Talk:Souliote War (1789–1793)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Djmaschek in topic B class review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Souliote War (1789–1793) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
CE edit
Tidied prose, rm a dupe wikilink, auto edded. Keith-264 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
B class review edit
When I saw the reference to Admiral Gibbs, I believed it was supposed to be Grieg. But since Grieg died in 1788, it had to be a different person. I googled "Russian Admiral Gibbs" and the only hit was a "Vice-Admiral Samuel Gibbs" in an essay titled "Prostitution of the Russian Flag: Privateers in Russian Admiralty Courts, 1787-1798" by Julia Leikin. (https://www.jstor.org/stable/26564556) So, his first name was added to the text. Djmaschek (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- B class. Good work. However, in the introduction, the last part of this sentence does not summarize what it says in the narrative (in my opinion). "The Souliotes achieved a defensive victory but failed to foment a big Christian insurrection as originally planned." It seems to me that it was the Russians who wanted an insurrection and they hoped to use the Souliotes for this purpose. I would suggest something like this: "The Souliotes achieved a defensive victory but their actions did not foment a Christian insurrection as the Russians had hoped."