Original research edit

How is this not an original interpretation of the novels? There are no sources but the novels themselves; it seems to be description of a bird, sourced to observation of a bird in flight. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 13:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The books describe how the countries in this world are located, how is that any worse a source than a book describing the layout of our own physical world? /Alkanen
The books are the subjects being described; the books and the world they describe are the same subject. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Expanded sections from their articles and redirected them edit

I have expanded four sections from their articles and redirected them as no other expansion of those articles have taken place since they were written by me over two years ago. Those sections are The Kingdom of Roldem, The Kingdom of Queg, The Free Cities of Natal, and The Keshian Confederacy. - LA @ 07:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply