Template:Did you know nominations/Oakland Medical Center

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Oakland Medical Center edit

Created/expanded by Luciferwildcat (talk). Self nom at 08:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

  • ALL done.LuciferWildCat (talk) 03:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Article now has 3849 characters is referenced sufficiently but the hook isn't referenced. -- Esemono (talk) 07:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Okay, let me find it, I believe it is in one of the other Kaiser articles, should be quick.LuciferWildCat (talk) 09:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Article is long enough, right time frame and hook is now sourced. -- Esemono (talk) 03:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

  • I'm concerned that some of the phrasing used in this article may be too close to that of its sources, particularly these two. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
It's already been approved though? And I tried to paraphrase but got warned for not just quoting for every statement on the article for pink slime so don't know what to do, in any case could you specify?.LuciferWildCat (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
For example, "system problems that put patients in immediate jeopardy" in the article vs "systemic problems that put patients in immediate jeopardy" in the source - should quote or rephrase, as that wording is nearly identical. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
That should be okay, it's not more than eight words and therefore is not a copyright violation.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
But it is overly close paraphrasing. And where are you getting "eight words" from? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
That's precedent for copyrights under American law, but I will rephrase it anyways. -- (talk)
  • Needs second look. -- Esemono (talk) 01:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
  • - I would suggest adding "first modern health" to ALT1, as that would more closely match the source, but it's not so far off as to be inaccurate. Either way ALT1 is good to go. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 17:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)