Talk:Tobruk (video game)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tobruk (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 15:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Lede

• I would add 1941 before Siege of Tobruk and in Gameplay section.

• Added in lead and gameplay JAGUAR  16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Gameplay

• Mmm in reading 1st paragraph of Gameplay I feel like I'm reading the lede again, can you reword the lede or Gameplay to make it sound more different?

• I agree, I've tried to reword both slightly JAGUAR  16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Background

• "in what Cockayne admitted in a retrospective interview that "he took his eye off the ball"." -wording doesn't quite fit. Try "Following years of successful sales throughout the mid 1980s, Personal Software Services experienced financial difficulties, during a period where Cockayne later admitted that he "took his eye off the ball".

• Rephrased to this, thanks! JAGUAR  16:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good job!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! JAGUAR  16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)