205.131.188.5

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -[[User:Mysekurity|Mysekurity]] ^{[[additions | e-mail]]} _{02:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)}

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Smart Fortwo. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SkerHawx 21:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the WIHT page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch | talk 11:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to WIHT, you will be blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tattoo. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  superβεεcat  17:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Regarding your edits to Roxy Reynolds:

Your recent edit to Roxy Reynolds (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to November 6 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 14:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to November 6 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Eric-Wester (talk) 14:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to 6 November. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Chronic kidney disease has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Fyyer  12:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Barack Obama "Joker" poster. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. This kind of change usually requires consensus before being made. Please discuss the changes proposed at the article's talk page. Thank you. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 19:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to WKST-FM has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Elassint (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tevin Campbell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:55, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

climate change, ARBCC, discretionary sanctions, and request for your list of RSs

FYI, all articles that cover climate change "broadly defined" are subject to discretionary sanctions pursuant to the arbitration decision at WP:ARBCC. Disruptive editing and other no-nos can subject you to sanctions including blocks and bans. At Talk:climate change you have been making plenty of POV accusations but without articulating specific article improvement suggetions based on what wikipedia defines as reliable sources. You have been asked many times to list your reliable sources but you have not done so. Repeated failing to answer simple questions like this is one form of disruptive editing, which is explicitly prohibited by the arbitration ruling I cited above.

Would you please list your proposed RSs that support your statements at Talk:climate change? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 23:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Talk:Global warming/FAQ, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

A better place is at the Talk:Global warming NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Global warming/FAQ, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have violated WP:3RR. Do not revert again without consensus. Gaba ^(talk) 00:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Gaba_p (talk · contribs) before anyone files a 3RR there needs to be at least some effort at talk page discussion. The IP really should have done that after they were reverted the first time but nonetheless I have opened the thread at Talk:Global_warming#FAQ, scientists and money. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

AN/I for multiple removal of content

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP_removing_content_with_no_consensus_nor_discussion. Thank you.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  De728631 (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Immigrant Song, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Bruce Allen (American football)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bruce Allen (American football), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ƬheStrikeΣagle 17:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Recent edit to Zoe Koplowitz

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Federal Executive Institute— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 15:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Government crowdsourcing. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:39, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---