| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windswept Adan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Windswept Adan is currently an Albums good article nominee. Nominated by Joeyquism (talk) at 07:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: 2020 studio album by Ichiko Aoba |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- ... that the idea for Windswept Adan came to Ichiko Aoba after noticing the translucency of a sea grape?
- Reviewed:
- Comment: First nomination! The story of this album is (in my opinion) really interesting, but a lot of the sources are in Japanese and I wouldn't feel comfortable nominating a DYK with a Japanese language source for the English language Wikipedia.
Joeyquism (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC).
Expanded 5× within a 7 day span (~18000 bytes of new prose ÷ 2352 bytes of old prose = ~7.7× expansion), new enough, well-researched and neutral. No close paraphrasing that I could detect judging from the English sources; I will take it on faith that the Japanese sources were translated to English in a way that doesn't too closely paraphrase the source. Hook is interesting and has a direct citation in the article. Looks good to go. DigitalIceAge (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Windswept Adan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Joeyquism (talk · contribs) 07:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dylan620 (talk · contribs) 01:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Good article review circles/Circles#Circle #1, I will be reviewing this article. I look forward to doing so – things are already promising based on a cursory look at the prose in the lede, and I hope to have something more in-depth by the end of the day Tuesday. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 01:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds great. Thank you so much for taking this on - I look forward to your feedback! Joeyquism (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I forgot to mention: if you have any questions regarding the sources in Japanese, feel free to let me know and I will do my best to clarify. Joeyquism (talk) 01:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)