This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The lack of information regarding the composition of the stone (rock type, mineralogy, etc) and discussion of possible provenance is problematic in this article. Likewise there is no mention of the geology of the Temple Mount. Could this stone have been carved in situ? Regardless of the depth of the stone it is a large "object", but maybe it was not moved at all or significantly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.202.238 (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply