Talk:Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

About the artcle edit

The article needs to be wikified if it is not be deleted. Since the person here is a fan of Sachin Tendulkar, I should think that the article should be merged into the article on Tendulkar. If Wikipedia keeps only articles of famous persons, is it then right to keep alive an article like this? Please check this.--Soumit Banerjee (talk) 10:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The artillllk:Sodabottle|talk]]) 10:54, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion I've gone through the section WP:GNG before I wrote this but it only came to my mind reading this section WP:NTEMP. I may be wrong in understanding but please see to it.--Soumit Banerjee (talk) 11:18, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
NTEMP doesnt apply here, because the media keeps on writing articles on him. The article has been here for nearly one and half years and there has been no shortage of coverage - the pic of him and sachin holding the world cup is a current example. so as they keep writing about him, his notability as a sports fan is established.--Sodabottle (talk) 11:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Your reasons seem to be trust-worthy, so I must admit that I'm wrong. Anyway thanks for answering me. I see that my ideas are totally wrong.--Soumit Banerjee (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
No problem Soumit. Wikipedia has pages and pages of rules, some often contradictory. But there is a quicker way to learn - if you participate in AfD discussions frequently, you will soon get a sense of what is notable in wikipedia and what is not.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The article about the person is encyclopedic and some cleanup still required.Rayabhari (talk) 17:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply