November 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm ESkog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Calorie, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, (ESkog)(Talk) 18:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krypton with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Krypton with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mendelevium. Wikipelli Talk 19:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ernest Rutherford , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bay of Pigs Invasion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Powerade. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 17:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Call of Duty: Ghosts has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at E pluribus unum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: E pluribus unum was changed by 208.108.119.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968149 on 2014-04-03T15:56:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to E pluribus unum. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to E pluribus unum has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to E pluribus unum. — MusikAnimal talk 15:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Vsmith (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

May 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to E pluribus unum has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Willard, Ohio— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 14:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Oleaster (talk·contribs) 11:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recent edit to Xenon edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Jncraton (talk) 16:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Romanticism seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 12:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Romanticism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pearl—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pearl. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply