 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Untitled edit
So this article has not been rated yet? Well, when it is, it should say that it needs to be more neutral, and cut the company-generated blather. Earthlyreason 09:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- One of the reasons why this article still has not been rated is because the WPHK community is still trying to reach consensus as to the assessment criteria. However, I have in the mean time, added a {{advert}} tag to notify other editors. Luke! 16:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
rewriting edit
Working on the rewriting and update of information. Idunno1234 (talk) 03:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
advert tag edit
Re-added the advert tag, it seems to have disappeared somewhere since 2007. This entire article still reads like an ad/press release by TOM Group. As well the TOM-Skype fiasco is entirely missing. Perhaps it needs a db-spam? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.74.203.206 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Censoring edit
How come this article does not mention the political censoring of Skype messages in TOM-Skype performed by TOM Group? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.123.21 (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)