Talk:Speech processing
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Mr. Stradivarius on tour in topic Merge proposal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Speech processing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge proposal edit
To me, it looks like Speech signal processing and Speech processing are articles on exactly the same topic, and I think they should be merged. (However, bear in mind that I'm not an expert in this area.) Would anyone object to me performing a merge? Best — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 05:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Please do. This redundant stub has hung around too long. Dicklyon (talk) 06:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Like Mr. Stradivarius I am not particularly expert in computational linguistics or information theory, but IEEE seems to regard these as the same or closely related topics. Merge 'em, I say. Cnilep (talk) 07:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, merging is good. Since Wikipedia is about things/concepts, not words, having two articles is a form of content forkery. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 12:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I've performed the merge. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 04:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, merging is good. Since Wikipedia is about things/concepts, not words, having two articles is a form of content forkery. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 12:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)