Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Frank Zappa, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 07:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Technopat (talk) 09:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Technopat (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan King, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Worm 09:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copyright problem: Strawberry Line (Miniature Railway) edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Strawberry Line (Miniature Railway), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.strawberryminirail.co.uk/TheRailway.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Strawberry Line (Miniature Railway) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Rod talk 21:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dale Earnhardt Jr. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 20:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Catherine Tate with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nasnema  Chat  14:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

But tell me, is she, or isn't she ginger? Hence the edit. 157.203.255.1 (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Sutton Academy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Axle counter because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mdann52 (talk) 16:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blue shark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 09:20, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Igor Bišćan, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Worm, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 13:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jeff Lynne. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Zhivago (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page British Rail Class 93 has been reverted.
Your edit here to British Rail Class 93 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://nationalrailwaymuseum.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/the-locomotive-that-doesnt-exist/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2015 edit

Hi, do you have a page number for the book you referenced recently at British Rail Class 52? Cheers Robevans123 (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

recent edit on Waverley Route edit

Dear User:157.203.255.1, regarding the recent edit [1] on Waverley Route from this IP which can well be a shared address, the content is welcome, provided

  1. the text is not cut-and-paste from an existing publication
  2. proper references are given

These requirements have not been met, hence the article had to be reverted to the previous version.

If you have questions on how to contribute, please make yourself known on Talk:Waverley Route. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stoneblower— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 11:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Stawski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Flugs (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tommy Robinson (activist) ‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —72 talk 10:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Cunnington, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018 edit

  Your addition to Technology readiness level has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018 edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Watford F.C.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 13:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fabien Robert, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:56, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jason Pope. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neville Chamberlain (footballer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.