Talk:Treaty Clause
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Full text edit
Did somebody miss the meaning of what "full text" means? You shouldn't truncate it with an elipsis. Seriously, who did that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.64.72.150 (talk) 01:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Explain what you are talking about before explaining other things about it!!! edit
The section titled One of three types of international accord begins as follows:
"In the United States, the term "treaty" is used in a more restricted legal sense than in international law. U.S. law distinguishes what it calls treaties from congressional-executive agreements and sole-executive agreements.[1] All three classes are considered treaties under international law; they are distinct only from the perspective of internal United States law. Distinctions among the three concern their method of ratification: by two-thirds of the Senate, by normal legislative process, or by the President alone, respectively. The Treaty Clause . . ."
Okay, you've mentioned the names three types of treaties as seen by U.S. law" treaties, congressional-executive agreements and sole-executive agreements.
Now before going on to tell us more about them, tell us what these names mean. Then readers will be able to understand what you are talking about when you expound upon them further.Daqu (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action edit
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action This directly violates this Treaty Clause.Easeltine (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC)