Template:Did you know nominations/Suit & Tie

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 16:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Suit & Tie edit

Created by Status (talk), Tomica (talk). Nominated by Tomica (talk) at 16:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Article = moved to mainspace January 14; prose long enough; cites sources and appears to be fairly thorough. Hook = This is where I don't think this is ready. Hook is formatted correctly, well-cited and meets length, but it's just not "hooky" enough. It seems to me that many, if not most songs come "out of the blue", or at least that's been claimed for a fair number of other songs. I think this needs something slightly more substantive to be a good hook. Despite what my editing history may say, I don't have a bias against pop culture articles. Is there anything else you'd like to highlight? Cdtew (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Hmm... The song has been compared to many different things, so I don't think that would be a good example. Especially when it's only coming from one critic. I understand about the hook, I wasn't too sure about it either. I'll search through a few more sources and try to find something more "hooky".  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:39, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I found something that I think would be worthy of a hook. Let me put the information into the article and then write an alt in here.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Not sure how you word it, but I added new information under "background and release" about the single being promoted with the new relaunch of Myspace. Any suggestions?  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I think this is good to go for ALT 1. Struck through the original for ease of the coordinators. Cdtew (talk) 04:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)