Template:Did you know nominations/Lionel Conacher Award

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Lionel Conacher Award edit

Created/expanded by Resolute (talk). Self nom at 00:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Hook: Short enough, interesting enough, cited.
Article: Long enough... but not long enough. You are short 65 chars. Referencing is nice. Images are PD. Paraphrasing seems fine.
Summary: Hold for a bit. I'll probably give the article a boost myself.
  • I've given the article a 300 char boost. I would appreciate feedback from the nominator as to the worthiness of the addition before passing this. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
  • I'll reword it a little, but otherwise a good addition. I'm curious though, where did I call 65 chars short? DYKcheck indicated no issues. Thanks! Resolute 16:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
  • I can't say for sure, since DYK check showed length issues to me. You may have shortened the article doing fixes for the FLC. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Maybe. At any rate, I've reworded the passage, and even made it a tad longer. Hopefully good to go. Resolute 16:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC)