Talk:Torn (Ednaswap song)

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2A00:23C8:538A:AF01:116C:40C7:2C1D:5C46 in topic Elisabeth Gjerluff Nielsen

Moved edit

I've moved this back to Torn (Ednaswap song). Ednaswap recorded the song first, so technically it's "their" song first and foremost. Not only do I think it would be misleading to retitle the article with the "Natalie Imbruglia" suffix, but it introduces POV issues by highlighting her version even though she wasn't the first to record it. I think disambiguating a song article according to whoever recorded it first is the best way of avoiding allegations of bias towards one or the other. See the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#Titles_for_articles_of_songs_recorded_by_more_than_one_act. Extraordinary Machine 15:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

not only that, it is _written_ by them, what else can be said, it's theirs even if they had never recorded it. --fs 05:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

And let's be honest, the imbruglia version is cheesy and vapid. It would be a shame to see a good song remembered that way (though I get that for many people it will be). --just bein honest24.22.68.127 (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Torn Imbruglia Seperate page edit

Torn - Imbruglia needs a separate page. The vast majority of people (93%+) are being directed here for the Natalie Imbruglia cover, not the Ednaswap version (or other versions). Torn Imbruglia was a global No.1 in the late 90's. In Australia, as of 2009, "Torn" is the most played song on Australian radio over the last 25 years. In the UK, on Radio 2, it has the 22nd highest accumulated playtime of any song in the last 50 years. I can't think of another song with this level of cultural impact lacking a wiki page, not a subheading on Ednaswap.

As of 2011, 'Torn' holds the record for most played song on Australian radio since 1990, played more than 300,500 times since its 1998 release, an average of 75 times a day, based on data compiled by the Australian Performing Rights Association (APRA).[1] P.S. Airwaves torn up by Imbruglia http://www.inthe00s.com/archive/70scinema/smf/1239660298.shtml

mshara1 05:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC).Reply

References

  1. ^ "Airwaves torn up by Imbruglia". The Sunday Telegraph. AU. 3 May 2009.

Norwegian edit

I'm sure I remember that this song was promoted (in the UK at least) as if Imbruglia had written it, but that it turned out to in fact have been written and first recorded by a Norwegian (?) woman. I can even recall someone (Chris Evans when he was still any good?) fading in and out between the two to emphasise how similar the orchestration was; from memory the two versions are virtually identical. I'm fairly sure that the Norwegian artist recorded version in both English and Norwegian. This business of a Los Angeles band is entirely new to me. Silverhelm 05:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

A bit of Googling suggests that I was half right. The Norwegian artist concerned is a woman named Trine Rein, who appears to have covered the Ednaswap song. Certainly her version predates Imbruglia's, though, and as mentioned above it is extraordinarily similar. So although it might be Ednaswap's song, I'd suspect their version wasn't the "inspiration" for Imbruglia. I feel there's a story to tell here, if someone is able to research this stuff properly to turn dim recollections into verifiable fact. Silverhelm 05:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC).Reply
I remember reading somewhere that Scott Cutler or Phil Thornally helped produce Imbruglia's and Rein's CDs, so I assume whichever person it was had an idea for what a "pop" version of this song should sound like. --74.34.54.216 02:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Soundtrack edit

Does anyone know if this song has been on any soundtracks? Also, I'm sure I heard the Imbruglia version without any of the vocal parts used in a commercial for a football show or some type of sports show or something a few years ago. Does anyone know about that?--74.34.70.107 04:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

David Armand edit

I think a mention of David Armand's performance of the song is worth mentioning. For many of us, that is the first time we actually listned to it.

-Robret

Diving in the Deep End? edit

Does anyone else think that the Diving in the Deep End section is unnecessary? It doesn't have much to do with the song and I just don't think it's a good idea to have so much extra information when it's not even about the original artist. I didn't remove it though because I could be completely off base. --66.158.103.242 01:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, what is that crap? Sounds pretty non-NPOV, not to mention completely useless. This article is about the song "Torn", not the b-side to Natalie Imbruglia's cover of "Torn". 69.155.81.39 (talk) 14:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good point. I think I might remove it. If anyone has any input, please explain your point of view --Infinitegames (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, good point! --Bernardo.bb (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Meaning edit

Why was the section for the meaning of the song removed? It needed some cleanup from the pointless "alternate" meanings, but it's important (or at least common) to explain what the song means. Might as well, anyway..

I figured it was about rape & her boyfriend came home too late to help her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.135.167.21 (talk) 10:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Covers edit

I removed this "It was performed by Kyla Tingley on CBC's How do you Solve a Problem like Maria?." from the Covers and Versions section since it was not properly integrated into the article. If you want to add to this section, which is already very long, make sure that it is properly integrated (this was just tacked on to the end, which is a paragraph describing LIVE VERSIONS), and also important. I've never heard of this artists, this channel or the show, so I don't think it matters and it seems more like publicity for Kyla Tingley than anything. --Infinitegames —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.68.118.67 (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Factual Content edit

Please change the following passage:

'"Torn" is a song by the band Ednaswap from their debut album Ednaswap (1995). It was their second single from that album, after "Glow". "Torn" was written by Scott Cutler, Anne Preven, Rusty Anderson and Phil Thornalley during a demo session in 1991 before Ednaswap was formed. The lyrics were written by Preven while the guitar parts were arranged by Anderson. Thornalley produced the session. In 1997, it was covered famously by Natalie Imbruglia after having been covered by Scandinavian singers Lis Sørensen in 1993, and Trine Rein in 1996.'

My issue with this is, how can Lis Sørensen cover this in 1993 when it was first released by Ednaswap in 1995? Can Lis time travel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.146.98 (talk) 09:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

My take on it is that Ednaswap wrote it and probably performed with it before they put it on a record. In the meantime, Lis Sørensen got the song translated from her label and recorded it. She was first to record, but it wasn't her song originally. This is my version of events. They may or may not fit reality. It's worth investigating further. The article certainly needs clarification in this area. -- Henriok (talk) 21:52, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Time edit

According to last fm Brændt is not 5:01 but 4:37. I do not have the original album "Under stjernerne et sted" to check this. It is also worth noting that Lis S. ´s song was a danish hit and maybe someone could name the translator. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.140.180 (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Repetition edit

The following is repeated in this article:

In 2012, Torn is declared as The No. 1 Best Pop Song by Q Magazine in their Q Special Edition 1001 Songs Ever. [3] Billboard ranked Torn as No. 26 Best Pop Song based only on Pop radio charts compiled between 1992-2012.

And later

In 2012, Torn is declared as The No. 1 Best Pop Song by Q Magazine in their Q Special Edition 1001 Songs Ever. [3] Billboard ranked Torn as No. 26 Best Pop Song based only on Pop radio charts compiled between 1992-2012.

Aisteco (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect sales performance data for Natalie Imbruglia version edit

Hi, I've spotted a couple of out of date facts/inaccuracies in the following paragraph:

The physical single of Imbruglia's version of the song has sold more than 4 million copies worldwide, including more than 1 million copies in the UK alone.[3] In the UK, it is the 85th biggest selling single of all time.[4] The track peaked at #2 for three weeks, being held off the top spot by Aqua's "Barbie Girl" and then dropped to #4. As a result, the song is the second biggest-selling single in history not to have topped the UK Singles Chart

According to Official Charts Company data, Torn is now only #90 in the list of UK bestsellers (although I appreciate a fact such as this will need to be updated regularly as things change).

There are actually seven singles that have sold more than Torn in the UK but not topped the chart. They are: Last Christmas by Wham, Moves Like Jagger by Maroon 5, Wonderwall by Oasis, Blue Monday by New Order, Stranger on the Shore by Mr Acker Bilk, Angels by Robbie Williams, and Love The Way You Lie by Eminem ft Rihanna. Of these, Last Christmas, Blue Monday and Stranger on the Shore have always been ahead of Torn, so it has never been higher than fourth in that particular list.

I hope this is helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.30.55.65 (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Torn (Ednaswap song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Written in 1991, or 1993? edit

According to a Phil Thornalley interview (http://www.songfacts.com/blog/interviews/phil_thornalley/), the song was written 6 years before Thornalley met Natalie Imbruglia, which would have put it maybe in mid-1991. However, in an Anne Cutler interview (http://www.harvardwood.org/blogpost/1130950/184575/January-2011--Anne-Preven-86), the song was written "on a trip to London right before they put the band together" - which makes sense since where the heck else would they have met Phil Thornalley? So, I dunno if this is something we'd like to sleuth out here on Wikipedia.... AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 00:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Filmed: 25 October 1997? edit

When was the music video filmed? 25 October 1997? [1][2] I added a 'when' tag [3] Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Most Played Song of the 90s" edit

You need a better source for this as the one provided does not state this. The wiki gives https://www.forbes.com/sites/markbeech/2020/04/13/pharrell-williams-happy-revealed-as-the-most-played-song-of-the-decade/#cd995af764f8

Well, that's about, as the URL suggests, about Pharrell's song in 2010s. "Torn" appears in this article exactly once - in the narrative about being in last place for the 2010s. There is no 1990s content here. Ergo I have removed the phrase "Torn is the most played song of the 1990s" - if the implication is it's still being played and therefore must be wildly successful in terms of plays - yes, I agree, but unfortunately it would necessitate original research. Please use a source that explicitly refers to the claim. --81.100.85.86 (talk) 09:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 April 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. The decision whether or not to split the page is an editorial one and therefore outside the scope of this close, so please feel free to pursue that route if necessary. Dekimasuよ! 03:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply


Torn (Ednaswap song)Brændt – I'm actually quite torn on how to handle this myself. The original, first version of this song is called "Brændt". However, one could argue that "Torn" is a different song altogether because of its English lyrics, as seen in a similar recent discussion at ¿Quién será?. Based on the way I see it, we have four options:

  • Option 1: Move to "Brændt", since this is the original composition by Lis Sørensen
  • Option 2: Split the article into "Brændt" and "Torn (Ednaswap song)", because both are entirely different songs lyrically
  • Option 3: Do nothing; "Brændt" is not a commonly recognizable name, and we should use the more well-know English title for this page
  • Option 4: Do something else; another title or proposal would work better

As I said, I am indecisive, so I'm not going to vote for an option right now. I'm curious to see what other people think about this. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 22:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: definitely DON'T move to "Brændt". There is precedence for English-language songs being based on songs from another country adapted with English lyrics: namely, "It's Now or Never", based on "'O sole mio", and "My Way", based on "Comme d'habitude". In both cases we have an article for the original song and an article for the English-language adaptation. If "Brændt" has enough sources to create a separate article of its own, I would suggest that's what we do here, which would lead to option 2... if not, then I would probably just leave the mention of it in this article, as it stands. This song was written by two Americans and an Englishman, so even if the first recorded version was a retitled version in Danish, I suspect it was originally written in English as "Torn" anyway. Richard3120 (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • If we can justify a separate page for the original version then 2, otherwise 3.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Totally agree with Ortizesp. Richard3120 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
      • @Ortizesp and Richard3120: I have encountered cases where technical cover songs have separate articles for different lyrics. One example is "Come On England", which is a reworking of "Come On Eileen"; however, another user once suggested merging the two. A more similar case to "Torn" is with "Around the World (La La La La La)", which is an almost note-for-note cover of the Russian-language song "Pesenka". I'm now leaning toward option 2 as well. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 15:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
        • I think the difference here is that this is probably not technically a cover version of a foreign-language song, like the cases mentioned above... this song was written by the members of Ednaswap so theirs is the original song, it just happens to be the case that before they recorded it, it was recorded by another artist with translated lyrics. We also have little evidence that the Danish version was ever notable anyway... the article says "it was a hit in Denmark", but old copies of Music & Media suggest that it never made the top 10 of the Hitlisten chart, so we have no idea how big a "hit" it really was. At the moment I can't see any sources to create an article for "Brændt", so I would leave this article as it is... "Torn" IS an Ednaswap song, and the Danish version can be mentioned here in passing. Richard3120 (talk) 22:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • For all this time I thought that the Natalie Imbruglia one is a song which has not had any other versions so I was expecting that to have a page all about it. Though the Natalie Imbruglia article does say the necessary details about that being a cover. I'm inclined to vote for option 2 and agree with what msharal said back in 2013 on an above section. "Brændt" is something I never heard of before myself but I agree that was the original in line with the article. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Do nothing, option 3. This seems similar to the situation with Mickey (Toni Basil song): The original song is neither notable or recognizable, so it's best to acknowledge it in the article, rather than in the title. 162 etc. (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Elisabeth Gjerluff Nielsen edit

As writer of the lyrics in Danish, should Elisabeth Gjerluff Nielsen not be listed as a songwriter in the "Brændt" infobox? 2A00:23C8:538A:AF01:116C:40C7:2C1D:5C46 (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply