Template:Did you know nominations/Seductive details
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Seductive details edit
- ... that seductive details may have negative effect on learning?
- Reviewed: Vincent McNamara
Improved to Good Article status by Kristabelle13 (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 22:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC).
New enough when nominated. Long enough at 9918 characters. In my opinion neutrality is acceptable, since this article passed through a GA review, and WP:CRIT states that a criticism section is sometimes appropriate. The hook is sourced to an offline source and short enough; while it may tend towards the negative, it merely presents a fact, so neutrality may be borderline acceptable; as for interestingness, I think the article title itself is interesting enough for a boring hook to suffice. QPQ done. sst✈discuss 15:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
