A fact from William Hiseland appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Very surprising there is no questioning the authenticity of this character's story. This article assumes it is true. A few allegedlys might be appropriate, even if at a superficial glance I can't find any sources on google that question the validity of Hiseland's age at death. Documentary evidence pre 1800 is not particularly known for its accuracy, and I'll bet anyone a groat that Hiseland's father was called William - a soldier who served at Edgehill.1812ahill (talk) 10:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above notwithstanding, if we have his DoB, and age at death, why are we unclear over his year of death? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Guinness Book of Records concedes his claimed age is based only on evidence from his tombstone. There seems to be a very long gap (almost 40 years) between the Civil War and the Williamite Campaign in Ireland in which a namesake son could have emerged from the veteran of Edgehill. I wonder if there is a William Hiseland in a published Wiltshire parish register that could fit with the claimed birthdate on the tombstone? Also the epitaph states he was 'above the Military Size' - what would that have been in his day? Given nutritional standards in his lifetime for men of his class it would have taken a tenaciously nourishing diet over such an exceptionally long life to maintain what is implied to be a tall stature in a society that had not discovered HRTs.Cloptonson (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I also question the '111 years 37 days' given in the infobox for his age - 37 days is a too small time difference between a birthdate of 6 August and ensuing death date of 7 February, which indicates 6 months.Cloptonson (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article seems to be inconstant as to whether (his claimed) age at death was 111 or 112. I think in part this is an issue connected with whether the point made at the end that ""1732" refers to what is now called 1733, as at that time the calendar year began on Lady Day, 25 March, and not on 1 January" is taken into account. Dunarc (talk) 21:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
