May 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to VT52 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Staffwaterboy Talk Guestbook 21:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Radiology. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Radiology was changed by 12.176.247.150 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-02T22:05:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Perfect game, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Perfect game was changed by 12.176.247.150 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-07-23T20:17:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to WarGames match, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: WarGames match was changed by 12.176.247.150 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-12-30T10:43:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Vicodin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 08:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Kevin Durant, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to P.E. de Josselin de Jong has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Susfele (talk) 03:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twenty-one (basketball). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AllPurposeGamer (talk) 18:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Intubation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Markhor with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. O.Koslowski (talk) 10:50, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm 123chess456. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Washington Redskins name controversy because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Grognard 123chess456 (talk) 03:09, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rich Eisen— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:34, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sinusitis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe talk 18:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Purdue University have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MBlaze Lightning T 18:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip M. Potempa (July 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 12.176.247.150! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Philip M. Potempa edit

  Hello, 12.176.247.150. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philip M. Potempa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Philip M. Potempa edit

 

Hello, 12.176.247.150. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip M. Potempa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply