Talk:Taylor Steele (figure skater)

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 14 July 2014

Hatnote Taylor Steele (filmmaker) edit

Is this "filmmaker" notable enough to move the skater? In ictu oculi (talk) 22:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 July 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply



Taylor SteeleTaylor Steele (figure skater) – Currently ambiguous with filmmaker Taylor Steele. I want to create a disambiguation page. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC) – Kotija jr (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Dubious that they are equal. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • If the skater is forced off of primary topic, then these links will need to be disambiguated. Is the proposer willing to do that? This isn't really necessary as disambiguation is handled with a hatnote. I just fixed a few links to the filmmaker. Wbm1058 (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment if you're building a disambiguation page, there's also potential confusion with the surname of Shaun Taylor-Steels 's (so a see also entry) -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per WP:TWODABS. Disambiguation is only a tool to assist with navigation, but that function is already performed by the existing hatnote. bd2412 T 14:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC - Red Slash 23:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose also per WP:TWODABS. If there were more than two Taylor Steele articles on WP, then this move would make sense. However, as BD2412 points out, the hatnote is sufficient enough.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 04:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.