Talk:Suzanna Hamilton

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AntientNestor in topic New York Times movie critic

Nineteen Eighty-four Screenshot edit

I've removed the nude screenshot from the main article page and added it as a link. I don't think we should add a completely nude screenshot in the actress's main article as many people might not be expecting to see a naked woman in an encyclopaedic entry about her. Is there any official wikipedia policy about this ? sikander 09:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

One may argue that she is most famous for her nudity in that movie but I agree that it may be more like titilation on a biography. There is a promotional photo at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/fridayandsaturday_plays.shtml if someone cared to upload it. I can not since I won't "log in" to Wikipedia. 71.110.163.137 17:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

IMDB edit

At least parts of this article are identical to the imdb entry on Suzanna Hamilton http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0358180/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.254.193.193 (talk) 20:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

I noticed the same. The only remark I'd want to make is that it is hard to say which text was written first. I've never tried writing a bio on IMDb but I wouldn't be surprised if it's just as much user-written as Wikipedia. Maybe it's worth some effort to see whether this article has slowly increased in size, as most articles do, or was created from scratch in no-time, which would suggest copy-paste. Andreas Willow (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
So, all right, one of the earliest edits, 06:05, 28 January 2006 24.83.210.101, created it all in one go, from stub to, well, almost the article it is now. However, in between, there are numerous (hundreds) of edits by a Wikipedia user calling himself Jaiwills, which obviously isn't coincidentally the same as the author of the IMDb biography. Therefore, since this article basically is 2 years old, I'm inclined to believe that the Wikipedia article was copied into IMDb. There seems not to be a problem anymore. Andreas Willow (talk) 20:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Suzanna Hamilton/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

No photo. 71.110.163.137 16:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 16:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

New York Times movie critic edit

The article reports that Vincent Canby praised Hamilton's performance in 1984. The review is still online. Canby praised the movie in general terms and Hamilton got a name-check, but he didn't write anything about her acting. Deletion to follow.--AntientNestor (talk) 15:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but that is simply not correct. I ahve read the Cenby review you have kindly provided the URL for, and he says, when discussing the performances, "Mr. Burton is fine as the suave, avuncular O'Brien - his last film role - and Miss Hamilton, with her little-girl prettiness combined with a steely self-assurance, would seem to be a major find as Julia." I suggest that for a pretty much unknown actor, that does constitute praise for her acting, and the reference should not be deleted.Sbishop (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
That was quick! I've checked it again and you are right—the relevant paragraph was obscured by a pop-up ad the first time I looked. Reverting the tag, and thanks.--AntientNestor (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply