Talk:What's THIS For...!
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Whats this for...!.jpg edit
Image:Whats this for...!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Chart edit
The article states that Follow the Leaders, the single from the album, did not chart. This page says that it reached number 55, and so does Wikipedia's main article on Killing Joke. Everyhit does not list the single, but that is because Everyhit only includes the top 40. Is there an authoritative source for the single's chart position? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Not only does that need work, but this entire article needs work. It is so broken up and the links on information need to be in reference form. Plus there needs to be a reception and production section. --J miester25 (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Studio Issues edit
The article reads that the studio had a deficiency in the 31-35 KHz range. This is well above human hearing - perhaps 3.1 - 3.5 KHz is what the author meant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearklaw (talk • contribs) 22:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- BAHASA INDONESIA 180.244.160.133 (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC)