Talk:Timothy F. H. Allen
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Removed most of the content edit
Removed most of the content. One section at least is a copyright violation: probably pasted from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section?content=a728443651&fulltext=743473315&lang=nl
I see no reason to believe that any significant text exists here that does not reflect the usual copy/paste modus operandi of the "creator" of the page. If any legitimate text has been removed, it can be reinserted as long as copyright violations are not reinstated in the process. Bacrito (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I restored the biography section: there is no p-problem here, because this is just the standard I have implemented in over 1000+ articles. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have no idea where you get the idea the source you mentioned relates in any to the biographical section of this article. This section is just composed from various sources, as any biography section in the aryicle I have written here on Wikipedia. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Mr Dekker, if you can forgive the sarcasm I typed in up there, I can forgive the fact that, while I've been working extremely hard to reduce the burden on you and other editors by cleaning up just a small portion of the staggering number of copy-paste violations you have committed, you have chosen to spend your time complaining about me. I stated quite plainly above:
If any legitimate text has been removed, it can be reinserted as long as copyright violations are not reinstated in the process.
If you want to quibble with everything I do, go right ahead. I don't believe, realistically, there's much hope of you undoing the numerous violations you've committed: at the very least, try not to obstruct people who are trying to mitigate the situation.Bacrito (talk) 01:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Worksection removed edit
Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, the worksection of this article is (still) removed for now. I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 10:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)