Talk:The Jimmy Timmy Power Hour
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. This needs references or it should fail its next AfD. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dates edit
I doubt the TV and DVD dates are so far appart...
Fourth Nicktoons crossover? edit
If this was the fourth crossover, what was the third crossover?
- And what were the other two? -- Rubber cat 06:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- Rugrats Go Wild! is all I can come up with. The original claim was apparently added here by User:Pikawil, who appears to be still around, but I don't care enough to bug him about it. --DocumentN (talk) 06:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- And what were the other two? -- Rubber cat 06:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Series edit
Who agrees that it should be a series
Something like that should not be on a Wikipedia talk page. And sign your posts with four tides. Internetcrazy 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Canon? edit
Is the Jimmy/Timmy trilogy canon or is it a gimmick? 68.165.173.217 22:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Suggestions for improvement edit
1) Shorten the summary section by a LOT.
2) Outright delete the Goofs and Trivia section. Lots42 20:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
afd edit
Was the result of this AfD really "keep"? It looks more like "no concensus", to me. I don't see how this is notable, and it's all original research. Why are such articles kept? -- Mikeblas (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good catch, I have fixed the template to show the true result of the AfD. 1 != 2 15:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, Brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel, brabbel. Brabbel!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.51.21 (talk) 21:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Goofs edit
The goofs as it is make little sense. At the very least, it seems the goof applies to the -second- Power Hour movie. Lots42 (talk)
Add articles for the other two edit
The articles for numbers 2 and 3 were deleted for seemingly no reason, and now redirect to the page of the first one. Please fix this and make sure it doesn't happen again.76.83.246.11 (talk) 02:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)