Talk:Subaru Tribeca

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Japan: Cars C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:43, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Japanese cars task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

The front of this car edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

reminds me of a Chrysler while the back reminds me of a Hyundai. What's with that?! (DeathShot39 (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC))Reply

MAKE THE ARTICLE BETTER OR LEAVE IT ALONE edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

THIS ARTICLE IS A MESS AND I'M TRYING TO FIX IT. Information about this vehicle was duplicated in multiple sections, the grammar was in present tense about a past vehicle and despite the major physical changes, IFCAR insists on posting a photo that is incorrect for the 2008 version, because he likes it better, without reading the article. So FUCK THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THIS ARTICLE

This article has also been restructured for future contributions, with a lead article. Subaru will eventually change this vehicle with a new generation and I'm trying to structure the article for future contributions. (Dddike (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC))Reply

Its just had facelift, when is the next generation coming....? its better with one box, it isnt so big job to add new infobox when new generation arrives, there is certain rules to those infoboxes....when it has two boxes it looks like it already has two generations. --— Typ932^{T | C} 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

An image can't be "incorrect." There is no policy that the head image must or even should be the latest car, but quality is certainly an obvious concern. You aren't making the article better by putting a poor image at the top, so by your own advice, leave it alone. Stop reverting. IFCAR (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

You just don't get it, and I will not argue with a fool (Dddike (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC))Reply

Add topic