Talk:Yua Aida
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bentonia School in topic Subject lacks historical significance
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-09-11. The result of the discussion was keep; withdrawn. |
Subject lacks historical significance edit
This actress' work lacks historical significance and the page should be removed.Paradise coyote (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC).
- Okay, let's get rid of Amanda Peet's page then, too. Give me a break.--Bentonia School (talk) 05:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Image edit
Can you have that image here on Wikipedia?
Why not, I dont see anything particularly wrong with it
Biography assessment rating comment edit
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 20:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)