Talk:White Horse at Ebbsfleet

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Public opinion edit

Does anyone have any links or details as to whether the people of Kent, especially those that will suffer this lump on the landscape, were ever asked if they wanted this model of a horse? I think the article should provide some information on public opinion, thought there doesn't seem to have been any public consulatation on this project at any stage. Stephenjh (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speaking as a resident of the Gravesham district, reaction to the idea of a piece of large scale public art was mixed when it was first announced - many people were opposed to the idea but many (myself included) were positive about it too. Since the winner was announced as the White Horse the response has turn almost uniformly hostile. The feeling is that the opinions of local community were not given sufficient weight because the "voting" booth at Bluewater was not sufficiently advertised within Ebsfleet and Gravesend. The White Horse was universally the least popular proposal amongst Gravesham residents - even amongst the Pro-sculpture lobby - but seems to have recieved massive votes from non-residents who visit Bluewater from all across Kent, Essex, Sussex and Surrey. Essentially we feel that we have been lumbered with an "picturesque eyesore" by people who won't have to live with this thing dominating the view for miles around. Getztashida (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Laid Back Controversy edit

Would any other people who heard Mark Wallinger talk about the Angel of the South at a meeting in London in February, confirm that he mentioned the song White Horse by Laid Back and how that influenced him. Thanks. 80.2.15.1 15:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on White Horse at Ebbsfleet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply