Hello Everyone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 楊過007 (talkcontribs) 23:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creation edit

Thanks for your creation of the page,Thar Nge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thutaa (talkcontribs) 12:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, 楊過007, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Speedy deletion nomination of Park Jae-hyun (model) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Park Jae-hyun (model), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Phyo WP (message) 14:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:FB IMG 1498753346805.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FB IMG 1498753346805.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hla Swe edit

 

The article Hla Swe has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Francesca Fusco edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Francesca Fusco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wexlerdermatology.com/meet-our-experts/francesca-fusco. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Devi Thant Cin edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devi Thant Cin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/the-irrawaddy-river-is-like-a-mother.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome! edit

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 楊過007. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below:

I hope you assume good faith this time and hope not as you did in previous year. Welcome to WikiProject Myanmar (Burma) to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Phyo WP (message) 02:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Myat Yadanar Kyaw edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Myat Yadanar Kyaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NinjaStrikers «» 15:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hanna Yuri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanna Yuri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Yuri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Phyo WP (message) 15:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Inge Sargent) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Inge Sargent, 楊過007!

Wikipedia editor Bri just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this new article!

To reply, leave a comment on Bri's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bri (talk) 03:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join Women in Red edit

 
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would just like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.09% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Happening in September: Hispanic and Latina women Women in the Olympics Women from New Zealand #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 16:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aye Wutyi Thaung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Burmese
May Thet Khine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Burmese
Phoe Ta Khit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Karen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Francesca Fusco for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francesca Fusco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesca Fusco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Francesca Fusco. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello cyberpower678 Thanks you so much for your warning. so sorry for my mistake. :2 楊過007 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:09, 6 November 2017

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

楊過007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello KrakatoaKatie I sharing wifi network to another phone, My elder sister was used wikipedia with my sharing internet, it mean (1 IP with 2 account) I think i was suspended by mist­ake, please unblock my account, wikipedia is my second life, i happy to write wikipedia. I promise you ...i will follow Wikipedia's policys, i never do violate of wikipedia laws, please give me one chance, so sorry for my mistakes, please..... I will only use 1 account. So Sorry for my bad english

Decline reason:

We don't really buy into "my sister did it" excuses. It's very odd that your sister happened to show up at those articles that you had created. only (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

楊過007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I sharing wifi network to another phone, used wikipedia with my sharing internet, it mean (1 IP with 2 account) I think i was suspended by mist­ake, please unblock my account, wikipedia is my second life, i happy to write wikipedia. I promise you ...i will follow Wikipedia's policys, i never do violate of wikipedia laws, please give me one chance, so sorry for my mistakes, please..... I will only use 1 account. So Sorry for my bad english, I can't write anymore plz, i appeal to admin Thanks

Decline reason:

YOur story seems to have changed. Perhaps, as you have used multi accounts, you enjoy editing Wikipedia too much. Clearly, there is no mistake. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have restored the previously declined unblock template. Please do not remove this for the duration of your block. only (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

楊過007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit it, i use multiple account. Sorry for lie! SO sorry for do that. this is my first blocked and give chance. I never do this mistake. I really apologize for them and i really give the promise that I don't vilate the policies again, i would like to request because this account is very importat for me,please ...i will follow wikipedia rules and orders. If won't, you can take actions to me. Please forgive me generously

Decline reason:

My answer before was sub par. First, you need to list all of the sock accounts you have used, I think. Probably, the WP:standard offer applies. The gist is no edits for 6 months. Then we can reconsider. The apology is a good start, but 6 months is the earliest we can consider unblocking. That means no edits. Not even to your talk page.Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

楊過007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

wtf!!! 6months!!! OMG!! English people is so kindlessss!!! why closed 6 moths? i can't believe, so long times, i apologize to you for my mistake but you are very cruel and so kindless it ok i create new account ( create time 23 sec) why why that is not fair, why not get Chance'! next 6 months between i have husband... i can't wait. It so long time

Decline reason:

6 months is our standard offer. Seeing as below you want to "Delete your account", which is not possible. It's clear you do not wish to wait this amount of time. I'm removing talk page access at this point, as the number of appeals and comments is becoming disruptive. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additionally, as you continued to remove unblock requests after being told not to, this is another reason you have lost talk page access. Should you in the future wish to have your account unblocked, you can request this at WP:UTRS. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Because edit

you have lost the trust of the community, and the only way to begin to regain that trust is to stop. Just plain stop. Do not edit. Do not make futile appeals. Why do you need to edit so badly that you used sockpuppets? BTW, the 6 months restarts each time you edit. Oh, and in case it needs saying, no more socking. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Do not create ANY more accounts. I have blocked the one you just created for evading a block. You need to walk away for 6 months, no editing at all from any account or IP. After 6 months, THEN go to UTRS to request an unblock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nay Shwe Thway Aung for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nay Shwe Thway Aung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nay Shwe Thway Aung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TDH Skypaper (talk) 13:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply