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to José José— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  gadfium 02:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm OverlordQ. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Philip St. George Cooke—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Q T C 21:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tycho Brahe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply