Template:Did you know nominations/Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory edit
- ... that in the Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory, an acid donates a proton and the base accepts it?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nomination
Improved to Good Article status by Skr15081997 (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 04:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC).
The article has been designated as a GA within timescale, length is fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used, the hook is cited. Shouldn't acid, proton, and base be linked? Vladimir (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)- ALT1: ... that in the Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory, an acid donates a proton and a base accepts it?
- This might be a bit more catchy:
- ALT2: ... that the Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory was an improvement over the Arrhenius theory, but still failed to explain the acidic or basic properties of oxides?
- Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 23:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- This might be a bit more catchy: