Talk:Toronto Clarion

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 May 2021 by reviewer The9Man (talk · contribs).

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toronto

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toronto, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Toronto on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TorontoWikipedia:WikiProject TorontoTemplate:WikiProject TorontoToronto articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feminism

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Draft talk:Toronto Clarion

Full disclosure of possible conflict of interest: I'm the person who started writing this article. I was a volunteer writer and I sold advertising for the Clarion. Nonetheless the legacy of the Clarion and its interconnectedness with all other leftist activities in Toronto during that era make the Clarion's history a notable topic and an overdue article. Anne9853 (talk) 10:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

How many names to include? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

In real life, I have been asked to include more names in the section listing writers and other contributors. The wish may be for the article to name people who were actually more central to the history of the Clarion than perhaps those listed.

Given that hundreds of people volunteered at the Clarion, and given its collectivist or cooperative nature, the wish may also be to avoid excluding people, for to elevate a few names only seems contrary to the Clarion's actual history or philosophy of inclusivity.

However, my beginner-level understanding is that Wikipedia is a dictionary, having its own manual of style, and that listing many unverifiable (i.e., not yet in a published edited book or a Wikipedia page) names would be contrary to Wikipedia's functionality and style.

A senior Wikipedia editor, reviewing the draft article, remarked approvingly that the people listed have their own Wikipedia pages, and are therefore Notable in Wikipedia terms. (This is a significant part of establishing that the Toronto Clarion article itself is notable and therefore worthy of publication.) She suggested with a :-) that if people listed did not have Wikipedia pages, I might like to write pages for them. Anne9853 (talk) 10:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

QED - Another editor removed reference links for CUP, Paul W., Ulli D., and Karolyn K. presumably because they were to external sites and not Wikipedia. That is due to the manual of style for Wikipedia. Nonetheless, I have restored Paul's; let's see what happens. If all is quiet, at some point I will restore the links for the other folks. Anne9853 (talk) 13:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic